|
|
|
Jewish World Review Oct. 24, 2000 / 25 Tishrei, 5761
Chris Matthews
It wasn't 1960, the date of their historic "Great Debate,"
but 13 years earlier. The U.S. congressman from
McKeesport, Pa., had picked the best Democratic and
Republican prospects from the class of '46 to come and
show their stuff before a downtown civic group.
"He won that one," JFK laughed during a presidential
re-visit to McKeesport in 1962, "and then we went on to
other things."
This is an example of how wide the gap is between the
Bush-Gore rivalry of 2000 and the very personal rivalry
of JFK and Nixon four decades ago to which it is so
often compared.
The fact is, Kennedy and Nixon knew each other quite
well before going head to head.
The two Navy officers from World War II had come to
Congress together the same year and served on the same
committee: Education and Labor. Both became
committed Cold Warriors. Groomed in wildly different
worlds, they formed one of those odd Capitol Hill
friendships that would make their later contest for the
presidency all the more bitter.
"I was always convinced that you would move ahead to the top," Jack wrote
Nixon after his '52 nomination for vice president, "but I never thought it would
come this quickly."
"While the hand of fate made Jack and me political opponents," Nixon wrote
Jack's widow that sad November night 11 years later, "I always cherished the
fact that we were personal friends from the time we came to Congress together
in 1947."
Historians will never dig up such notes between Al Gore and George Bush.
No. Theirs is a combat between strangers, men who share neither a common
personal history nor a similar professional path, only a mutual contempt for
everything the other man stands for.
"I have not spent the last quarter century in pursuit of personal wealth," Gore
said in Wednesday's final debate after reviewing his own resume of perennial
public service.
Bush, who takes obvious pride in his past exploits as oil man and baseball team
owner, holds to an equally dim view of Gore's career. Why would anyone
spend his adulthood pandering to the Democratic Party's myriad of pressure
groups?
Their differing careers obviously reflect a deep divide in their attitudes. Gore
told us Wednesday night that public service is the most noble of all possible
vocations. That includes public school teachers. "Most schools," he assured us,
"are excellent."
Bush offered a far different manifesto. "I don't trust the federal government," he
told the country.
Gore says "we" in speaking of the federal government. When his topic is
better-off taxpayers, he is not referring to himself.
Bush, who says "Washington" when he is on the attack against big government,
is clearly on defense when the talk shifts to the prime targets of Gore tax
doctrine.
Unlike Kennedy and Nixon, who spent 13 years bumping into each other in
Capitol hallways, this pair has shared but a handful of hours confronting each
other in primetime. They eye each other, not with the mixed respect of
veterans, but as symbols of what each detests. After three nights of debate,
their only shared experience is playing the other guy's villain.
This may explain why we've found this Bush-Gore contest so bloodless, their
three-act drama so vacant. Imagine how good these debates might have been if
the governor and the vice president had been old pals — even shared a sleeper
way back
when?
10/17/00: Play White House admissions officer
|