Jewish World Review April 26, 2006 / 28 Nissan, 5766

Paul Greenberg

Paul Greenberg
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

I get letters . . . | The letters from readers keep coming. All kinds from all over. Snail mail has given way to e-mail over the years, but the substance of the letters themselves remains basically unchanged:

Most deal with politics, as one might expect in response to a columnist who writes mostly about politics. My valued correspondents agree with me, they disagree with me, or they may do both in part. All are welcome; the cheers lift the spirits and the boos can teach.

Indeed, we learn most from our critics. What was it Confucius said of one of his followers? "My disciple Hui is of no help to me. In my words there is nothing which he does not admire."

The criticisms that hurt aren't those that don't make much sense, but those that make all too much. After the initial defensiveness passes, instruction sets in.

As for the blusterers, the snobs, the bores-in-general . . . it's wholly a pleasure to hear from them. I save their missives (or should that be missiles?) like a miser hoarding treasures. If I didn't have them to use as a ploy, how else would I fill up a column on a slow news day? They're the salvation of the lazy columnist.

Other kinds of correspondents tend to be less useful. Like those who have this great idea and just need somebody to write it up. They remind me of me when I'm suggesting an idea to John Deering, our talented cartoonist here at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. ("Here's a great idea — all you have to do is draw it!") As if the way an idea is presented isn't the essence of it.

Then there are the nameless bushwhackers who want me to criticize others without using their names. Brave people.

Others believe their ideas would get more attention if presented by your obdt. servant. Much like Mark Twain telling his old friend William Dean Howells that he'd written an outrageous letter to someone and signed Howells' name to it — just to give it more weight.

And the loonies we will always have with us. I think of them as the Death Ray people. I can still remember the first time someone shared that delusion with me — on the steps of the University of Missouri library. She was a nice, elderly lady who had waylaid a few of us students to talk about how They were directing lethal rays at her, her house, her car . . . . What was scariest about her was the dead-even voice in which she related all this hysterical stuff.

We backed away gingerly, thinking the whole episode exceeding strange. Only later would I discover that the Death Ray syndrome is a quite common form of paranoia. As my correspondence demonstrates to this day. ("Am I an experiment here? . . . Who are these people terrorizing me day and night? Why? What kind of chemicals have they been spraying in my house, garage, car?") You're torn between pity and, well, just pity. It can't be easy to live like that.

Here's a clue that might be of some help to the psychiatrists: I never receive an e-mail complaining about death rays; they always come the old-fashioned way — via the U.S. Mail. I'm not sure what that says about the relation between psychosis and technology; maybe the professionals can explain it.

Then there are the people with real troubles, the kind that require more help than a columnist can give. The young girl who's retarded and is taunted at school. The disfigured, the seriously ill, the terminally lonely . . . .

They bring to mind the kind of letters Nathaniel West's character in "Miss Lonelyhearts" had to answer when he signed on as an advice columnist, aka sob sister.

The job was supposed to be a lark, but the poor guy winds up taking it so seriously it kills him. Even today, reading some of the letters that came to Miss Lonelyhearts can tear you apart. The novel was published in 1933 but remains all too timely.

Happily, just when you think you're about to lose it, there are the kinds of letters that pull you back from the edge — letters from old friends you haven't heard from in years, or, even better, old enemies you can scarcely remember. (Gosh, was I mad at him or was he mad at me? It's been so long ago . . . .)

Then there are the readers, bless 'em, who tell you, yes, yes, yes, that's just the reaction they had, too. And those who help you understand something you never would have understood without their help. They restore balance.

It all comes with the territory. You sign on for it when you take the job. And what a grand job it is. Imagine getting paid just to express your opinions. Listening to others is a small price to pay for the privilege. Who knows, maybe that's why we're all here: to listen to one another.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Paul Greenberg, editorial page editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, has won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing. Send your comments by clicking here.

Paul Greenberg Archives


© 2005, TMS