Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review March 23, 2001/ 28 Adar, 5761

Suzanne Fields

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
James Glassman
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

When speech isn't free -- PITY the students at Brown University. They're caught in a crossfire between students who steal student newspapers that print things they don't like and students who demand the right to read and decide for themselves.

What ignited the civil war was an advertisement in the Brown Daily Herald that set out 10 reasons against reparations to black Americans for the slavery of their ancestors. JWR columnist David Horowitz, a onetime '60s radical who's a conservative now and who edits Heterodoxy, a magazine that often lampoons political correctness on campus, placed the ad and has become a moving target for the narrow-minded.

He knows how to make people mad.

This particular ad is in the honorable tradition of college debate, operating on the idea that the best way to get attention is to get somebody's goat. Mr. Horowitz makes his points in a punchy way, designed to stimulate spirited rebuttal. Not only does the ad state the obvious, that there's "no single group clearly responsible for the crime of slavery,'' but it goes for the goat by suggesting that "reparations have already been paid ... in the form of welfare benefits and racial preferences.''

These are fighting words for students who don't think that way, but who fail to see argument as an opportunity to show off an ability to make serious counter-arguments with verbal virtuosity and intellectual intensity.

Many students -- and their teachers, who ought to know better -- merely get their feelings hurt and demand silence from those who disagree with them. "This racist attack on black students sets a very dangerous precedent,'' Kenneth Knies, a teaching assistant in the Afro-America Studies Department, told the Brown Daily Herald. "I have talked to students who told me that they can't perform basic functions like walking or sleeping because of this ad.'' (Walking and chewing gum at the same time, as in Lyndon Johnson's famous putdown of Gerald Ford, would surely be out of the question.)

Nevertheless, a coalition of students against the ad, perhaps walking in their sleep, stole nearly 4,000 copies of the newspaper. They described their crime as "a symbolic act of civil disobedience.'' But this was civil disobedience in the sandbox, of a sort that Martin Luther King, who invited arrest, would never have recognized.

If seriously into civil disobedience, the students would have chained themselves to the newspaper boxes, willing to suffer the consequences. Instead, they hid behind excuses: "We didn't really do anything wrong, because you can't steal a paper that's given away free.'' Say what?

One outraged defender of speech wrote a letter to the editor of the Daily Herald: "Martin Luther King didn't write 'Letter from a Birmingham Starbucks.''' Other letter writers called the protesters "spineless wussies'' and "elitist self-centered poseurs.''

But if David Horowitz is not exactly the Mario Savio of the right, spearheading a Free Speech Movement for the new millennium, he has exposed the hang-tough editors of college newspapers, as hanging tough is defined in modern academia, as cowardly lions of capitulation. Editors at Harvard, Columbia and the University of Virginia refused to run the ad, and the editor of the Daily Californian at Berkeley offered an abject apology to his readers for running it. These kids, alas, are our journalists for tomorrow.

But so, too, is Julie Bosman, the editor of the University of Wisconsin Badger Herald in Madison, who not only ran the ad, but boldly defended her position in her newspaper and on the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. She stands out in sharp contrast to the breed of editors at elite colleges who respond to criticism with cowering repentance.

The saddest example of this cowardice under fire is at the Harvard Crimson, which published not one but two apologies for printing a satirical column teasing Asian students for acting like a "swarm of clones.'' The offending author was a student editor who mocks himself "as a self-hating Asian,'' but if his irony was over the line, the Crimson editors' self-abasement, scolding themselves as "insensitive,'' was over the top.

"All successful newspapers,'' said H.L. Mencken, "are ceaselessly querulous and bellicose.'' Well, that was a long time ago in a land far away, when the best campus newspapermen/women were encouraged to live on the cutting edge of controversy and intellectual dissent. Today it takes an old fogy like David Horowitz, moving from left to right, to teach that lesson to unwilling pupils.


03/19/01: Russell Crowe doesn't wear a Black Beret
03/15/01: 'The little intimidator' of the breakfast table
03/13/01: "We are asking the Creator for clemency"
03/08/01: Saving El Salvador with dollars and sense
02/27/01: The last cowboys of their craft
02/23/01: When Bubba graduates to Bobo
02/16/01: Clarence Thomas addresses an imperfect world
02/12/01: Ariel Sharon, not by Steven Spielberg
02/07/01: Profaning the sacred with the political
02/05/01: What's the Creator got to do with it?
02/01/01: Live like the snopses, leave like the snopses
01/29/01: It's education, stupid
01/25/01: "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows"
01/22/01: Poetry and religion in the Bush administration
01/18/01: Ashcroft can't dance (don't ask him)
01/15/01: Clothes make the First Lady
01/11/01: Pity Jerusalem in the 'peace' process
01/08/01: Laying the political race card
01/04/01: 'What women want' in the new millennium
01/02/01: This year, looking ahead is sure sweeter than looking back
12/21/00: Black power with a Republican face
12/21/00: First impressions of two First Ladies
12/18/00: Challenge for the 'better angels of our nature'
12/14/00: What we've lost sight of
12/13/00: Hillary in the lion's den
12/08/00: Return of the 'second sex' on campus
12/04/00: Politics as entertainment today
11/30/00: Winner vs. whiner
11/27/00: Measuring against history
11/23/00: Memories of Thanksgiving past
11/17/00: In defense of the Electoral College
11/16/00: More than one way to win an election
11/13/00: Sexual politics squared
11/09/00: A Middle East legacy
11/06/00: Filling in the dots at campaign's end
11/02/00: His own man in full
10/30/00: The Oval Office, through a glass brightly
10/23/00: There'll always be an England. Maybe.
10/19/00: The celebrity candidate
10/16/00: 'Ladies night' at the second debate
10/12/00: Gore vs. Bush: Volvo vs. Maserati
10/10/00: We weep for Rami for he is dead
10/05/00: Looking at Lieberman from inside the 'ghetto'
10/02/00: Campaigns, candidates, and kissy-face
09/28/00: Laughing and crying over Joe Lieberman
09/21/00: Targeting teenagers for money
09/21/00: Sexual politics in New York
09/18/00: Surviving the stereotypes and debates
09/14/00: Gloria Steinem runs cheerfully into captivity
09/12/00: Sex in the eye of the partisan
09/07/00: 'Sex and death' on the college campus
09/05/00: Joe Lieberman as a 'Menorah Man'
08/31/00: Rising suns of the conventions
08/17/00: Changing icons: From Loretta Young to Hillary Clinton
08/14/00: The Creator returns to the public square
08/10/00: Bursting with pride, but caution too
08/07/00: Brains, beauty and beastly politics
08/03/00: A candidate with a superego
07/31/00: The sizzling Lynne Cheney
07/27/00: The party of the aging Playboys
07/24/00 Hillary drives the Jewish wagon into a ditch
07/20/00 Conservatives gone fishin'
07/17/00: Snoop Doggy Dogg was a founding father, wasn't he?
07/13/00: When a teenager doesn't need a prime minister
07/10/00: Abortion as cruel and unusual punishment
07/06/00: Surviving 'survivor' TV
07/03/00: Independence Day with Norman Rockwell
06/29/00: Here comes 'something old'
06/26/00: Waiting too long for the baby
06/22/00: Good teachers, curious students and oxymorons
06/19/00: Wanted: Some ants for Gore's pants
06/15/00: Like father, like daughter
06/12/00: Culture wars and conservative warriors
06/08/00: Return of the housewife
06/05/00: Hillary and Al -- playing against type
05/31/00: The sexual revolution confronts the SUV
05/25/00: Waiting for the movie
05/22/00: Pistol packin' mamas
05/18/00: Journalists and the 'new time' religion
05/15/00: There's nothing like a (military) dame
05/11/00: 'The Human Stain' on campus
05/09/00: We've come a long way, Betty Friedan
05/04/00: From George Washington to Mansa Masu
05/01/00: Gore's ruthless doublespeak
04/28/00: Doing it Castro's way
04/24/00: Women's studies beget narrow minds
04/17/00: The slippery slope of anti-Semitism
04/13/00: A villain larger than life
04/10/00: When mourning becomes an economic tragedy
04/03/00: The last permissible bigotry
03/30/00: Seeking the political Oscar
03/23/00: The gaying of America
03/20/00: Pointy-eared quadrupeds on campus
03/16/00: The shocking art of the establishment
03/13/00: Sawdust on the campaign trail
03/10/00: Campaign rhetoric of manhood
03/06/00: The Amphetamine of the People
03/02/00: Elegy for Amadou
02/29/00: With only a million, what's a poor girl to do?
02/24/00: The changing politics of change
02/16/00: Tip from Hillary: 'Let 'em eat eggs'
02/10/00: No seances with Eleanor
02/07/00: Campaigning like our founding fathers
02/03/00: When neo-Nazis have short memories
01/31/00: George W. -- 'Ladies man' and 'man's man'
01/27/00: Dead white males and live white politicians
01/25/00: Smarting over presidential smarts
01/21/00: A post-modern song for `The Sopranos'
01/19/00: When personality is a long-distance plus
01/13/00: French lessons in amour --- and marriage
01/10/00: Reaching for the Big Golden Apple
01/07/00: Liddy Dole as the face of feminism
01/04/00: Hillary: From victim to victor
12/30/99: 'Dream catchers' for the millennium
12/27/99: In search of a candidate with strength and eloquence
12/21/99: The president as First Lady
12/16/99: Columbine with blurred hindsight
12/09/99: Homeless deserve discriminating attention
12/07/99: Casual censors and deadly know-nothings
12/02/99: Why mom didn't make general: A reality tale
11/30/99: Potholes on the road to the Promised Land
11/25/99: A feast for the spirit and the stomach
11/23/99: Fathers need to say 'I (can) do'
11/18/99: Adventures of a conservative pundit
11/15/99: Traveling with Jefferson on the information highway
11/11/99: Wanted: 'Foliage of forbiddinness' for the oval office
11/09/99: Eggs, art and rotten commerce
11/05/99: Al Gore, 'Alpha Male'. Bow wow.
11/01/99: Gay love
10/28/99: Lose one Dole, lose two
10/26/99: Rebels with a violent cause
10/21/99: Reforming parents, reforming schools
10/19/99: The male mystique -- he shops
10/13/99:The campaign of the Teletubbies
10/08/99: Money is in the eye of the art dealer
10/01/99: Lincoln's 'Almost Chosen People'
09/29/99: Introducing Bill and Hillary Bickerson
09/27/99: Must we wait for the next massacre?
09/24/99: Miss America meets Miss'd America
09/21/99: Princeton's 'professor death'
09/16/99: The Cisneros lesson
09/13/99: No clemency for personal politics
09/08/99: M-M-M is for manhood
08/30/99: Blocking the schoolhouse door
08/27/99: No kick from cocaine
08/23/99: Movies don't kill people
08/19/99: A rude awakening
08/16/99: Dubyah and that 'language' thing
08/09/99: Chauvinist sows -- oink oink

©1999, Suzanne Fields. Distributed by Los Angeles Times Syndicate