Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 31, 2000 /27 Shevat, 5760

Chris Matthews

Matthews
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
David Corn
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports
Newswatch
Weekly Standard

Econophone

Trakdata


Which GOPer is willing to pay for his positions?


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- HANOVER, N.H. -- They are four characters in search of a presidency. The same in their ambition, Bush, Gore, McCain and Bradley are far different in their White House agendas.

The issue that will engage them all, however, is that of a woman's right to an abortion.

George W. Bush, 53, is Shakespeare's Prince Hal. He has abandoned a wild youth for a seasoned adulthood. Where once he heard the chimes at midnight, he now hears the call of his father's throne.

There are weaknesses in such late-blooming. Having spent so many years taking the challenges of life as they came, he developed no taste for serious speculation. A youth and young adulthood spent at the fun-loving Falstaff's side may have ill-prepared him to debate abortion rights with Albert Gore.

"Should the 14th Amendment's protections apply to the unborn child," CNN's Wolf Blitzer asks him. "Well, I'm not very familiar with what that part of the platform's all about," Bush answers. "Maybe you can help me understand."

John McCain, quick with judgment on grand matters of peace and war, pleads for a break when it comes to abortion rights.

"I think there's huge problems associated with this entire issue because it's based on moral beliefs," he told me last week. "I'm trying to find a way through it, preserving my fundamental beliefs, and I think that a dialogue is very important."

The big question, starting in tomorrow's first-in-the-nation primary here, is who will pay the bigger price for his uneasy position. Gov. Bush, who was pushed rightward in Iowa on the abortion issue by the taunts of Steve Forbes, Alan Keyes and Gary Bauer. Or John McCain, who must rely on abortion moderates and pro-choicers to beat Bush in the early Republican primaries?

The probable answer is that both men will be hurt by their uneasy abortion stands. Bush might well win the GOP nomination tilting starboard on the issue but suffer fatal defections by pro-choice Republican women in November.

McCain, trying to be a conciliator on the polarizing question, may so alienate the party's pro-life majority that he never gets that far.

On the Democratic side, there's a pronounced comfort with the abortion rights position.

Al Gore, 51, speaks of "a woman's right to choose" as if he were saying "it's great to be here." His frequent recitation of this mantra is practice for the general election. He seems intent on making George Bush's anti-abortion stance the same kind of weapon he made of Bill Bradley's stance on Medicaid.

Bradley, for his part, continues to speak on such issues from such a distant, Olympian height that many Democratic primary voters have yet to hear him.

Watching the intramural battles in both parties, meanwhile, it's hard to ignore the noise of a coming, all-out battle over abortion rights, with the Democratic candidate insisting on them, the Republican candidate trying with all his strength to change the subject.



JWR contributor Chris Matthews is the author of Hardball. and hosts a CNBC show of the same name. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up

01/27/00: John McCain's gay radar
01/25/00: This time, candidates get 'authenticity' check
01/18/00: AIDS dooms 1 in 4 in tiny Swaziland
01/13/00: Complacency might be the campaign key
01/10/00: A choice, not an echo
01/06/00: The role of a lifetime
01/03/00: Dangers in Gore's dirty war
12/30/99: Churchill's fighting words saved the century
12/28/99: Candidate Gore's separation anxiety
12/17/99: Catch 22: Leading candidates don't lead
12/17/99: New Democratic leader on the horizon
12/15/99: Is Hillary clueless?
12/08/99: Taking Buchananism to the streets
12/03/99: Why are we so obsessed with 'spin'?
12/01/99: Donald Trump, 'Sinatra of Steel'
11/29/99: Why AlGore will be our next president
11/23/99: After the fall
11/17/99: Our conveniently forgetful president
11/15/99: Next president: Male, WASP, self-selected
11/10/99: Backroom Bill
11/08/99: Please don't feed the 'pander bears'
11/03/99: Battle of the Bubba clones
11/01/99: Pat Buchanan, kamikaze candidate
10/27/99: The year of the woman... voter
10/25/99: The Curse of the Bubba
10/21/99: GOP gives Clinton his finest hour
10/18/99: Clinton's last hurrah
10/13/99: Rough seas for Capt. Ventura
10/11/99: Gore targets Bradley's strength
10/06/99: Bradley's got the right Rx
10/04/99: Buchanan, Churchill and Hitler
09/30/99: Who'll spin political gold in Golden State Gore or Bradley?
09/27/99: Here's a millennial checklist for candidates
09/22/99: The biography battle
09/20/99: Buchanan's new book is a must-read
09/15/99: Don't rule out Beatty
09/13/99: The man with the sun on his face
09/08/99: W. vs. Jr. on dope and the draft
The FALN: Hillary's Willie Horton
08/26/99: Bill's guilt fuels Hill's race
08/25/99: The seemingly inexhaustible strength of America's free enterprise
08/23/99: GOP candidates are weak also-rans
08/16/99: Bubba on Bubba
08/11/99: Hillary's agonizing attempts to understand
08/09/99: With warm regards, Richard Nixon
08/04/99: Weicker: real third party is on the Left
08/02/99: Dubyah's last hangover
07/27/99: Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh; capitalism is gonna win

© 2000, NEA