Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 22, 2002 / 9 Shevat, 5762

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Who pulled the plug on the Chinese 'bugs'? -- A HIGHLY classified U.S. operation that promised to provide important -- perhaps even geopolitically explosive -- insights into Communist China's international conduct is suddenly compromised. As a result, Beijing is spared the embarrassment, or worse, that might have followed. So is a United States government anxious to improve relations with the PRC.

This could describe the sensational news that Chinese President Jiang Zemin's security services last fall discovered highly sophisticated listening devices placed aboard a modified Boeing 767 intended for his use. Interestingly, it also describes an incident that occurred in this country in 1996.

On that occasion, a "princeling" -- the term applied to family members of the PRC leadership who exploit their powerful "connections" to profit in business -- was about to be nabbed by American law enforcement authorities. He had been identified in a sting operation as the prime-mover behind an arms smuggling network that intended to put two thousand Chinese-made Chinese-made AK-47 automatic rifles into the hands of American street gangs. Worse yet, the well-connected entrepreneur expressed a willingness to provide even more formidable firepower, including anti-tank weapons, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles and armored vehicles, to the drug lords he thought were his customers.

Shortly before the princeling arrived in this country to consummate the initial deal -- at which point he was expected to face prompt arrest, interrogation and prosecution -- someone leaked the story to the American press. He never set foot on U.S. soil, escaped American justice and spared both his own government and the Clinton Administration the problem of trying to limit the damage such an affair would inevitably cause Sino-American relations.

At the time, the furious law enforcement personnel let it be known that they thought the sting had been deliberately compromised by American officials in the White House or State Department. The actual facts in this case have never come to public light. But the earlier episode inspires a question about the compromise of the "bugs" on China's "Air Force One": Might someone privy to what was, presumably, a tightly compartmented U.S. intelligence operation have deliberately tipped the Chinese off to the fact that their new presidential aircraft was wired for sound?

To be sure, the PRC -- which is said to have discovered these "state-of-the-art," "satellite-activated" listening devices within a month of the plane's delivery last September -- is putting out the word that the bugs were discovered when they began emitting static during flight trials. Alternatively, Chinese counter-intelligence may have detected their presence during a routine electronic "sweep" of the new plane.

Still, if one reflects on the kinds of things that might have been learned from monitoring President Jiang's unguarded conversations, it would appear that "Friends of China" would have even more to be concerned about in this instance than if the gun-runner with close times to the regime in Beijing had been successfully apprehended.

For example, what if Jiang were overheard confirming arrangements for further Chinese transfers of missile- and/or nuclear-related technology to clients like Pakistan, North Korea, Iran or Iraq, who may be U.S. targets before the war on terrorism is over? What if he were overheard outlining Beijing's plans for expanding its hegemonic influence in the Pacific rim, at the expense of the United States, its allies and interests?

Or perhaps we might have secured confirmation of insidious Chinese activities in our own hemisphere. He may have shed important light on the PRC's role in supporting Colombia's Marxist narco-traffickers known as the FARC, its connections to the ever-more-despotic Hugo Chavez, who has announced his desire to replicate the Maoist revolution in Venezuela, or its plans for expanding China's military and intelligence "footprint" beyond the electronic listening facility it is using to "bug" the United States from Fidel Castro's Cuba.

We might also have received evidence that previous threats made by senior military officers to use China's modernizing offensive ballistic missile force to attack Los Angeles or other American targets were not unauthorized statements by "rogue" officers, but reflect official policy for dealing with what the Communists call "the main enemy," namely the United States.

It is, of course, possible that the Chinese found the bugs all by themselves. It may even be, as some are speculating, that Jiang's plane was wired by domestic rivals jockeying to succeed him. One thing is clear, however: "Friends of China" are doubtless breathing a sigh of relief that they are not having to do what the Clinton Administration routinely did -- "spin," conceal or otherwise apologize for hard evidence that China is no friend of the United States.

A thorough investigation should be conducted to determine whether an American with such sentiments might have compromised the operation that would have collected this sort of unwanted evidence. Unfortunately, the logical place for such a review, the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), seems ineligible to conduct it since the Board is now chaired by one of China's best American friends, former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft.

Certainly it is to be hoped that, when President Bush heads to China next month, he will not express any regret to his hosts over a failed U.S. intelligence operation. The only cause for regret, as with the foiled sting aimed at the princeling gun-runner, is that the United States was denied insights it urgently needs into the PRC's true character and agenda.

JWR contributor Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. heads the Center for Security Policy. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


01/15/02: No 'need to know'
01/08/02: Sentenced to de-nuclearize?
12/18/01: Missile defense mismanagement?
12/11/01: Is the Cold War 'over'?
12/04/01: A moment for truth
11/29/01: Send in the marines -- with the planes they need
11/27/01: 'Now Hear This': Does the President Mean What He Says?
11/20/01: Mideast 'vision thing'
11/13/01: The leitmotif of the next three days
11/06/01: Bush's Reykjavik Moment
10/30/01: Say it ain't true, 'W.
10/23/01: Getting history, and the future, right
10/16/01: Farewell to arms control
10/05/01: A time to choose
09/25/01: Don't drink the 'lemonade'
09/11/01: Sudan envoy an exercise in futility?
09/05/01: Strategy of a thousand cuts
08/28/01: Rummy's back
08/21/01: Prepare for 'two wars'
08/14/01: Why does the Bush Administration make a moral equivalence between terrorist attacks and Israel's restrained defensive responses?
08/07/01: A New bipartisanship in security policy?
07/31/01: Don't go there
07/17/01: The 'end of the beginning'
07/10/01: Testing President Bush
07/03/01: Market transparency works
06/27/01: Which Bush will it be on missile defense?
06/19/01: Don't politicize military matters
06/05/01: It's called leadership
06/05/01: With friends like these ...
05/31/01: Which way on missile defense?
05/23/01: Pearl Harbor, all over again
05/15/01: A tale of two Horatios
05/08/01: The real debate about missile defense
04/24/01: Sell aegis ships to Taiwan
04/17/01: The 'hi-tech for China' bill
04/10/01: Deal on China's hostages -- then what?
04/03/01: Defense fire sale redux
03/28/01: The defense we need
03/21/01: Critical mass
03/13/01: The Bush doctrine
03/08/01: Self-Deterred from Defending America
02/27/01: Truth and consequences for Saddam
02/21/01: Defense fire sale
02/13/01: Dubya's Marshall Plan
02/05/01: Doing the right thing on an 'Arab-Arab dispute'
01/30/01: The missile defense decision
01/23/01: The Osprey as Phoenix
01/17/01: Clinton's Parting Shot at Religious Freedom
01/09/01: Wake-up call on space
01/02/01: Secretary Rumsfeld
12/27/00: Redefining our Ukraine policy
12/19/00: Deploy missile defense now
12/12/00: Sabotaging space power
12/05/00: Preempting Bush
11/28/00: What Clinton hath wrought
11/21/00: HE'S BAAAACK
11/14/00: The world won't wait

© 2001, Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.