Jewish World Review June 1, 2005/ 23 Iyar
Senate truce foreshadows 2008 showdown
There's not much that can surprise me today when discussing local or national politics with someone who holds opposite views, but on the evening of May 25, at the Gilman School's baseball fields, I was uncharacteristically at a loss for words.
While the kids were taking batting practice, a friend and I rehashed the judicial filibuster compromise in the U.S. Senate, and it was hardly a shock that this fellow, a centrist Democrat who was still smarting over John Kerry's lackluster campaign last year, was relieved at the deal struck by 14 senators. In truth, I thought the entire controversy was politics as usual, a magnificent opportunity for politicianson both sidesto mug for the cameras and sanctimoniously refer to the Founding Fathers, when the reality is that this particular carnival will return to Washington upon the occasion of a Supreme Court vacancy. I'd have preferred a clear GOP victory, but it wasn't the end of the world.
My buddy wasn't so cavalier. "I was on pins and needles last weekend," he said, chilled by the sight of Senate leaders Bill Frist and Harry Reid crossing swords on the television talk shows. "It hasn't been since the Cuban Missile Crisis that I've been so worried about the fate of the country." It doesn't make much sense to engage in vigorous debate with the father of your own son's friend and teammate, so I mentally regrouped, ignoring the lunacy of comparing a Congressional procedural fight with potential nuclear war, and instead switched gears and brought up the ramifications for the 2008 election.
The hard-core bases of both parties have magnified the impact of the temporary Senate truce, with the religious right and virulently anti-Bush left apoplectic, both insisting they were betrayed, while the third political partythe mediatoasted the beauty of bipartisanship. The Sun's May 25 editorial ("A chance to start over") was typical of many daily newspapers last week. Proving that hyperbole is not a lost art, the writer began, "It wasn't exactly on a par with the American Revolution, but the nation nonetheless owes a debt of gratitude to the centrist militia that rode to the rescue Monday and fended off a grave threat to federal checks and balances."
What nonsense. The significance of last week's "showdown" was that it officially began the race among Republicans for the 2008 presidential nomination. (On the Democratic side, Sen. Hillary Clinton unless a miracle occurs and she's defeated next year for reelection is the de facto front-runner and had no need to play a prominent role in the "nuclear option" fight.)
This is a minority view among conservatives, but I don't think there's any doubt that Sen. John McCain was by far the biggest beneficiary among the numerous potential candidates to succeed Bush. McCain, who relishes the media spotlight probably more than any politician in America, downplayed his White House lust after the agreement was reached, disingenuously telling The Hill, a Washington political newspaper, "I wouldn't have come out against the nuclear option if my presidential ambitions were playing a role in this… I knew it would hurt me. I'm not dumb."
Also, despite McCain's coziness with certain Democrats in opposing certain Bush initiatives, the Senator campaigned tirelessly for Bush last yearmuch to Kerry's chagrinis pro-life and an unapologetic supporter of the President's foreign policy. McCain has also mended fences with Bush's strategist Karl Rove, the one man who'll have the most under-the-radar influence in GOP grass-root voter drives, procurement of endorsements and fundraising. McCain is certainly not Bush or Rove's first choice for a successor, but they're practical men who desire above all a continuation of Republican power in Washington. If the prospective Democratic candidate is Clinton, does anyone really think that GOP power brokers will entrust the nomination to a religious extremist like Sam Brownback or the listless Bill Frist?
McCain all but declared his candidacy in a fawning profile of him by The New Yorker's Connie Bruck in the weekly's May 30 issue. Asked by the author if he was "well-suited" to lead the country talk about a softball question McCain responded that yes, with the country engaged in a terrorism war that shows no sign of abating, he has "the qualifications to address what is now the transcendent issue of our time." Former Sen. Bob Kerrey added, "He's got to be the one person the Democrats least want as [the nominee]. I'm a Democrat, of course but he causes people like me to think twice."
I don't care for McCain much his campaign finance reform charade, for example, was egregious but faced with the very real possibility of Hillary Clinton back in the White House, there's simply no contest.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor "Mugger" -- aka Russ Smith -- was the editor-in-chief and CEO of New York Press. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]