Jewish World Review July 19, 2001 / 28 Tamuz, 5761
Democrats say it is because of President Bush's "obscenely large" (actually paltry) tax cut and his commitment to a missile defense system. Republicans say it's because Democrats spend too much.
The Republicans are right about spending, but wrong in accusing the Democrats of being the only guilty party. Republicans know how to spend as well as Democrats. Their problem is hypocrisy because they are supposed to be the party of fiscal restraint and smaller government.
Examples are numerous, but perhaps the most ludicrous of all is an expenditure unearthed by the CATO Institute. The Fair Taxes for All Coalition, which has opposed the administration's tax cut, has received $618 million in taxpayer money to help with its campaign. What is more preposterous than subsidizing an advocacy group which opposes giving taxpayers their money back?
Do you like paying $150 million to a youth mentoring program tacked on to the bloated Department of Education bill? Wouldn't the money be better spent (if, indeed, money is the answer) encouraging parents to stay together and mentoring their own children, rather than having government play the role? Why is our money going for a program like this?
From the outrageous to the ridiculous: Two years ago, $14,000 of our money went to convert a charcoal grill to natural gas at the Air Force Academy. Did it not occur to anyone that a few hundreds bucks would have bought a gas grill at the local hardware store? Another $40,000 was designated to move a bathroom wall in the Commandant of Cadets residence so that an adjoining bedroom interior could be widened by one foot. The money came from an account that is supposed to support troop readiness, according to the Air Force Auditing Agency.
We're spending $150 million to relieve apple growers who reported loss of markets for their 2000 crop. Another $5 million went to the Lincoln Library in Illinois, as did $2 million for the Vulcan Monument. According to Citizens Against Government Waste, Senator John McCain, Arizona Republican, tried to kill funding for the Vulcan Monument, but got only 10 votes. Members of Congress love their pork and are equal opportunity spending pigs.
As space allows (and I'd need the entire paper for all of it), here are some more spending proposals in the 2002 budget: $5,773,000 for wood utilization research; $1 million for Satsuma orange research; $499,000 for swine waste management research; $198,000 for tropical aquaculture. The Department of Agriculture asked Congress for $2,755,000 in research grants. Congress gave the agency that and $82,409,000 more in pork add-ons.
The sugar industry gets paid $2 billion more than the sugar is worth, according to the General Accounting Office. As Mike Thomas wrote in the Orlando Sentinel, "Sugar growers grow all the sugar they can. They plow every acre possible in the Everglades and pipe the dirty water onto public land. Last year, because of the federal program, the government had to buy $430 million of sugar. Maybe the feds can sprinkle it on the cheese they give out. Until then, we pay $1.4 million a month to store it."
Stuff like this continues because lobbyists grease the palms of politicians with contributions.
Stories of lost money at the Department of Education have been widely reported. At the Labor Department, The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) had been receiving, as recently as two years ago, about $9 billion a year, more than three-fourths of total discretionary Labor Department funds. But when asked to account for the ETA grants, the agency said the information was not available in a "single volume" or "in detail." In addition, the Department said producing the date on a fiscal year basis was too time consuming, cumbersome and difficult.
Government never believes it spends too much, only that the workers are taxed too little and that taxpayers are greedy if they want some of their money back. With such irresponsible spending, taxpayers should keep more of their money and government should get