Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 14, 2003 / 11 Shevat, 5763

Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


What have you done for the free world lately?


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Hidden biological weapons in Iraq. Nukes in North Korea. Terror from al Qaeda. These challenges combined would be overwhelming for any US president. But then add France, South Korea, Russia, the EU, and the UN to the mix and things get really dicey. "Our friends" continue to berate US foreign policy, as they remain eager to trust the pledges of dictators. The "world community" tells us to slow down in Iraq when Iraq is still lying. We are lectured endlessly about the dangers of acting unilaterally.

Yet this constant critique of US foreign policy should give way to a more pressing question of our so-called friends: What have you done for the free world lately? As long as the US willingly plays the whipping boy of our so-called allies, Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong II and terrorists around the world are emboldened, while isolationists at home are already saying "see, I told you so."

Let's take a step back to take an honest assessment of the landscape. Many of our current foreign policy messes result from the fact that we are getting no significant, practical support from any other advanced power to contain and eliminate the world's most dangerous rulers. Would it really be possible for two-bit countries like Iraq and North Korea to hold "the world" hostage if "the world" would actually stand up to them? Europe's "peace at any cost" mentality is partly the result of its resistance to American urgings, and of course its addiction to the money that Middle Eastern and Arab trade brings in. Plus, why do the heavy lifting when, in the end, Europe knows America will? (read: the American taxpayers and military).

The rules of 21st century foreign policy are getting simpler by the day: If you want a resolution passed-go to the UN. If you want the resolution enforced-go to the US. The Security Council wouldn't have passed multiple resolutions calling on Iraq to disarm if it did not believe Iraq's appetite for weapons of mass destruction and its willingness to sell them endangered the free world. Yet when Saddam Hussein failed to live up to the requirements of Resolution 1441, when he refuses to provide an accurate list of Iraqi scientists, the UN is unfazed. Hans Blix says they need more time--months, maybe another year.

How smart is that? Time, plus undeserved trust, is exactly what gave North Korea the opportunity to join the world's nukes club. As a result we find ourselves forced to bargain with a brutal regime that threatens world stability and 37,000 of our finest in South Korea. After years of UN and Clinton Administration engagement (who can forget Madeline Albright's champagne toast with Kim Jong Il?), we are at the brink of an international crisis. North Korea only decided to 'fess up when it realized that President Bush wasn't pussyfooting.

Iraq isn't North Korea--yet. With its recent history of invading its neighbor Kuwait, and bombing the Kurds with chemicals, one can only imagine what Saddam would demand as nuclear blackmail. That is where following the Europeans now will take us. When is the last time the UN or the Europeans came up with a workable, realistic approach to a major foreign policy problem? In fact, to the regular guy out there in Fly-Over Land, the more we do as a nation for the world's liberty and security, the more resentment we get in return. Superpower envy is reaching epidemic levels.

Today South Korea, for whose liberty 50,000 of our soldiers died, is more worried about the policies of George Bush than Kim Jong Il. Our soldiers report being spat upon and jeered in the streets of Seoul. Rather than rally around the US in South Korea, our "friends" are telling us to play nice. Requests to China for assistance with North Korea have fallen on deaf ears. Japan and Russia don't want to get involved. No country other than the US seems bothered by any of this.

With disturbing frequency, the US finds itself mocked, ridiculed, and undermined by the very countries whose interests we are supposedly protecting. The natural instinct of many is to say "to hell with them, we'll go it alone." But as powerful as we are, we are not powerful enough to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, or to overthrow madmen like Hussein, in the face of passive (and in many cases, active) opposition from every other major country on earth (with the exception of Britain).

In the future we should refrain from talking about how we share "common values" with so many countries that plainly do not share our values. We should continue diplomacy but not bang our heads against the wall, and certainly not relinquish any more of our sovereignty along the way. Instead we need to talk honestly about what sort of deals and payoffs countries like China, Russia, France, Germany and South Korea require before they will support us. This gives Americans some context when they hear complaints that the US is acting "against the wishes of the international community." This global village is made up of individual countries all acting out of their own self-interests, but pretending otherwise. The jig is up.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Laura Ingraham is the host of a radio show syndicated nationally by Westwood One Radio Network and the author of "The Hillary Trap: Looking for Power in All the Wrong Places". Comment by clicking here.

12/17/02: Who is the better leader: Gore or Lott?
12/10/02: Who, more than anyone else, is actively advancing the cause of civil liberties around the world?
12/04/02: 'Tis the season to hope for the worst
11/27/02: The Federal P.C. Police Versus Small Business Owners (Cont'd)
11/19/02: Bipartisan moves to reward illegals
11/13/02: Eminem, a rebel? You gotta be kidding!
11/05/02: In defense of low turnout
10/30/02: Hell, no they won't go!
10/22/02: Where are the moderate Muslims?
10/15/02: California dreaming, cont'd
10/08/02: Slick Willie's running
10/01/02: Euro-worries about wall flower status
09/26/02: How lucky we are that the Straight Talk Express drove off the cliff!
09/18/02: What Jackson and Sharpton know about conservatives
09/12/02: The Today Show v. guns
08/27/02: Bush not attending the UN-sponsored "bash Amerika" conference!?
08/20/02: The NEA: Let the anti-American indoctrination begin!
08/13/02: Bubba's revenge
08/07/02: Bilingual bust continues its drag on our schools
07/30/02: Dems love for big lawyers=big opportunity
07/23/02: No time for vacation
07/16/02: Is Homeland Security all wet?
06/25/02: The firing season has arrived
06/18/02: Picking the next chief
06/11/02: Intelligence coup, with much more to do
06/07/02: The Bush administration's foul ball
05/30/02: Post-feminism in the aftermath of 9-11
05/23/02: The press gunning for Ashcroft
05/19/02: El Jefe basks in Carter's Light
05/15/02: Former presidents who don't understand the word "former"
05/07/02: Ozzy deified, many mortified, drugs glorified?
05/01/02: Bush: "California here I come ... sort of"
04/27/02: The good news about conservatives versus Bush
04/17/02: While the cat's away....
04/09/02: Preview of 2004: See how Dick runs!
01/29/02: A kinder, gentler human-rights violator?
11/27/01: Military tribunals provide streamlined justice
09/07/01: Scariest animal wears pants
08/17/01: Depressed after seeing uncut version of Apocalypse Now --- and for good reason
07/20/01: The other, maybe more important, news
06/22/01: Washington's pro-Bono worship is unnerving
06/01/01: Burying conservatism
05/17/01: Ashcroft's abuse of power

© 2002, Laura Ingraham