Jewish World Review May 20, 2005/ 11 Iyar
Dems have the country right where they want it to be
Democrats across the nation are cautiously optimistic these days, cheered by the perception that the Bush administration is floundering in Washington, unable to coerce the Republican-controlled Congress to rally behind the President and enact at least part of his ambitious legislative agenda before next year's midterm elections.
Supposedly, bad news is just followed by worse news for the White House.
Social Security reform, according to Bush's opponents, is an albatross that will doom Republicans in 2006. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, even if he's not indicted, is a broken man who may not win reelection in his home Texan district. Violence has escalated once again in Iraq, proving that what is commonly called "Bush's war" is morally bankrupt and sure to intensify the rest of the world's disdain for the United States. Bush's nominee for ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, may or may not be confirmed by the Senate because he's an arrogant bully who can't get along with subordinates, much less Kofi Annan. Polls show that Bush has the worst approval ratings for a second-term president in memory. Finally, Democratic leaders are convinced that Americans will rebel against the GOP's upcoming attempt to kill the filibuster on judicial choices.
Even William Kristol, editor of the conservative, generally pro-Bush Weekly Standard, lectured the administration in his May 23 issue that the President is in a funk, one that can only be remedied by a vigorous fight in the Senate, day after day, on the merits of Bolton's nomination. Kristol also claims Social Security is DOA, and he suggests forestalling the filibuster fight and getting right to Bolton, believing that senators like Norm Coleman (Annan's cross to bear), John McCain and presidential hopeful George Allen will shred the vacuous and vicious charges against a man who's been confirmed by the Senate for other government positions. Kristol says: "[A debate on Bolton] will prove a valuable tonic for a White House and a Republican Congress that needs a pick-me-up and it will produce a result that will be good for the country."
I doubt partisan Democrats will agree with Kristol's closing civics lesson there's no Bush victory they consider a "good" result for the country but they're probably delighted by his nervous tone.
Kristol's one of the preeminent conservative intellectuals in Washington and citizens ought to be forever grateful in his pivotal role in scuttling Hillary Clinton's economy-busting health care charade over a decade ago. Still, as he's wont to do quarterly, Kristol's close to pushing the panic button.
There are two enormous advantages that Bush has over the Democrats in the coming six months, and they're not often discussed by a media that's caught up in the battles of day. One, all this controversy (real or ginned-up) is happening in an off-election year and 18 months from now most of the current tugs-of-war will be resolved one way or the other. As usually happens, both sides will claim victory and then go campaign for their party or individual seats.
Two, if there's a charismatic Democrat who can articulate the party's position to Americans at large, he or she is taking a long vacation. You can argue with the details of Bush's dogged determination to tackle the looming Social Security crisisa thorny issue that held no immediate political gain for himbut a decade from now he'll be remembered as a president who had the guts to present the problem the permanent government in D.C. that wants to pretend doesn't exist.
Reid (along with his tongue-tied counterpart in the House, Nancy Pelosi) is unlikely to lead his party to electoral success. On May 6, speaking to a high school civics class in Las Vegas, the Nevadan called Bush "a loser" who's "driving this country into bankruptcy." Just hours later, Reid called Bush's strategist Karl Rove to apologize for his language. Several days later, however, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Reid told reporters he wasn't backing down from his comments, reiterating that the administration has "done a very, very bad job for this nation and the world."
Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean, also forgetting that Bush is personally popular, said at a Massachusetts convention that Tom DeLay "ought to go back to Houston where he can serve his jail sentence," ignoring the inconvenient fact that the Majority Leader hasn't been charged with a crime.
The 2008 Democratic presidential nomination has nearly been ceded to Hillary Clinton although sad sack John Kerry is trying to muster enthusiasm for another run so wouldn't it make sense for the New York senator to abandon her reelection plans for next year and campaign fulltime for Democrats in the midterms? This would elevate Clinton to de facto national leader of the party, and give her the freedom (accompanied by an eager media, both liberal and conservative) to visit every exurb, church, farm and city in the country, making the case for political change.
If you're a Democrat, whom would you rather see at campaign rallies, parrying against Bush next year, Harry Reid or Clinton?
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor "Mugger" -- aka Russ Smith -- was the editor-in-chief and CEO of New York Press. Send your comments to him by clicking here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]