Jewish World Review May 15, 2002 /4 Sivan, 5762
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | It seems at the moment that there is a surfeit of ex-presidents of the United States making spectacles of themselves. Last week, Bill Clinton let it be known he had met with NBC executives to explore the idea of having his own TV talk show. The skin crawls at the opportunities this would afford him for not only further debasing himself, but the office in which he once served, as well.
At least if Mr. Clinton ultimately secures this new platform for personal rehabilitation, the effect will probably be limited to a series of sensational statements that diminish what is left of his reputation.
Remember his discussion of his preferences in underwear on MTV?
A far more serious departure from the tradition of ex-presidents to conduct themselves in a responsible and decorous fashion is the latest international foray by Jimmy Carter. At this writing, he is adding to the list of odious tyrants to whom he has paid court by visiting Fidel Castro's Caribbean gulag. While the psychological impetus for Mr. Clinton's endeavor doubtless has much in common with his insatiable need to be back in the spotlight, Mr. Carter's free-lance diplomacy is contrary to - and calculated to subvert - U.S. policy towards the hemisphere's last bastion of communism.
While it remains to be seen how Mr. Carter will conduct himself in Cuba - will he, for example, actually denounce the lack of human rights there and demand that Mr. Castro yield to his people's desire for freedom? - his past track record of coddling dictators is not encouraging. Jay Nordlinger, managing editor of National Review, helpfully published a lengthy retrospective on that record in the magazine's Online web site on May 3. The Nordlinger essay calls to mind the subversive quality of the ex-president's conduct as a self-appointed ambassador and international busybody during the years since the American people massively repudiated his leadership in the Reagan landslide of 1980. A sampler includes the following:
Mr. Nordlinger correctly concludes that Jimmy Carter has been "a thorn in the side of presidents, acting as a kind of 'anti-president,' as Lance Morrow once put it in an essay for Time." Rarely, however, has his conduct been more brazenly incompatible with the policies of the incumbent chief executive than is his present trip to Cuba.
For example, on May 13, Mr. Carter was scheduled to visit a Cuban "biotech" operation. Mr. Castro's reason for taking him there - and, presumably, Mr. Carter's as well - is to have the ex-president personally repudiate a charge leveled just last week by a senior State Department official, Undersecretary of State John Bolton, to the effect that Cuba's highly developed biological industry has the potential to produce bioweapons. This is indisputably true; virtually any modern facility with the fermentation vats and other equipment needed for manufacturing vaccines, pharmaceutical drugs, etc. has the inherent ability to generate smallpox, anthrax and other deadly viruses for military purposes. (Mr. Bolton also raised an alarm that Cuba is proliferating such biowarfare capabilities by collaborating with Iran.)
The fact is that even skilled monitors making intrusive on-site inspections would be unable to establish whether such facilities are being used for weapons purposes prohibited under the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). That is precisely why the George W. Bush administration declined a few months ago to become party to an exceedingly expensive but inalterably futile "verification protocol" to the BWC.
It is outrageous - but hardly surprising - that Jimmy Carter would put himself into a position where he will be shamelessly used as a propaganda foil against his own government. To be sure, he has done it before. By his participation in Potemkin tours of Cuban factories and other sites at this juncture, however, he is not only lending credibility to a regime that makes no secret of its hostility to the United States. The ex-president is overtly undercutting the current president's policy of insisting on regime change in Cuba and the liberation of the long-suffering people of that island as a precondition to normalizing economic and political relations between the two countries.
There is no doubt that such regime change will occur or
that the people of Cuba will be freed. The only question is
when and under what circumstances. Unfortunately, as with
Mr. Carter's anti-presidential misconduct elsewhere, his
free-lance diplomacy with Fidel is likely to postpone, rather
than advance that date. It will also add to the anger Cubans
are entitled to feel toward those American politicians,
companies and left-wing interest groups who - by their
advocacy of ending under present circumstances U.S.
prohibitions on trade and tourism - would help provide life
support to and otherwise perpetuate Mr. Castro's
JWR contributor Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. heads the Center for Security Policy. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
05/07/02: When 'what if' is no game