|
|
|
|
Jewish World Review March 15, 2005 / 4 Adar II, 5765
Thomas Sowell
Cynicism exposed
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
Back in the 1980s a White House staffer told about a revealing
incident on Capitol Hill. The staffer was walking down the corridors of one
of the buildings on the Hill when a Senator motioned to him to step inside
his office.
"I'm going to make a speech next week, denouncing the effect of
the President's policies on my constituents," the Senator said. He added:
"Pay it no mind."
My own experience with political cynicism in Washington came a
few years earlier, back in 1976, when I was nominated to the Federal Trade
Commission by President Ford. At a private meeting with a Democratic
Congressional staffer for the Senate committee in charge of confirming my
nomination, the staffer gave me the word.
"We have gone over your record with a fine-toothed comb," he
said frankly, "and, since we could find nothing to object to, we are just
not going to hold hearings at all."
He explained that, since this was an election year and they
expected their candidate Jimmy Carter to win, they would just sit on
my nomination until Carter became President, so that he could then appoint
his own man to the FTC. Which he did.
Anyone who does not understand the utter cynicism of politics
does not understand politics. An education on that subject can be found in
Mona Charen's incisive new book, "Do-Gooders." (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.)
Ms. Charen's book is about the enormous damage done by liberal
social policies from the 1960s on, but it is also about the shameless
demagoguery unleashed against those who have dared to oppose the liberal
agenda or reveal its failures. Examples range from cynical lies about
judicial nominees to the biggest big lie of our time, the claim that black
voters were "disenfranchised" by Republicans in Florida during the 2000
elections.
Depicting judicial nominees as being against civil rights and
therefore implicitly racist is a political tactic that has been used
cynically and successfully, even against judges with a history of being in
favor of civil rights and who have even had the endorsements of civil rights
leaders like Thurgood Marshall and Charles Evers, brother of slain civil
rights leader Medgar Evers.
The most famous example was the use of the anti-civil rights
charge against Judge Robert Bork during his confirmation hearings as a
nominee for the Supreme Court in 1987. It is a matter of public record that,
before he became a judge, Robert Bork had filed briefs on the side of the
NAACP in a number of civil rights cases.
Even though Judge Bork was endorsed by the most famous civil
rights attorney in history Thurgood Marshall that meant absolutely
nothing politically. His opponents couldn't care less about his civil rights
record, except as something to twist in order to deny him a place on the
Supreme Court.
The same game was played, years later, when Mississippi Judge
Charles Pickering was nominated to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals and
rejected by the Democrats who controlled the Senate Judiciary Committee in
2002.
Back in the days of the civil rights struggle in Mississippi in
the 1960s, Charles Pickering not only risked his political career by
speaking out for civil rights, he risked his life. When Judge Pickering's
nomination came under political attack in Washington, decades later, local
black leaders in Mississippi came to his defense. One said: "I can't believe
the man they're describing in Washington is the same one I've known for
years."
Pickering's actual civil rights record, which had been praised
by Mississippi civil rights leader Charles Evers, had nothing to do with the
opposition to him. Liberals were afraid that someone with Judge Pickering's
judicial philosophy might not rule in favor of abortion their real litmus
test and if depicting him as someone opposed to civil rights would stop
him, so be it.
The most successful political demagoguery of our time has been
the claim that black voters were "disenfranchised" in Florida during the
2000 elections. Mona Charen's book examines that claim in detail. The Civil
Rights Commission issued a report repeating that claim after hearings in
which not a single black voter testified to being personally denied the
vote.
"Do-Gooders" shows not only the destructive consequences of
liberal policies on crime, education and welfare, it shows the corrupting
cynicism used to try to keep the liberal agenda afloat.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Thomas Sowell, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, is author of several books, including his latest, "Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One." (Click HERE to purchase. Sales help fund JWR.) To comment please click here.
|