Jewish World Review

Robert W. Tracinski

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The Bait-and-Switch Philosophy at the Collectivist Convention | What does America stand for? What are its founding ideas? In this contentious election, each side is trying to convince us that its policies and ideals are the answer to this question.

The Democrats have traditionally relies on a simple technique: appeal to the values of American individualism, while actually selling the American people the virtues of the all-powerful collective.

That is the theme that emerges from the first three nights of speeches at the Democratic convention. Note the pattern of this bait-and-switch philosophy.

Teresa Heinz Kerry says that "Americans believed that they could know all there is to know, build all there is to build, break down any barrier, tear down any wall.... Americans showed the world what can happen when people believe in amazing possibilities. And, that, for me, is the spirit of America."

Freedom, self-confidence, a contempt for barriers and limits — that certainly is essential to the American character. But who, in Heinz Kerry's view, best epitomizes these virtues? The inventor who develops a new product? The entrepreneur who pioneers a new industry? The hard-working businessmen who, in actual fact, "build all there is to build"? No. "To me, one of the best faces America has ever projected is the face of a Peace Corps volunteer.... Those young people convey an idea of America that is all about heart and creativity, generosity and confidence, a practical, can-do sense and a big, big smile."

Donate to JWR

This is an attempts to connect the American character to self-effacing self-sacrifice. It's OK to be creative, confident, and have a "can-do" manner — so long as you devote yourself to digging irrigation ditches in the Third World. But dare to pursue your own goals and seek to improve your own life and you are no longer part of the American dream.

This contrast is most striking in Tuesday's keynote speech by Barack Obama, who borrows some of his eloquence from Thomas Jefferson: "Our pride is based on a very simple premise, summed up in a declaration made over two hundred years ago: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.' That is the true genius of America."

But Obama goes too far — and gives the whole game away. What does it mean to believe that individuals have the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"? It means that each individual has to right to be free from government interference — and free to pursue his own happiness and well-being.

The Founders held an implicit ethics of rational self-interest. It was not the alleged self-interest of a brute who lives by plundering his fellow man, but "self-interest properly understood" — to use the phrase popular at the time — which means a system of liberty, property rights, the rule of law, and limited government.

But Obama brushes all of this aside when he gives his recommendation of John Kerry: "Our Party has chosen a man to lead us who embodies the best this country has to offer.... John Kerry understands the ideals of community, faith, and service." How did we get from "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" to "community, faith, and service"? Obama provides no answer — but it is clear, by the end of the speech, which side of that contradiction is winning in his mind:

"Alongside our famous individualism, there's another ingredient in the American saga. A belief that we're all connected as one people.... It is that fundamental belief — I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper — that makes this country work…. E pluribus unum. Out of many, one."

The man who made this technique most explicit was Ted Kennedy. Speaking Tuesday night, he freely invoked Boston's Revolutionary War heritage. But what, in his view, is that heritage? "Ideals like freedom and equality and opportunity and fairness and common decency for all — ideals that all Americans yearn to reclaim."

"Equality" had a specific meaning to the Founders: equality of rights. It meant that no class of aristocrats possessed special rights at the expense of other citizens. They never endorsed egalitarianism. But you wouldn't know that by listening to Ted Kennedy. Indeed, he cites, as the noblest period in America's history, the Democrats' crusade for the welfare state. "Time and again in America's history, we as Democrats have offered new hope — of a stronger, fairer, more prosperous future for all our people — a society that feeds the hungry, shelters the homeless, and cares for the sick — so that none must walk alone."

The Democrats have been told that they must not seem "anti-American" in time of war; that they have to try to capture the patriotic American "heartland"; that they have to be "optimistic" and "Reagan-esque." And so they tried to appeal to American values and ideals — all of which are implicitly based on individualism. But they have to harness those value to their collectivist agenda. Hence the following grotesque paragraph, from a crucial passage in Kennedy's speech:

"It was no accident that Massachusetts was founded as a commonwealth, a place where authority belongs not to a single ruler, but to the people themselves, joined together for the common good. The old system was based on inequality.... The colonists knew they could do better, just as we know we can do better today — but only if we all work together, only if we all reach out together, only if we all come together for the common good.... America is a compact, a bargain, a contract. It says that all of us are connected. Our fates are intertwined.... Our Constitution binds us together."

In fact, the Constitution exists to protect our rights and to limit the power of government. But Kennedy believes it exists to "bind us together" to collect our "common wealth" for the "common good." This is not an appeal to American values, but a total inversion of them.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

JWR contributor Robert Tracinski is the editor and publisher of TIA Daily and the Intellectual Activist. Click here to visit his website. Comment by clicking here.

07/30/04: The Bait-and-Switch Philosophy at the Collectivist Convention
07/28/04: 34 months vs. 444 days: There Jimmy Carter goes again, blaming America for his failures
06/18/03: The Hazards of a Smoke-Free Environment
05/15/03: The road to victory goes through Tehran
03/19/03: Don't defy the UN --- end it
03/06/03: The withering Blix-krieg
02/27/03: Dictatorship by the numbers
02/20/03: The worldwide epidemic of doctors' strikes
02/13/03: Bad economics in one lesson
02/06/03: Defending America's second front
01/29/03: The self-made state of the states
01/23/03: The Iraq charade
01/17/03: Atlas Shrugs in Venezuela
01/03/03: Goodbye to Gehry's bad joke
12/19/02: The Dems' sorry lot
12/11/02: Venezuela's lonely rebellion
12/05/02: Red-tape conservationists
11/27/02: The craven appeasement of Islam by the West
11/20/02: The real revolutionaries
11/14/02: President must still release himself from political trap
11/06/02: The election we deserve
10/31/02: The rush from judgment
10/23/02: The grand illusion
10/17/02: Loose lips in the pressroom
10/10/02: Permission to speak
10/03/02: The bear market makes the case for privatizing social security
09/27/02: Enron vs. Atlas Shrugged
09/19/02: Bush loses the war, again
09/11/02: What have we lost?
09/05/02: The case for "destabilization"
08/29/02: "Sustainable" development's unsustainable contradictions
08/22/02: The photographing of public art and architecture has apparently been deemed a threat to the Republic
08/14/02: Talk vs. ideas
08/12/02: Blood for oil
08/06/02: The welfare debate we're not having
07/30/02: Newsflash: Hauling CEOs away in manacles makes market soar!
07/23/02: Clearing the way for real airport security
07/16/02: The war on CEOs
07/09/02: Small-time crooks
06/27/02: Martha and the tall poppies
06/21/02: The post-colonialist famine
06/12/02: America's Maginot Line
06/07/02: Time's up for Pakistan
05/28/02: Freedom's defenders
05/22/02: What they knew and when they knew it
05/16/02: The mixed-economy monster
05/08/02: Conference in Cloud Cuckoo Land
04/25/02: The 'Palestinian" victims?
04/18/02: Why Israel must not withdraw
04/09/02: LIVE FROM RAMALLAH: The Theater of the Absurd
03/26/02: Campaign finance corruption
03/21/02: Who is George Bush?
03/14/02: The prophets of defeatism
02/21/02: The war on terrorism and the war on reality
02/14/02: Multilateralism's one-way street
02/05/02: The Powell Problem
01/29/02: A profligate and irresponsible distortion of congressional priorities
01/22/02: Liberal conspiracy theories
01/15/02: Fading shock and fading resolve
01/08/02: Argentina's intellectual collapse
12/31/02: The real person of the year
12/26/01: With friends like us ...
12/19/01: Ending the "peace process war"
12/11/01: The ruthless grip of logic
12/04/01: War powers without war
11/27/01: An Afghanistan Thanksgiving
11/20/01: The end of the beginning
11/06/01: The phony war
10/30/01: A war against Islam
10/23/01: The economics of war
10/16/01: A culture of death
10/11/01: An empire of ideals
10/01/01: Why they hate us
09/24/01: The lessons of war
09/20/01: What a real war looks like
09/17/01: America's war song
09/12/01: It is worse than Pearl Harbor
09/11/01: Out of the fire and back into the frying pan
09/05/01: The UN Conference of Racists
08/28/01: Waging war on profits and lives
08/20/01: The Bizarro-World War
08/08/01: The death toll of environmentalism
07/31/01: Where does America stand?
07/25/01: Barbarians at the G8
07/17/01: The carrot and the carrot
07/11/01: The real Brave New World
07/03/01: The child-manipulators
06/19/01: The scientist trap
06/11/01: The National Academy of Dubious Science

© 2004