Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 9, 2004 /20 Sivan, 5764

Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Recent Iraq history | The past two weeks have brought to mind a lot of history — from the dedication of the World War II Memorial on Memorial Day weekend in Washington to the 60th anniversary of D-Day observed on the beaches at Normandy. President Bush has invoked the history and example of World War II as he wages war against terrorism, which to his mind includes establishment of a stable, elected government in Iraq.

The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Sen. John Kerry, is joined by most congressional Democrats and other party partisans in asserting that President Bush acted illegally, immorally and imprecisely in toppling Saddam Hussein from power and rescuing the Iraqi people from his reign of terror. They're glad he's gone, understand, they just would have done it differently. It apparently has not occurred to them that had they "done it differently" Saddam would probably still be in power.

Critics of the president would do well to recall an event of recent history. On Oct. 31, 1998, President Bill Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act. In a statement, Clinton said he wanted "to be clear on what the U.S. objectives are: The United States wants Iraq to rejoin the family of nations as a freedom-loving and law-abiding member. This is in our interest and that of our allies within the region."

Clinton said his administration had pursued and would continue to pursue these objectives through "active application of all relevant U.N. Security Council resolutions. The evidence is overwhelming that such changes will not happen under the current Iraq leadership" (emphasis mine). Clinton also referred to "Iraq's weapons and missile programs," which he said he wanted to eliminate.

The language of the resolution is even tougher and more detailed than Clinton's statement. It lays out, like a criminal indictment, a number of "findings" about Iraq's behavior since 1980 when it invaded Iran and used chemical weapons in an eight-year war that killed hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions.

Donate to JWR

In Section 3 of the act are these words: "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." President Bush turned those words into action. A number of Democrats who voted for the Iraq Liberation Act, including Kerry, are now critical of President Bush for doing precisely what they said at the time they wished the Clinton administration would do.

President Bush received a major boost from Iraq's new prime minister, Ayad Alawi, who on June 5 formally requested American and British forces stay on in Iraq after the official transfer of "sovereignty" on July 1. Alawi warned that, should they leave, a "major disaster" might ensue.

The president has been right to warn of stepped-up violence before, during and after the transition. Terrorists are not about to surrender their future in Iraq or anywhere else. They must be defeated and their host countries and financial backers convinced that if they continue to harbor such people, they will suffer the same fate as Saddam Hussein.

The president should continue reminding the public that victory will not be easy, just as success in World War II was not easy. That victory six decades ago destroyed the twin evils that had gripped Germany and Japan. But one evil is always replaced by another. We are being tested at least as much as we were in World War II. Then, Hitler thought America was weak and bet his Third Reich on it. He lost.

Now it's Osama bin Laden's turn to test a new generation of Americans to see if it has the will and the strength to vanquish him and his "evildoers," as the president likes to call them.

Supporters of Iraq's liberation the way the president accomplished it might wish to make copies of the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act and give it wide distribution. It would remind people what even many Democrats, including Kerry, favored in the recent past.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Cal Thomas is the author of, among others, The Wit and Wisdom of Cal Thomas Comment by clicking here.

Cal Thomas Archives


© 2002, TMS