Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review June 7, 2000 / 4 Sivan, 5760

Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Coming home to school --
THE TOP THREE FINISHERS in last week's National Spelling Bee are educated at home. The winner, 12-year-old George Thampy of Missouri, placed second the previous week in the National Geography Bee.

You might ask what difference this makes in the day of "spell-check'' and the Internet. Plenty.

Contrast the pursuit of excellence and unique personal attention that are the norm among home schoolers with what occurs in government schools, where the curriculum is often dumbed-down and non-academic subjects take time away from acquiring real knowledge and the endangered species known as wisdom.

In Massachusetts, the state board of education is requiring math teachers in secondary schools to take the same exams they are giving their students to discover if the teachers know the material. It would appear not. Thirty percent of the students are failing math statewide.

In Montgomery County, Maryland, an elementary school principal has stepped down following allegations that students had been coached and allowed to cheat on state achievement tests in order to bolster the school's prestige. The kids blew the whistle on their authority figures.

Those who are part of, or politically beholden to, the education establishment are worried about home schooling and how well children who participate do. President Clinton thinks home schoolers should be made to "prove they are learning on a regular basis'' or be forced to go to government schools. This is surprising, given that home-schooled children consistently score higher on standardized tests than their government-school counterparts.

As for the myth that home-schooled kids aren't getting socialized, an ABC News reporter recently asked one how he feels about that. He indicated he is happy to avoid school shootings and competition over clothes and cliques. Home-schooled children have plenty of time to socialize, but in a different environment.

The number of children taught at home has increased from a minuscule 15,000 in 1978 to 1.5 million today. Academic resources are better than ever, with Web pages offering information about good textbooks, teaching aids and supplemental materials. But mostly home schooling forges a special bond between parents and their children. It communicates to children how important they are that parents invest so much time in them. It also earns dividends for parents who are able to shape their own children's intellectual and moral development and not turn that responsibility over to an agent of the state, who, no matter how good a teacher, will always be required to teach the state's values and the state's perspective on subjects from sex to history and biology.

Children educated at home are some of the friendliest, most articulate and socially comfortable people I've met. They look you in the eye. They speak in complete sentences, eschewing verbal crutches such as "you know'' and "she goes.'' They aren't robots, but neither are they freaks. They are, I suspect, the way most parents would like their children to be: smart, kind, courteous, respectful and seeking to live a moral life.

A huge political battle is just beginning over school choice. Most people think American public education was here at our nation's founding. In fact, the early American schools were mostly religious, private, controlled by parents and in competition with each other. The objective was to educate students, not establish an education bureaucracy and careers for teachers. The public schools were started in order to mainstream immigrants, inculcate them with American values and erase cultural diversity for the sake of a united nation. Parents were seen as "unfit guardians'' of their own children, according to Andrew Coulson in "Education: The Unknown History.''

As economists Rose and Milton Friedman have written, "Nearly 150 years after its inception, the public school system has segregated the population more deeply between the `have's and the have-not's' by creating a gulf of learning deprivation too wide to cross for the many low-income, minority children whom it fails.'' Their solution (see their Web page: is school choice, including home schooling. Parents would again be given the option of deciding where their children should be educated and the financial resources to help make their choice a reality.

That can only spell "s-u-c-c-e-s-s'' for the children and the country.

Cal Thomas Archives



© 2000, LA TimesSyndicate