Jewish World Review March 14, 2003 / 10 Adar II, 5763
Genuinely in charge
Last weekend, there was a series of
newspaper articles in all the major papers that struck me as odd. They
attempted to describe how the president is doing during these vestibular
days before war with Iraq. He is relaxed. He is the same in public as in
private. He is comfortable with his decisions.
Well, of course he is. George W. Bush is a very straightforward
man. He is among the most genuine men to reside at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
since Warren Gamaliel Harding. Wait, wait, that is not meant as a slight.
Coolidge and Hoover were genuine. Truman was genuine. Ronald Reagan was a
genuine guy and perhaps even Bush I, though Bush I has held so many
positions in public life it would be difficult for him not to adopt certain
artifices. Bush II is, however, down home and genuine. People who meet him
usually recognize this. He does not take credit for things he has not done,
and some of the admirable things that he does he does not boast about.
He has come to the conclusion that terrorists and "those who
harbor terrorists" are a threat to his fellow citizens. Like only one other
president in the three decades during which terrorism has claimed the lives
of four thousand Americans (about a thousand before 9-11), he intends to
treat terror as an act of war not a crime. That other president was Ronald
President Reagan sent American warplanes in April 1986 to bomb
Col. Qaddafi's compound after the Libyan dictator capped numerous bellicose
acts worldwide by sending agents to a West Berlin disco frequented by
American soldiers. There they set off a bomb that killed two American
soldiers and wounded some 200 innocent people, among them 50 more American
soldiers. Even in that surgical military strike against a dictator who had
been terrorizing the world, certain European sophisticates were against us,
most memorably Jacques Chirac, then only the French prime minister of
Chirac denied French airspace to our strike force, causing its
pilots to fly 2,400 more miles to attack Qaddafi. Chirac's motives were the
same then as they are today: commerce, moral posturing and procrastination.
At the time in this column, I described Qaddafi's network of terror as "a
new abomination in the annals of war."
Expressing the disappointment that millions of Americans feel
toward now-President Chirac, I wondered if the French "would have allowed
our planes to fly over a more precisely designated rout, leapfrogging such
places as Ardennes, Suresnes, Rhone, the Lorraine Valley, St. James, St.
Laurent and Espinal. All contain military cemeteries where American men lie
face up, forever gazing into the skies of France. Surely these men would not
object if they were to see once more the underbelly of an American bomber
flying far from home to defend the values of the West."
The lines struck a chord then. Pilots from the USS John F.
Kennedy wrote me to tell me that they posted the column on their bulletin
board. I reproduce part of it in hopes of stirring today's pilots as they
prepare to strike against an even more monstrous brute than Qaddafi. The
American military has served the cause of freedom as few other military
forces ever have.
I also reproduce these lines to remind us that the obduracy of
certain European powers is not new. Nor is their reliance on American
resolve. There is also another reason to recall our action against Libya. It
sent Qaddafi hunkering. The fiery brute lost his fire. Reagan went on to
stare down the Soviet Union, which gave up on the Cold War a few years
later. Peace unfortunately is not secured by French procrastination. They
might have learned that from their decade of appeasement in the 1930s.
The resolute man in the White House is of course mounting a
vastly larger strike against Saddam today than President Reagan mounted
against Libya's tin pot colonel. Yet he has more of the world on his side.
He has most of Europe, the Arab emirates andJordan, and Turkey probably will
be with us. Students of war as knowledgeable as Britain's John Keegan
estimate the fighting will last only a week or so. First will come the most
formidable aerial attack in history. Then air-mobile assaults will be
mounted with heavily armed helicopters and elite troops from our airborne
divisions and special-ops units. Finally, our ground forces will roll
against what is left of the Iraqi army. Within a few days, Baghdad will be
surrounded. Saddam will be dead or under arrest.
The great questions that now cannot be answered are: Will the
Western alliance recover? Will terrorism subside? Will Iraq accept peace and
civilized government? My guess is that the answer to all three questions is
yes, but the work that follows the war will be as arduous as the work that
led up to it.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Bob Tyrrell is editor in chief of The American Spectator. Comment by clicking here.
03/10/03: Stalin and Saddam
03/05/03: They just cannot stomach a protracted alliance with the Bushies
02/25/03: Identity gridlock
02/18/03: People calling Dean a fruitcake are underestimating his political savvy
02/13/03: The new political establishment
01/30/03: The time is now
01/27/03: Witnessing self-love by people completely incapable of self-criticism
01/21/03: Of course our kiddies are depressed
01/13/03: Why is it that Official Washington still believes that a tax reduction means a revenue reduction?
01/02/03: Missing Moi
12/27/02: The grizzled and menacing-looking senator in Confederate drag is … a Dem
12/24/02: Uprooting Christianity in the Holy Land
12/20/02: Under fire, Lott showed an ignobleness that is embarrassing
11/26/02: Bartley's enemies have been routed
11/14/02: Clarence Thomas and the segregationist Mississippi sheriff
11/07/02: I muffed up
10/31/02: Is the American university turning its back on change, on progress?
10/24/02: So why aren't the Dems buoyant?
10/17/02: Mourning the loss of the "yellow-belly"
10/10/02: American politics at its most ignominious
10/03/02: A man above the law, a bully
09/26/02: Is Bob Greene a victim of an anti-Clinton backlash?
09/19/02: I knew Mafiosi and …
09/12/02: Chickens and poseurs
09/05/02: Sympathizing with the Europols
08/29/02: 9-11 did not change us forever
08/22/02: Public persons frivoling with serious matters
08/15/02: Beachcombing among the fat of the land
08/08/02: They pave the way for corruption, not personal responsibility
08/01/02: Believing the unbelievable
07/25/02: The congressional posse comitatus
07/18/02: Cosmopolitan Arab fashion
07/11/02: What the prez actually knows
07/04/02: The vindication of a truly original thinker
06/27/02: The perfect book for Hillary
06/20/02: To say that they were ordinary is not to slight them
06/13/02: Daschle must begin to act like an adult
06/06/02: Lack of "intelligence" --- and sheer stupidity
05/30/02: Revealing a carefully guarded media secret
05/23/02: In these times, thank Heaven for Clinton!
05/16/02: Fast Times at the Church of the Nativity
05/09/02: "Name the Prettiest Suicide Bomber"
05/02/02: Vindication for the Boy Scouts
04/25/02: A topic almost no other columnist will touch
04/18/02: 'Conventional Wisdom' --- and those who defy it
04/11/02: Let the Sun shine in
04/05/02: Hooded men of color in sheets
04/01/02: A McCain-Feingold Act for Hollywood
03/21/02: Yakkin' on Yates
03/15/02: No role for Paul Volcker in Enron: the movie
03/07/02: My membership in the Communist Party U.S.A.
02/27/02: This award is bestowed by 'contrarians'
02/21/02: Mike Tyson: Made for Washington?
02/14/02: Enron as underdog?
02/07/02: Freed from the presence of money -- hard or soft -- most politicians would be just as bad
01/31/02: Needed: Bush to make a preemptive strike against his enemies …. Ones who'd like to see him fail even during war
01/24/02: Hucksters will move on to make their next marks
01/17/02: Debonair prez should begin to do the High Life
01/10/02: Move over Twinkies --- "the acne medicine made him do it!"
01/03/02: Leaving the Nazis looking comparatively humane
12/27/01: A "self-made journalist"
12/20/01: Calamities and unanticipated benefits
12/13/01: America's grief ought not to give comfort to those who caused it
12/06/01: Leahy, the strict civil libertarian!? A short-term exploiter of the Constitution is more like it
11/29/01: Welcome to Afghan, Maryland?
11/26/01: So, why don't more folks hate us?
11/15/01: America's quagmire and other certainties
11/09/01: No longer the smug statists, the prodigal Keynesians?
11/01/01: The New Seriousness
10/25/01: Bright lights and the Taliban
10/18/01: Is bin-Laden propaganda from Western intelligence?
10/12/01: No yellow ribbons
10/05/01: Bubba's back --- again!
09/28/01: Exposing peacetime's frauds
09/21/01: So protected, we're vulnerable
09/14/01: At Barbara Olson's home
09/11/01: Duh! All conservatives are racists
08/31/01: Arafat's terrorists have created their own hell
08/24/01: Time for some political prophecy
08/16/01: They claim to be doing so much good
08/10/01: Visiting the source of the White House braintrust
08/03/01: Morality and reality
07/31/01: Blinded by success?
07/24/01: The latest Kennedy capitulation in Massachusetts
07/13/01: Talk about tawdry
07/06/01: Delighting in the Dictator
06/29/01: The Godphobes
06/21/01: Fashionable Washington is sempiternally in a stew
06/15/01: The limits of hypocrisy
06/08/01: Flagging our general apathy
© 2001, Creators Syndicate