Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 13, 2004 / 28 Tishrei, 5765

Mort Zuckerman

Mort Zuckerman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The politics of cynicism | With the last syllable of last week's second presidential debate still being sifted, we have too much confusion about where the country is going — and the most important single domestic issue remains on hold: the looming crisis in our national finances.

Who's right — the optimists (read Republicans) or the pessimists (that would be the Democrats)? Optimists see a resilient economy turning the corner despite record energy prices and slowing global trade. They find comfort in the falling unemployment rate, rising wages, declining long-term interest rates, and the low inflation rate that's boosting our buying power. The result? Consumers are spending more on cars, on housing, and at the mall. Even the Federal Reserve believes the economy "appears to have regained some traction."

The pessimists see a very different picture. Weak job and wage growth merely tops their list of complaints. Despite unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus, Stephen Roach of Morgan Stanley points out, payrolls are as much as 8 million workers below the path of typical hiring-led recoveries since World War II, while wages have increased as little as 20 percent of the average gains seen during the comparable stages of the past six recoveries. The budget surplus President Bush inherited has been transformed into a huge deficit of 4 percent of gross domestic product, an anemic national savings rate of 2 percent of GDP, and a mesmerizing current account deficit of 5.7 percent of GDP.

Girlie men? There have been dramatic improvements in corporate profits and finances, and business investment is now growing at a very healthy 11 percent, but corporate America is still not confident about what lies ahead and distrusts the sustainability of the economic pickup. What has been extraordinary is the increase in productivity, which truly vindicates John Updike's observation that all blessings are mixed. It explains why corporate profits have rebounded twice as much as anybody expected but also why businesses have been able to meet demand while restraining payrolls to levels unseen in decades.

Donate to JWR

So is this a "macho man" or a "girlie man" economy? George Bush and John Kerry both take very predictable positions. Focusing on the fact that we have clearly come out of the recession he inherited, Bush ascribes the minirecovery largely to his big tax cuts. Insisting that the recovery is weak and faltering, Kerry points to slow job creation and wage regeneration and to Bush's huge budget deficits.

Sadly, both candidates barely address our biggest long-term financial problem — how to contain those enormous deficits in the face of the soaring costs of Social Security and Medicare. Neither candidate has proposed a credible plan to deal with the deficit, tolerable in the short run of a recession but insupportable over the long term. Both candidates propose programs to cut the deficit in half over the next four years but offer few specifics as to how they would do it. You know why? Both candidates are unwilling to address the question of reforming Medicare and Social Security or, alternatively, raising taxes on millions of Americans so that we can meet these obligations.

How serious are Republicans and Democrats about the deficit? This serious: Last month, members of both parties in Congress voted not to cut the deficit but to increase it! They passed yet another tax cut, this one with a price tag of a whopping $146 billion over the next five years. This is Round 2 of the fabled Bush tax package that was promised not to cost more than $350 billion over 10 years. The Republican leaders in Congress jury-rigged that bill so that the bulk of its most popular tax breaks would expire during this election year, knowing full well that their wobbly colleagues on the other side of the aisle wouldn't dare risk looking like tax hikers with an election hanging over them. This procedural disgrace was all the more shameless for the fact that Republicans and Democrats conspired in leapfrogging committee hearings, floor debates, and amendments and, in a breathtaking stroke of cynicism remarkable even for Capitol Hill, tacked the tax bill onto another bill — one intended to help the working poor.

But wait — it gets better. The working poor get the smallest slice of the benefits from this new legislation. Kerry, who regularly decries the Bush budget deficits, supported the bill. The candidate who wanted to scrap the tax cuts for those earning over $200,000 a year supported a bill where more than half of the tax cuts go to the 13 percent of taxpayers who earn more than $100,000 a year.

It brings to mind Lily Tomlin's wonderful remark about life in our nation's capital: "No matter how cynical you are, it is impossible to keep up." Sure is.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Mort Zuckerman is editor-in-chief and publisher of U.S. News and World Report. Send your comments to him by clicking here.



© 2004, Mortimer Zuckerman