Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 30, 2000 / 27 Sivan, 5760

Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

O.J. was 'proved innocent' too -- THE CLAIM that DNA evidence has proved hordes of prisoners "innocent" is just the latest gambit from a ferocious anti-death penalty lobby trying to bamboozle the American people into thinking the administration of capital sentences is a crapshoot.

The arguments against the death penalty, puffed up with phony statistics and false facts, have been pouring forth for decades now. Some years ago anti-death penalty advocates pushed the insanity defense: Yes, the crazed murderers on death row had committed murder, but it wasn't their fault -- they're ill. When that defense failed to capture a large constituency of Americans, the death penalty fanatics turned to the old liberal standby: racism.

They claimed blacks were more likely to receive the death penalty than whites, which worked on a few judges for a little while. But then it turned out to be false. Compared to the percentage of murders committed by blacks and whites, more white murderers than black murderers are sentenced to death. (Also, by the way, white murderers are executed with greater alacrity than black murderers.)

So the capital punishment opponents thought and thought and thought and -- eureka! -- they realized they could still claim racism by turning the racial disparity claim on its head. Since black murderers were less likely to get the death penalty than white murderers and since murderers tend to murder within their own race, this meant a capital defendant was more likely to get death if his victim was white! The argument straightfacedly reported in the willing media was that the American justice system placed a higher value on white lives since the murderers of whites (i.e., whites) were more likely to receive a capital sentence than the murderers of blacks (i.e., blacks).

If more blacks are executed than similarly situated white criminals, the system is racist, and the death penalty must be halted. If more whites are executed than similarly situated black criminals, the system is racist, and the death penalty must be halted. This makes it easy to keep up with the criminal defense lobby's new arguments since, no matter what the facts, the conclusion is always the same.

The breathless reports of prisoners being released from death row after DNA testing is just the latest salvo from a movement that wants to end the imposition of the death penalty under any circumstances, for any murderer, no matter how heinous and no matter how guilty.

It is true that DNA can be very, very reliable as to the source of blood or semen at a crime scene. Like a fingerprint, if your DNA is there it probably means you did it. But if it's not there, it doesn't mean you didn't do it. The blood or semen is only one piece of evidence. Whether it was a relevant, much less crucial, piece of evidence depends on the facts that persuaded the jury to convict.

Unless the sole piece of evidence the jury relied on was the blood or semen at the crime scene -- which later turns out not to belong to the defendant -- there is no reason to think the jury would not have convicted even had it known of the DNA mismatch. And it is highly unlikely that blood or semen would have been a crucial evidentiary linchpin for the jury. In the absence of DNA testing, all the blood or semen sample could tell the jurors is the blood type.

The DNA evidence may suggest a different theory for how the crime was committed than that postulated by the prosecution. (Criminals so rarely capture their crimes on videotape!) It may change the assumption about the number of perpetrators or the manner in which the crime occurred. And, most pertinent, it may raise doubts about whether the jury would have found the defendant guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But that doesn't mean the defendant was "proved innocent." All it means is he gets out of prison.

As the entire country ought to know after the O.J. trial, not being in prison doesn't mean you're innocent. The criminal justice system is rigged to allow the guilty to go free constantly. At each step, the legal ratchet favors the accused.

This is especially true in capital cases, which is why so few murderers are ever executed. Since the Supreme Court established new procedures for imposition of the death penalty in 1977, fewer than 1 percent of all convicted killers have been executed. More death row inmates will have their sentences reduced than will be executed. More death row prisoners will die of causes other than execution than be executed. And there is still not a single established case of an innocent person being executed in the past half-century.

JWR contributor Ann Coulter is the author of High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton. You may visit the Ann Coulter Fan Club by clicking here.


06/27/00: The last guys 'proved innocent'
06/23/00: Serious Republican candidates don't get serious press
06/19/00: They weren't overzealous this time
06/16/00: Evolution of the strumpet
06/13/00: Actual journalistic malpractice
06/09/00: I did not have sexual
relations with that ... man!
06/06/00: IRS turns Bubba's screw
05/30/00: Too corrupt to be an Arkansas lawyer
05/26/00: Choose liberalism
05/24/00: Violence against coherence
05/22/00: Developmentally disabled Republicans
05/16/00: For womb the bell tolls
05/12/00: Asylum from Georgetown
05/10/00: The truth is out there, even for the clueless
05/08/00: Barbie is a liberal Democrat
05/02/00: Moving the goalpost
04/28/00: The bastardization of justice
04/25/00: How Monica Lewinsky saved the constitution
04/24/00: It's sunny today, so we need gun control
04/19/00: No shadow of a doubt -- liberal women are worthless
04/14/00: It takes a Communist dictator to raise a child
04/11/00: The verdict is in on Hillary
04/07/00: Vast Concoctions III
04/04/00: 'Horrifying' free speech in New York
03/31/00: Campaign finance reform brings out worst in senators
03/28/00: All the news that fits -- we print!
03/24/00: Net losses all around
03/20/00: To protect, serve --- and be spat on
03/16/00: Thank Heaven for the consigliere
03/13/00: Vast concoctions II
03/09/00: The bluebloods voted against you
03/07/00: The Tower of Babble
03/03/00: Vast concoction
03/02/00: Hillary's sartorial lies
02/28/00: You have to break a few eggs to make a joke
02/22/00: I've seen enough killing to support abortion
02/18/00: A liberal lynching
02/15/00: McCain and the flag
02/11/00: The Shakedown Express
02/08/00: To mock a mockingbird
02/05/00: Summing up Campaign 2000: 'Oh, puh-leeze!'
02/01/00: A Confederacy of Dunces
01/28/00: Dollar Bill's racist smear
01/24/00: How high is your freedom quotient?
01/21/00: Numismadness
01/18/00: How dare you attack my wife!
01/14/00: The Gore Buggernaut
01/10/00: The paradox of discrimination law

© 2000, UPS