Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 29, 2001 / 14 Kislev, 5762

Amity Shlaes

Amity Shlaes
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Which is more important--the war or diplomatic comity? -- THE mood toward the U.S. among its allies has shifted. Where before Europe was ready to supply unstinting support--"We are all Americans now"--today there is hesitation and, behind closed doors, even some scolding.

When it needed the allies, the U.S. called on continental Europe and the United Kingdom to join it in its new war. But now America is accused of behaving like a cowboy--reverting to "the old Bush `up yours' unilateralism," as The Guardian put it. America is not doing its part to support great multilateral causes ranging from biological weapons diplomacy to international justice for terrorists.

But the trouble with multilateralism is that it has become a game--a game for its own sake. Multilateral institutions are, after all, only as good as the real-time goal they serve. And at this crucial moment, that goal is ending the global threat that gave us Sept. 11.

Seen in this context, U.S. departures from various multilateral agendas cease to look like cowboy antics. Rather they represent leadership that can make the world safer, including for the nations doing the scolding.

Take a security issue at the top of the mind of many citizens of Western nations: germ warfare. This month, at a conference of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention in Geneva, the U.S. renewed its objections to a new draft for the treaty. John Bolton, the State Department's undersecretary for arms control and international security, pointed out that the treaty had not prevented signatory nations from developing biological weapons. Instead, the treaty had afforded a cover to nations that continued to mill anthrax.

So, Bolton said, will the new protocol. That is because it does not contain any effective means for verifying whether signatory nations are keeping their word. The plan requires advance notice, allowing laboratories there to conceal their work.

Additionally, the U.S. said that Iraq, a 1972 signatory, "developed, produced and stockpiled biological warfare agents and weapons and continued this activity even after ratifying the [biological weapons convention] in 1991." It took advantage of the absence of United Nations inspectors since 1998 to continue such work. Iraq denied it, a statement carried all over the world.

The U.S. also pointed a finger at North Korea's Kim Jong Il and was backed by South Korea's defense minister, who has announced that Pyongyang now controls about 5,000 tons of biological and chemical weapons. Tehran and Libya, the U.S. said, are also developing biological weapons. Syria "may be capable of producing small quantities of an agent" and there is disturbing evidence about Sudan.

To deter scientists and their masters from developing such weapons in the future, the U.S. wants the treaty to require signatories to prosecute those in their countries who work in germ-warfare laboratories. It has also called for a new international code of conduct for all scientists and monitoring of individual scientists.

By ostentatiously listing signatory offenders, America has cast doubt on whether reliance on the treaty alone can prevent rogue nations from fortifying their germ arsenals. One might think that European governments would side vociferously with the U.S. on this issue. After all, last week brought news of another case of inhalation anthrax involving a woman in Connecticut.

A reminder of the futility of the biological weapons convention also came with news of the death of Vladimir Pasechnik, a former official in the Soviet Union's germ- warfare program. After his defection to the West, Pasechnik said he never knew his research violated the Soviet Union's legal commitment not to engage in such work.

Yet when the Iraqi regime objected to the U.S. claim, European governments kept silent, or isolated the U.S. by accusing it behind closed doors of being "counterproductive."

The same habit--favoring multilateralism per se over the recognition of bitter realities--is showing up in other arenas. A Spanish judge announced that Spain would not hand over suspected terrorists to the U.S. for trial unless it promised not to try them under military tribunals, or to subject them to the death penalty. If the U.S. did not agree, the implication was, it was not measuring up to the new global standard on human rights, as embodied in such multilateral documents as the European convention on human rights. The truth is that this would slow down the U.S. in what everyone says is crucial work: bringing terrorists to justice.

Cowboy has become code for "dumb Republican;" implicit in the scolding of the U.S. cowboy is the argument that the Clinton administration played the multilateral game better. This is true, insofar as that administration took greater pains not to upset others. It did not name names (aside from Iraq) at weapons convention meetings. But this focus on finesse failed to prevent rogue states from building up their stockpiles.

It may well be that there are motives for the new scolding. The U.S. is weighing seriously toppling Saddam Hussein, germ-war factories and all, and Britain may not want to go along. The Spanish government may value its opposition to the death penalty more highly than pursuing terrorists. But neither of these goals has much to do with multilateralism.

For its part, the U.S. does not have the luxury of fussing about diplomacy; it must proceed as best it can, for it was Osama bin Laden's initial target. When Europe hurts the U.S. it also hurts itself, because it makes its own citizens more vulnerable to future terror attacks. When we support multilateralism for its own sake, we all lose.

JWR contributor Amity Shlaes is a columnist for Financial Times . Her latest book is The Greedy Hand: How Taxes Drive Americans Crazy and What to Do About It. Send your comments by clicking here.


11/20/01: Unbalanced by a wealth of oil and diamonds
10/17/01: Afghanistan Needs a General MacArthur
09/27/01: The US has gained an understanding of the costs of war for which its European allies have hitherto wished in vain
09/13/01: War against terrorism will rise from the ashes
08/15/01: Geography is no excuse for the state's economic stagnation. Its policymakers should take a leaf from Ireland's book
08/07/01: Teamsters may pay a heavy price for winning its batle in Congress
07/25/01: Towards a patent-free nirvana?
07/17/01: History proves the lasting value of tax cuts
07/10/01: Stem cell research has awakened a bitter debate in Washington but voters care more about other electoral issues
07/03/01: America foots the bill for Europe's largesse
06/26/01: America the litigious, land of the lawyer's fee
06/20/01: Five reasons for gloom about global growth 06/18/01: Show pity for Alice in Tax Wonderland
06/13/01: America must take a French lesson in trade
06/11/01: Time to dream the impossible dream for Iraq
06/07/01: Whatever happened to simple?
06/04/01: When the relationship between companies becomes as close as a marriage, the eventual break-up is often very painful
06/01/01: Loving and hating the Bush tax bill
05/30/01: Will Grisham soon be unemployed? In America's courts these days, there's no room left over for legal fiction
05/22/01: Republicans sample the rhetoric of confidence
05/16/01: Boeing has been promised $60m to site its headquarters in Illinois. The deal looks a poor one for taxpayers
05/14/01: Adam Smith in love
05/09/01: Those rotten Russian capitalists
05/07/01: Why tax havens provide shelter for everyone
05/04/01: Middle classes pay for get-the-rich folly
05/01/01: Money can't buy happiness? Think again.
04/26/01: Calling America's rogues and entrepreneurs
04/19/01: High earners right to feel lonely at the top
04/11/01: The right must learn the comfort of strangers
04/04/01: When domestic law arrives by the back door
03/30/01: A Lexus tax cut suits the jalopy driver
03/27/01: The unchallenged dominance of King Dollar
03/20/01: Natural selection of an intellectual aristocracy
03/16/01: The hidden danger of a regulatory recession
03/14/01: Is the American condition that boring? Why so many Oscar nominated movies aren't set in America
03/07/01: Trampling on the theory of path dependence
03/05/01: Fighting the good fight
03/01/01: It is time for Fannie and Freddie to grow up
02/27/01: IT's important
02/22/01: The guilty conscience of America's millionaires
02/14/01: The benefits of helping the 'rich'
02/09/01: The Danger and Promise of the Bush Schools Plan
02/05/01: Crack and Compassion
01/31/01: Debt is good
01/29/01: Clueless
01/24/01: A gloomy end for a half-hearted undertaking
01/17/01: The challenge of an ally with its own mind
01/15/01: An unexpected American family portrait
01/10/01: A fitting legacy for America's beloved dictator
01/08/01: The trick of tax 'convenience'
01/03/01: Time to stop blaming Greenspan over taxes
12/11/00: So smart they're dumb
12/06/00: How economic bad news came good for Bush
12/04/00: The Boies factor
11/30/00: "The inevitable demands for recounts erupted like acne…"
11/28/00: Fair play and the rules of the electoral game
11/23/00: The shining prospect beyond a cloudy election
11/21/00: Try the Cleveland model
11/16/00: A surprising winner emerges in the US election
11/09/00: Those powerful expats
11/07/00: What's right for America versus what works
11/02/00: Time to turn off big government's autopilot
10/30/00: Canada beating America in financial sensibility
10/26/00: When progressiveness leads to backwardness
10/24/00: The most accurate poll
10/19/00: The Middle East tells us the hawks were right
10/17/00: The split personalities of America's super rich
10/10/00: 'Equity Rights' or Wake up and Smell the Starbucks
10/04/00: Trapped in the basement of global capitalism
09/21/00: The final act of a grand presidential tragedy
09/21/00: Europeans strike back at the fuel tax monster. Should Americans follow?
09/18/00: First steps to success
09/13/00: America rejects the human rights transplant
09/07/00: Minimum wage, maximum cost
09/05/00: Prudent Al Gore plans some serious spending
08/31/00: A revolution fails to bring power to the people
08/28/00: A reali$tic poll
08/21/00: "I Goofed"
08/16/00: Part of the union, but not part of the party
08/09/00: Silicon Alley Secrets
08/02/00: Radical Republicans warm up for Philadelphia
07/31/00: I'll Cry if I Want To
07/27/00: Cold warrior of the new world
07/25/00: The Estate Tax will drop dead
07/18/00: Shooting down the anti-missile defence myths
07/14/00: A convenient punchbag for America's leaders
07/07/00: How to destroy the pharmaceutical industry
07/05/00: Patriots and bleeding hearts
06/30/00: Candidates beware: New Washington consensus on robust growth stands the old wisdom on its head
06/28/00: White America's flight to educational quality
06/26/00: How Hillary inspired the feminist infobabes

© 2001, Financial Times