Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Feb. 24, 2005 / 15 Adar I 5765

Amity Shlaes

Amity Shlaes
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Flying in the face of good ideas


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | President Bush is in Europe today trying to craft a trans-Atlantic relationship of legacy quality. Still, his domestic legacy also needs attention. Indeed, if Bush doesn't act fast, he will be too late to stop damage to the single most important element of that legacy: a relatively competitive U.S. economy.

A single phrase—"good ideas"— created the problem. The president is leading the charge to reform and privatize Social Security. Like the tax cuts that came earlier, these are both measures that would strengthen his economic legacy. After all, with a solvent pension system and dropping tax rates, the U.S. would be better positioned than most developed nations to handle growing challenges from developing ones (read, China). Things were looking especially good last week, when Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve Board chairman, blessed the main components of the Bush plan. Looking good, that is, until Bush allowed that he might consider raising payroll taxes on higher earners to fund his changes, among other "good ideas."

Currently, each worker pays 6.2 percent of wages in Social Security taxes; his employer pays another 6.2 percent. But that total 12.4 percent tax applies to only the first $90,000 of income. Bush suggested to the New Haven Register that he would be open to removing that $90,000 cap so that all the income of higher earners would be subject to this payroll tax.

He may have elaborated on his thoughts the next day, but no one heard him. The roars of rage from the Republican base drowned out all conversation.

Bush's concession is being played as a political story and it certainly is one. His friends say he moved for tactical reasons, merely to woo Democrats—whose support is necessary— to the table. Every Republican Party official recalls the moment when George H.W. Bush, the president's father, first hinted that he would betray repeated pledges not to increase taxes. In a similar moment of fiscal tension— the 1990 budget negotiations— Bush senior let drop the thought that he might allow "tax revenue increases" to narrow a deficit.

He went on to tarnish not only his legacy but Ronald Reagan's as well by raising rates and undoing the historic tax reform of 1986. The salient feature of the Bush change was an increase in the progressiveness of the rate structure. Bush senior and his advisers wagered that by taking this action in 1990 they might be able to recover by 1992. But not even the gulf war victory of 1991 or German reunification could save him.

The most avid student of that bitter experience was the current president, who went on to campaign as a tax cutter. Now he is also debating an increase in progressiveness.

The Republican blogosphere is already trying out the narrative. If Bush repeats his father's error, the pair will go down in history as the bookends to an era of Republican fiscal hypocrisy. The symmetry is so neat as to terrify. Screen rights, anyone?

But the political drama obscures something more important— the economic consequences of cap lifting. It is possible, as even Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the Republican chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is saying that lifting the cap makes sense. After all, the federal budget is in trouble, with alarming numbers, just as in 1990. In a static and nominal sense, capturing more of the revenue from higher earners would do something for balance sheets.

Still, such calculations omit what the payroll tax increase would mean to the culture of entrepreneurship. Fewer than one in 10 workers earns enough to be affected by a lifting of the cap. But many of those earners are job creators— lawyers, doctors and, most important, small businesses. The potential tax increase for these productive earners is enormous.

Donate to JWR


Last year, a couple earning $90,000 faced a marginal income tax rate of 25 percent. If all of their wages (including the employer side) beyond the $90,000 mark were also subject to the payroll tax of 12.4 percent, that would represent a significant increase in the household marginal tax rate. Since income tax rates are higher for higher earners, some households could see a tax rate approaching the 50 percent line.

But of course they will not go quite that far, comes the standard rebuttal. The cap will not be lifted, it will merely be adjusted upward to cover, say, the first $200,000 in income. Or it will only be lifted on one marriage partner. And so on.

These arguments, however, miss a crucial point. National economies are just like markets: Change matters on the margin, and one change begets similar changes. To lift the cap once is probably to lift it again. And to give in on this one tax is to open the door to raising other taxes— that, at least, was what happened to Bush senior.

What is more, increasing such an important tax on labor signals that the U.S. is open to heading in the European direction. This at a time when the only chance of sustaining U.S. growth rates is for the country to become more like Asia.

Bush should cough twice, clarify and apologize. Apologies hurt, but even a thousand are worth it when it comes to preserving such a strong legacy as this one.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Financial Times . Her latest book is The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It. Send your comments by clicking here.

Up

02/16/05: Why we are hostage to granny and her purse
02/02/05: Moral action should be its own reward
01/27/05: It's OK to declare that women are from Venus
01/25/05: Soros should revive the old liberalism
01/11/05: Fannie Mae's story is not one of corporate greed, or executive compensation, or the challenges of accounting regulation standards. It's a story of moral hazard
12/22/04: Focus on growth, not backbiting
12/09/04: Tide of democracy sweeps the globe: Prospects for free elections becoming a trend
11/30/04: Change the tax regime to help America save
11/11/04: Ignore the scaremongers — Social Security `crisis' fixable
11/01/04: U.S. election about class, not politics
10/20/04: ‘Reckless and extreme’
10/06/04: Under construction: Threat of nuclear proliferation
09/19/04: A no-confidence vote in consumers
09/08/04: Caught in a triangulation traps
09/01/04: Competitive endgame
06/22/04: Oil as a curse
06/16/04: What de Gaulle can teach us about Iraq
05/18/04: Why trade matters in a time of war: Promising steps by U.S. and EU against protectionism
05/12/04: Let's face it, planning your life to reduce your tax bill is a time-honored and legal tradition
04/29/04: Being caught between 2 complicated syndromes: The high cost of living in big cities and the progressive structure of the U.S. tax code
04/20/04: Kerry's ‘Misery Index’ is just sad
04/15/04: John Kerry's ‘tax the rich’ mantra won't get the jobs done
04/02/04: Faithful following at the White House
02/25/04: It's back to the Dark Ages on trade
02/20/04: Trust the U.S. or trust Al Qaeda
02/12/04: A Political Year of Yalies: Boola Boola for Meritocracy
02/04/04: Here's what America doesn't need: Another New Deal
01/15/04: Forget Mars, U.S. economy looking like the final frontier
12/30/03: Bob Bartley put morality's place in the market economy
12/18/03: Mission accomplished: 1991's, that is
12/11/03: Shrugging off outdated data: Inside America's economic machine
11/13/03: Leaving a little something for the kids? Good luck
11/05/03: Never, Never will we Desist
09/30/03: Tax, lies and a few supply-side parables 10/09/03: Free markets are the key to rebuilding Iraq

09/25/03: Don't be sentimental, Mr. Bush
08/12/02: Howard Dean, Robin Hood
05/29/02: Berlin Diarist: To believe that by self-improvement and restraint, we can end tyranny
03/27/02: The curse of oil
11/12/02: Political Correctness at the Fed (No joke!)
10/31/02: Local enforcer who has changed national laws
10/12/02: No Mirror for Europe; US is a picture of unity
08/14/02: Keeping your financial eggs at home
07/24/02: New Democrats' unaffordable luxury
06/26/02: The evolution of eminent domain is the story of the lasting power of Supreme Court decisions to alter the American cultural fabric
06/20/02: The distinction between known risk and uncertainty: What was lost in the Martha Stewart flap
06/11/02: Europe, long waiting for a chance to assert itself as independent from the US on the world stage, is clueless to terror's threat
06/04/02: A Cold Warrior's lessons for the Middle East
05/21/02: Geography does matter when it comes to development, but aid must nonetheless be linked to good governance
05/14/02: The increasing number of new claims is hurting innocent companies and making a mockery of the Common Law system
05/09/02: Aid, development and guilt in our times of terror
04/30/02: Wine lovers may at last be able to stray across state borders. The Internet is coming to the aide of free trade
04/23/02: Taxation by way of Madison Avenue
04/17/02: Special relationships and free trade do not mix
04/08/02: Is terror the flip side of globalization?
03/20/02 Bush gives aid but seeks results
03/13/02 The Danger in policy by numbers
02/26/02: States' smokescreen for tax hypocrisy
02/20/02: Echoes of leadership against a global threat
02/13/02: Jackson Vanik May be a Useful Analogy When Thinking About the Middle East
02/07/02: Budgeting for victory: Requiem for a peace dividend
02/05/02: The detectives of 1930s pulp fiction had a nose for clients bearing gifts. Sadly, those consulted by Enron did not
01/22/02: Allow all American children a decent chance
01/15/02: Do not disturb the profit-sharing revolution
01/09/02: It is dangerous to elevate a currency as a political emblem if the need for other economic reforms is obscured
01/03/02: There is only one way for a free thinker to bring up children
12/20/01: Why America's economy always bounces back
12/18/01: When it comes to taxes, Washington lawmakers can learn a thing or two from The Honeymooners
12/13/01: Bush opens a new era
12/12/01: A flamboyant reversal for the Democratic party
12/06/01: Threat of an oil embargo on the U.S. is a bluff
11/29/01: Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity?
11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds
10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur
09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes
08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book
08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress
07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?
07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts
07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse
06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee
06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth 06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland
06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade
06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq
06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?
06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful
06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill
05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction
05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence
05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers
05/14/01: Adam Smith in love
05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists
05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone
05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly
05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again.
04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs
04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top
04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers
04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door
03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver
03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar
03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy
03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession
03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America
03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence
03/05/01: Fighting the good fight
03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up
02/27/01: IT's important
02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires
02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'
02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan
02/05/01: Crack and Compassion
01/31/01: Debt is good
01/29/01: Clueless
01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking
01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind
01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait
01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator
01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience'
01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes
12/11/00: So smart they're dumb
12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush
12/04/00: The Boies factor
11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"
11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game
11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election
11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model
11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election
11/09/00: Those powerful expats
11/07/00: What's right for America versus what works
11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot
10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility
10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness
10/24/00: The most accurate poll
10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right
10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich
10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks
10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism
09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy
09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?
09/18/00: First steps to success
09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant
09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost
09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending
08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people
08/28/00: A reali$tic poll
08/21/00: "I Goofed"
08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets
08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia
07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To
07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world
07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead
07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths
07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders
07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry
07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts
06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head
06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality
06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes

© 2005, Financial Times