Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 5, 2002 / 29 Mar-Cheshvan, 5763

Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


In defense of low turnout


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Soon you'll hear from political sages nationwide that the sky is falling because in their view voter turnout was unacceptably low. They will try to convince us this means-gasp!-our "system isn't working," that democracy is being derailed, or even that in some states the people's real choice lost.

But all the flop sweat over turnout is silly. Sure, the parties want their base to vote because this is a close election. But there is no reason to believe that low voter turnout is a bad thing in general. People show up to vote when they are inspired -- either by the charisma (or repellant nature) of a particular candidate or by an issue they think isn't being addressed by the status quo. And many Americans vote because they believe it is their civic duty.

Some important issues face the voters this mid-term election season -- war, homeland security and the economy. This makes it all the more frustrating to political commentators on the right and left who are predicting a turnout as low as 40 percent nationally. This is not to say that parties aren't right to fret about turnout, especially in a year when control of both houses of Congress is up for grabs. "Close Election Turns on Voter Turnout" screamed a headline in Monday's Washington Post. "Mid-Terms Hinge on Voter Turnout" according to the Boston Globe. You don't say.

The idea that Americans aren't making their views known or are disengaged is ludicrous. There was a big voter turnout in Louisiana when David Duke was on the ballot. The people rose up. Across America, turnout this year promises to be high in certain states and localities -- in South Dakota (because it's a Bush v. Daschle proxy) and in little places like Calvert County, Maryland where the turnout might be as high as 71 percent because of hotly contested races for sheriff and county commissioner.

If an American over the age of 18 chooses not to vote, we should presume he or she just didn't think there was enough at stake. It doesn't mean the country is going to hell in a hand basket. In fact, it probably means that things are going reasonably well. Well enough not to upset the status quo.

It is true that more people might be motivated to head to the polls if Democrats and Republicans devoted more time to addressing some of the big issues or if they offered some bold solutions to the problems confronting the country. Neither side is really telling us how to deal with the millions of illegals here or how to find the 300,000 who have been ordered deported. Neither side wants to be specific about meaningful tax reform. Democrats don't want to risk questioning how our military is being strained by the ever-expanding war on terror.

No doubt Dems remember the electoral pain of 1994 -- a payback for Hillary Healthcare. Ditto for Republicans' Congressional losses in 1996 -- a payback for Gingrich's role in shutting down the government.

Nationwide efforts are underway to make voting easier, less of a burden. Nationwide there are more allegations of voter fraud. The two are undoubtedly related. Every time you take down a barrier to vote, it makes it easier to commit fraud.

In California, where everyone wants to vote for no one in the governor's race, voters will decide on Proposition 52, which would allow Californians both to register to vote and cast their ballots on election day (Minnesota has a similar system already in place). Just what we need-a new law that will ensure that poll workers are more overwhelmed and voters more confused.

Some who wail about low voter turnout claim that the "will of the people is being thwarted" or "the people aren't being heard." Again, there is little evidence of this. Look at how the Dems lined up behind the Administration on Iraq -- do you think they weren't listening to the "will of the people" as reflected in countless public opinion polls on the subject? Ditto for the Administration's eventual turnaround on the Enron debacle -- President Bush couldn't ignore the polls forever. The public demanded a firm Administration response. The Administration gave it to them.

People vote when they feel like they need to vote. It should require a bit of an effort. Why is democracy enhanced by encouraging the truly disengaged to vote? Why should we really be concerned about being governed as result of the votes of those who are truly motivated and interested in what's happening around them?

As with everything on our "to do" lists, we weigh the inconvenience against our other obligations, values and concerns. That, in and of itself, is very American.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Laura Ingraham is the host of a radio show syndicated nationally by Westwood One Radio Network. Comment by clicking here.

10/30/02: Hell, no they won't go!
10/22/02: Where are the moderate Muslims?
10/15/02: California dreaming, cont'd
10/08/02: Slick Willie's running
10/01/02: Euro-worries about wall flower status
09/26/02: How lucky we are that the Straight Talk Express drove off the cliff!
09/18/02: What Jackson and Sharpton know about conservatives
09/12/02: The Today Show v. guns
08/27/02: Bush not attending the UN-sponsored "bash Amerika" conference!?
08/20/02: The NEA: Let the anti-American indoctrination begin!
08/13/02: Bubba's revenge
08/07/02: Bilingual bust continues its drag on our schools
07/30/02: Dems love for big lawyers=big opportunity
07/23/02: No time for vacation
07/16/02: Is Homeland Security all wet?
06/25/02: The firing season has arrived
06/18/02: Picking the next chief
06/11/02: Intelligence coup, with much more to do
06/07/02: The Bush administration's foul ball
05/30/02: Post-feminism in the aftermath of 9-11
05/23/02: The press gunning for Ashcroft
05/19/02: El Jefe basks in Carter's Light
05/15/02: Former presidents who don't understand the word "former"
05/07/02: Ozzy deified, many mortified, drugs glorified?
05/01/02: Bush: "California here I come ... sort of"
04/27/02: The good news about conservatives versus Bush
04/17/02: While the cat's away....
04/09/02: Preview of 2004: See how Dick runs!
01/29/02: A kinder, gentler human-rights violator?
11/27/01: Military tribunals provide streamlined justice
09/07/01: Scariest animal wears pants
08/17/01: Depressed after seeing uncut version of Apocalypse Now --- and for good reason
07/20/01: The other, maybe more important, news
06/22/01: Washington's pro-Bono worship is unnerving
06/01/01: Burying conservatism
05/17/01: Ashcroft's abuse of power

© 2002, Laura Ingraham