Jewish World Review June 18, 2004 /29 Sivan, 5764

Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Silencing whom?

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | With all the noise being made — from traffic noise to Al Gore's ranting — you might never suspect that there was a National Day of Silence. What you might also not suspect is that this day is observed in schools and colleges across the country, where students agree to remain silent for a day in order to show support for homosexuals.

The idea is that people who are sexually different have been silenced by society and that the students who observe the National Day of Silence are showing that they are on the side of the gays, lesbians, etc. The schools themselves promote and cooperate with this exercise, allowing students to hand cards to their teachers when they do not respond to questions asked in class.

Theoretically, this is a protest against the silencing of people because of their sexual orientation. But only theoretically is this about free speech.

A sophomore at a San Diego high school discovered the hard way just how theoretical the concern about free speech is. He did not agree with the view of homosexuality being promoted by his school and wore a T-shirt that said so — silently. Yet he was suspended.

The front of his T-shirt said: "I will not accept what God has condemned" and the back said: "Homosexuality is shameful."

On what grounds was he suspended? The school's speech code bans statements that promote "hate" or "violence."

Such speech codes — which have spread through schools and colleges nationwide — are nothing more and nothing less than thought control by those who want no competition against the indoctrination that they are promoting under the guise of education.

The particular issue at any given time might be race, sex, or any number of other subjects on which there is a politically correct line — from which dissent will not be tolerated. Disagreements about policies like affirmative action or gay marriage can be redefined as showing hatred for minorities, gays, or women — and therefore as creating a "hostile environment" for them, impairing their learning.


Donate to JWR


Here and there the courts have shot down some of these vaguely worded speech codes but that may just force some rewriting of the language. The real power remains with campus kangaroo courts that loosely define racism, homophobia or whatever other buzzwords can be used to justify the punishment of students who step out of line ideologically.

Meanwhile, members of any minority group can shout any insult or obscenity they want against whites and these speech codes will do nothing. Radical feminists can accuse any given man, or men in general, of anything under the sun and nothing will be done, even if the charges are proved false. Homosexuals can shout louder than ever that they are being silenced — and shout it in four-letter words — and nothing will be done.

The ostensible basis for these speech codes is as phony as the loose and biased standards applied. What problems were these speech codes supposed to be solving? Who was suffering what?

Since I was a black student at predominantly white high schools and predominantly white universities before these speech codes came in, you might think that I would have encountered the perils from which speech codes are supposed to protect minorities. But I neither saw nor experienced those terrible dangers. Nor have I seen minorities or women so fragile that a disagreement over policy issues would crush their spirits and impair their learning.

Speech codes are meant to silence any criticism of the brainwashing and double standards that schools and colleges have increasingly practiced. That is what it is all about.

The student suspended in San Diego was not advocating violence, much less practicing any. He was criticizing the brainwashing. That was what he was suspended for.

Most parents have no idea how widespread and dogmatic are the programs to change their children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic in politically correct circles. That is what needs to be stopped, even more than the speech codes.

Conservatives are sadly mistaken when they try to get schools to teach abstinence when many students can't even spell abstinence. Schools need to teach academic skills, not indoctrinate.

Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Thomas Sowell, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, is author of several books, including his latest, "Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One." (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.)

Up

Thomas Sowell Archives

© 2002, Creators Syndicate