Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Nov. 2, 2000 / 3 Mar-Cheshvan, 5761

Michael Kelly

Michael Kelly
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The Democrats' delusion -- WITH LESS than a week to go, why is George W. Bush the slight favorite to become the leader of the free world?

He seems to be a nice enough guy. He is easy on the eyes and on the nerves, too. He can be pretty funny. He makes friends easily; people like him. He seems to be fundamentally honest. He is a decent man. He is loyal. He is a reasonably effective and popular governor of a large state.

Yet there is something about him that gives even some determined Republicans a powerful twinge. He reminds an observer of the amiable but slightly dim young men who populated the novels of P. G. Wodehouse--Bertram Wooster, and Catsmeat Potter and Reginald Fotheringay-Phipps and all the rest. Regarding Wooster, Wodehouse once noted, one was forced to question whether man was really God's last word. So too with Bush. The things that fall out of his mouth are a marvel and a worry:

On education: "My education program will resignate among all parents." On foreign policy: "A key to foreign policy is to rely on reliance." On whether Social Security recipients will receive the same benefits under his plan as under the current system: "Maybe, maybe not." On his budget proposal: "It's clearly a budget. It's got a lot of numbers in it."

So why is this less than overwhelming candidate outpolling Al Gore, a smarty with 10 times the experience in government, including two terms as vice president in an administration that has presided over a period of such prosperity? Because, going into 2000, the Democrats made the same mistake that the Republicans made going into 1996; they believed their own propaganda. The Big Four of Democratic self-delusion:

* Bill Clinton. Core Democrats adore Clinton and accept his view of his disgrace--that he was the victim of what amounted to a right-wing coup attempt. It was natural for these Democrats to believe the public would in 2000 punish Republicans for the impeachment. But a majority of the public, the polls show, does not mind at all that Clinton was impeached (but not convicted and removed), and this majority's opinion of Clinton is closer to the Republican view than to the Democratic: He may have performed well as president, but he disgraced the office and shamed the country. Gore is hopelessly tied to Clinton, and whenever it seems people might be forgetting Clinton's scandal, the old narcissist reminds them with a fresh complaint about his mistreatment. In the latest such, the president railed to a writer for Esquire magazine that the Republicans had "never apologized to the country for impeachment." Mr. Helpful.

* Al Gore. Democratic loyalists may not adore Gore, but they like him fine and assumed the voters liked him fine, too. But the voters didn't know Gore that well, and when they did get to know him, a lot of them decided he was not likable. More attention should have been paid to the fact that Gore was never popular with his colleagues in the House and Senate.

* Natural Democratic demagogic superiority. With the help of myth-making media, Democrats came to see themselves as the inevitable victors in any public relations contest with those bumble-footed Republicans. But the party's success rested heavily on its ability to convincingly portray Republicans as monstrous creatures. This was possible because Clinton was a demagogue of unusual skill, and the Republicans were frequently represented by figures of unusual unattractiveness--e.g., Newt Gingrich. Gore isn't Clinton and Bush isn't Gingrich. Despite impressively vicious efforts, Democrats so far have been unable to convince enough voters that a "compassionate conservative" who was returned to the Texas governor's office with 68 percent of the vote fits the monster's mask.

* Above all, the issues. The Democrats told themselves that the voters generally sided with them on the issues. The Gore campaign, on the advice of strategists such as the pollster Stan Greenberg, bet on old-fashioned Democratic class-based liberalism. But the country remains more conservative than liberal in more places, and the majority view on such issues as taxes and big government jibes more with Republican philosophy than Democratic. This was rediscovered late in the game; thus the ludicrous sight of Gore in recent weeks assuring voters of his friendliness to gun owners and promising that, as president, he will not add a single new employee to the federal government.

If Gore wins, he will owe victory to extraordinary turnout by black and labor voters and to the apparent weaknesses of his opponent. But the myths the Democrats carried into the year are exploded already.

Michael Kelly is the editor of National Journal. Send your comments to him by clicking here.


10/26/00: Phony Truce
10/19/00: The Talking Cure
10/12/00: Doves' Day of Reckoning
10/05/00: Conan the veep
09/28/00: Dumb vs. Dishonest
09/21/00: Flapping furiously
09/14/00: Down AlGore's Memory Hole
08/24/00: AlGore's Flex-O-Joe
08/17/00: The Joyful Clinton Nation
08/09/00: A Calculated Risk
08/03/00: New Hope for Nice Guys
07/27/00: But What About Dad?
07/20/00: U.S. Handiwork In Sierra Leone
07/13/00: President With a Porpoise
07/06/00: The Importance of Being Earnest
06/29/00: A Press Obsession With the Death Penalty
06/21/00: Gore and the Goodies
06/15/00: Network Snooze
06/01/00: Sunshine on My Shoulders
05/24/00: Last Chance for a Hardened Prevaricator
05/17/00: Cuomo's Thought Police
05/10/00: Hammering DeLay
05/04/00: Some Closing Thoughts
04/28/00: Endangering Elian
04/19/00: Imitation Activism
04/12/00: Why they hate Bubba
04/05/00: Census and nonesense
03/29/00: The Stiffs and Their Statuettes
03/15/00: Anarchy in Kosovo
03/08/00: Reform joke
03/01/00:The Pinhead Factor
03/01/00: The Christian Right: Past Its Prime . . .
02/24/00: McCain's Majority
02/16/00: Sharpton's Supplicants
02/09/00: The GOP Pilgrims' Sad Tale
02/02/00: Fodder For the GOP
01/26/00: Million-Dollar Mediocrity
01/19/00: Campaign Reform: Let's Pretend
01/12/00: Never Again? Oh, Never Mind
01/05/00: Turn Off, Tune Out, Drop In
12/22/99: Gore's TV Gambit
12/15/99: Campaigns Do Clarify
12/08/99: Kosovo's Killers
12/01/99: Not Ready for Prime Time?
11/24/99: The Company He Keeps
11/17/99: Republican Illusion
11/10/99: The Know-Nothing Media
11/03/99: Necessary Partisanship
10/27/99: Buchanan's Gift to George W. Bush
10/21/99: Who are the real friends of the poor?
10/14/99: Gore's 'courage'!?
10/08/99: Republican Stunts
09/23/99: Buchanan's folly
09/16/99: Beatty and Buchanan: That's Entertainment!
09/09/99: Puerto Rico Surprise (Cont'd)
09/02/99: Puerto Rico Surprise
08/12/99:The Age of No Class
08/05/99: Assessing Welfare Reform
07/29/99: On the Wrong Side
07/21/99: Mass Sentimentality
07/15/99: Blame Hillary
07/08/99: Guide to the Arts: For Your Summer Reading . . .
06/30/99: A Perfectly Clintonian Doctrine
06/25/99:Smorgasbord by the Sea
06/16/99: A National Calamity
06/09/99: Stumbling Forward
06/02/99: Commencement '90s-Style
05/26/99: Will we ever learn? Clintochio is a lying ...
05/19/99: Comforting Milosevic
05/13/99: Short-Order Strategists
05/06/99: Four Revolting Spectacles

©1999, Washington Post Co.