Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 1, 2003 / 1 Tamuz, 5763

Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

It's time to take back the Constitution | You know that all hell has broken loose at the Supreme Court when the New York Times lead editorial summed up the recent blockbuster decisions this way -- "A Moderate Term on the Court."

Moderate, my asterisk.

In the Michigan affirmative action case and the Texas sodomy case, the Court has unambiguously established itself as governmental branch of choice for America's university, metropolitan, and entertainment elites.

The diversity mavens at our elite campuses inundated the Court with amicus briefs in support of Michigan's use of race as a factor in admissions, and swing vote (who is now the left-wing vote) Sandra Day O'Connor bought their bogus argument (even while rejecting the more "rigid point system" used in undergrad admissions) and authored the majority opinion for the Court. So much for the goal of a colorblind society. Then with reasoning eclipsing O'Connor's in its sheer convolution, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Court in Lawrence v. Texas, found that the Constitution protected homosexual sodomy as a "liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions." The left was glowing in the aftermath-they know full well that if states cannot ban gay sodomy under our Constitution, then it's only a matter of time before bans on gay marriage are struck down.

Conclusion: neither the will of a democratic majority, nor the Constitution, nor even recent precedent will stop this Court from social engineering from the bench.

How could this have happened? Seven out of the nine justices currently sitting were appointed by Republican presidents!

John Paul Stevens was nominated by Gerald Ford yet has been a stalwart liberal vote for decades. David Souter glided onto the Court after being highly touted by Bush (I) White House adviser John Sununu and then New Hampshire Senator Warren Rudman--conservatives coast to coast still haven't forgiven either of them. Ronald Reagan nominated Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy to the Court with high hopes, but both have turned out to be major disappointments on key cases. From the Casey decision in 1992, where Kennedy earned his nickname "Flipper" for switching his vote at the last minute to favor abortion rights, to this year's affirmative action decision where O'Connor gave a thumbs up to reverse discrimination for diversity's sake, the majority of Republican appointees on the Court have become captives of the same elites who invite them to spend their summer recess as "visiting scholars" at universities at home and abroad or as speakers at high-minded retreats.

Donate to JWR

What can be done about this? If Republicans don't learn the lesson now, conservatives will feel less and less compelled to send money or devote time to helping the GOP keep winning elections. If these are the sorts of rulings we get with Republican judicial appointees, what's the point?

President Bush must take the same tough-minded, unyielding, approach to choosing his Supreme Court nominees as he did with the war in Iraq and the war on terror. To heck with the critics--they'll oppose anyone you put up short of someone who is adamantly pro-abortion. Indeed the Democrats are so cocky about their successful filibusters of Courts of Appeals nominees, they're now demanding to be consulted before the President nominates someone for the Court. Hillary Clinton warned the White House to work "collaboratively" with the Senate, and to "pick someone who isn't a poke in the eye, who isn't an extremist."

If it weren't so outrageous, it would be amusing. The best approach is for President Bush to nominate an unquestionably solid judicial conservative. No one who waffles at the though of a negative mention in the Washington Post. No one who believes the constitution must "evolve with the times."

Nominating someone for purely political reasons-such as Alberto Gonzales, White House Counsel, and prominent Latino-would be a mistake of Souterian proportions. He was responsible for the Administration's softened position on the affirmative action case, and no reliable conservative court watchers believe him to be a stalwart like William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, or Clarence Thomas.

The President has already learned from his father's presidential mistakes--leaving Saddam in office, and raising taxes---but this lesson is, I dare say, more important.

But the burden to corral the judicial activists isn't just on President Bush. It's on the politicians we sent to Washington to represent our interests. On Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist supported a constitutional amendment to the Constitution banning gay marriage. Anticipating the Court extending gay sodomy rights to marriage rights, Frist said: "I very much feel that marriage is a sacrament, and that sacrament should extend and can extend to that legal entity of a union between -- what is traditionally in our Western values has been defined -- as between a man and a woman. So I would support the amendment."

The Senate push for such an amendment should happen now, before the courts start striking down the Defense of Marriage Acts that are already law in states across the country. It is not enough for Senator Frist to state his support for such an amendment, he needs to lead to make this amendment a reality.

Let the Democrats align themselves with gay marriage (along with tax increases, and the UN). That will only redound to the Republicans great benefit and perhaps help people realize just how important these judicial appointments are. (We wouldn't need to go through all this nonsense of amending the Constitution if the Court actually stuck to interpreting the Constitution instead of legislating from the bench.)

For almost 30 years, Republican leaders have been telling conservatives to turn out to vote for the GOP because if they don't, we'll have more Roe v. Wade-like decisions handed down by Democrat-appointed liberal justices. Well, here we are, almost four Republican presidential terms later, and yet more Roe-like decisions is exactly what we've gotten.

Mr. President, Senator Frist: Do the right thing.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Laura Ingraham is the host of a radio show syndicated nationally by Westwood One Radio Network and the author of "The Hillary Trap: Looking for Power in All the Wrong Places". Comment by clicking here.

04/01/03: Peter Arnett's MOAB
03/25/03: The Dems' Michael Moore Problem
03/18/03: Dixie Chicken out
03/11/03: The real predator drones
03/04/03: The French PR machine crashes
02/25/03: Keep us safe --- let's be more like Europe!
02/11/03: Hollywood loves dictators
02/05/03: First Amendment frauds in Cincinnati
01/28/03: The elites versus the voters
01/22/03: Playing (and losing) Homeland Security politics
01/14/03: What have you done for the free world lately?
12/17/02: Who is the better leader: Gore or Lott?
12/10/02: Who, more than anyone else, is actively advancing the cause of civil liberties around the world?
12/04/02: 'Tis the season to hope for the worst
11/27/02: The Federal P.C. Police Versus Small Business Owners (Cont'd)
11/19/02: Bipartisan moves to reward illegals
11/13/02: Eminem, a rebel? You gotta be kidding!
11/05/02: In defense of low turnout
10/30/02: Hell, no they won't go!
10/22/02: Where are the moderate Muslims?
10/15/02: California dreaming, cont'd
10/08/02: Slick Willie's running
10/01/02: Euro-worries about wall flower status
09/26/02: How lucky we are that the Straight Talk Express drove off the cliff!
09/18/02: What Jackson and Sharpton know about conservatives
09/12/02: The Today Show v. guns
08/27/02: Bush not attending the UN-sponsored "bash Amerika" conference!?
08/20/02: The NEA: Let the anti-American indoctrination begin!
08/13/02: Bubba's revenge
08/07/02: Bilingual bust continues its drag on our schools
07/30/02: Dems love for big lawyers=big opportunity
07/23/02: No time for vacation
07/16/02: Is Homeland Security all wet?
06/25/02: The firing season has arrived
06/18/02: Picking the next chief
06/11/02: Intelligence coup, with much more to do
06/07/02: The Bush administration's foul ball
05/30/02: Post-feminism in the aftermath of 9-11
05/23/02: The press gunning for Ashcroft
05/19/02: El Jefe basks in Carter's Light
05/15/02: Former presidents who don't understand the word "former"
05/07/02: Ozzy deified, many mortified, drugs glorified?
05/01/02: Bush: "California here I come ... sort of"
04/27/02: The good news about conservatives versus Bush
04/17/02: While the cat's away....
04/09/02: Preview of 2004: See how Dick runs!
01/29/02: A kinder, gentler human-rights violator?
11/27/01: Military tribunals provide streamlined justice
09/07/01: Scariest animal wears pants
08/17/01: Depressed after seeing uncut version of Apocalypse Now --- and for good reason
07/20/01: The other, maybe more important, news
06/22/01: Washington's pro-Bono worship is unnerving
06/01/01: Burying conservatism
05/17/01: Ashcroft's abuse of power

© 2002, Laura Ingraham