Jewish World Review June 10, 2003 / 10 Sivan 5763

Paul Greenberg

Paul Greenberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Media myths and how they're made, or: Maureen the magician

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Howell Raines isn't the only one who's had some explaining to do at the once good, once gray New York Times. Brother Raines finally stepped down as executive editor last week, and nothing became his brief but disastrous tenure more than his ending it.

But for a casebook example of how journalism came to be considered one of the black arts, consider someone who's still at The Times -- star columnist Maureen Dowd. She's just shown how to use a few little dots the way a magician does his silk handkerchief: to create an illusion.

Maureen the Magnificent needed only an ellipsis to pull off her trick and, hesto presto, the simple meaning of a presidential comment was changed. It's done like so, to quote her column of May 14:

"Busy chasing off Saddam, the president and vice president had told us that al-Qaida was spent. 'Al-Qaida is on the run,' the president said last week. 'That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly, but surely, being decimated. . They're not a problem anymore.'"

Here is what the president actually said in Little Rock, Ark., on May 5, with the missing words in italics:

"Al-Qaida is on the run. That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly, but surely, being decimated. Right now, about half of all the top Al-Qaida operatives are either jailed or dead. In either case, they're not a problem any more."

Makes quite a difference, doesn't it? The president was clearly referring to those terrorists jailed or dead not being a problem anymore -- not the whole, murderous outfit. Q.E.D.

But who reads texts? It was Maureen Dowd's incomplete, foreshortened, distorted quotation that took wings, and has been repeated by now on MSNBC (by Bill Press), CNN (by Miles O'Brien), ABC (by Dan Harris), The Nation (of course) and various others, including foreign outlets that love to bash this president almost as much as his domestic critics do. Even if they have to edit out some of his words to do it. (As if this president didn't commit enough linguistic gaffes unaided. We haven't had a president with his mysterious way with words since Eisenhower.)

As it turns out, the sardonic "they're not a problem anymore" construction is one of W.'s favorites. He uses it every chance he gets. It's probably the wry combination of understatement and closure in the punch line ("not a problem anymore") that appeals to the Texican in him. It sounds like a line Clint Eastwood might utter in one of his Lone Star epics. You can almost see our cowboy president blowing the smoke away from his six-shooter afterward.

There's never been any mystery about which terrorists he was referring to -- those in the hoosegow or No Longer With Us.

So why would a columnist in Maureen Dowd's stellar position resort to so obvious and unconvincing a trick?

I'd like to think it was just fatigue. It was another hurried and harried day in the newspaper business, the lady had a column to write, and, what th' heck, it'd be in the paper for a day, then forgotten, and that would be that. Nobody would notice. But somebody did.

But even if nobody had, wouldn't the writer know? It's called loading-dock tension in the trade -- the knowledge that the proof of your mistake is just waiting out there to be delivered, to be circulated to hundreds of thousands in unrecallable black-and-white. I know the feeling, and hate it. But it usually drives me to bang out a correction even before the presses have stopped running. (I value my sleep).

Why has Maureen Dowd remained Above It All? Does she think working for The New York Times confers some kind of immunity from the rules the rest of us go by? But these days The Times is an example to beware, not emulate. In only a few short months, it's given teachers of ethics courses at J-Schools years of material.

Maureen Dowd's little distortion will cling to both her and the president whose words she'd twisted. Particularly if she never takes responsibility for it. She really ought to. For at least a couple of reasons:

First, because she's been found out.

Second, she'd sleep better.

Or as Cosmo Castorini tells his daughter at the end of one of my favorite films, "Moonstruck": "Tell him the truth, Loretta, they find out anyway." Mr. Castorini, as I recall, was a plumber; he should have been a journalism instructor.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Paul Greenberg, editorial page editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, has won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing. He coined the moniker "Slick Willy." Send your comments by clicking here.

Paul Greenberg Archives


Up

© 2002, TMS