|
|
|
|
Jewish World Review March 15, 2005 / 4 Adar II 5765
Jay D. Homnick
The name of the game
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
Alger Hiss came to mind when I read a recent op-ed by Flynt Leverett in The New York Times. Which is not to say that Leverett is a pinko; if he has
any color at all, it is yellow.
Flynt is identified in the blurb as the former senior director for Middle
Eastern affairs at the National Security Council and currently a senior
fellow at Brookings Institution's center for Middle East policy. The
adjectival recurrence of "senior" should tell you all that you need to know.
Well, almost all: the rest is in the next sentence. It says that his
forthcoming book is entitled "Inheriting Syria: Bashar's Trial By Fire".
Why do I get the feeling from the title that Bashar Assad will break out a
magnum of champagne to greet this opus?
His essay in the Times begins with sophistry, segues into duplicity and
climaxes in perfidy. After mentioning that the Administration has taken a
stand and called upon Syria to restore Lebanon from suzerainty back to
sovereignty, he offers this staggering paragraph:
Administration hawks like Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (who, as
President Reagan's Middle East envoy, oversaw the collapse of America's
foray into Lebanon's civil war) and the National Security Council's Elliott
Abrams (whose previous involvement in Lebanon policy helped generate the
Iran-contra scandal) believe that such a course would allow the
establishment of a pro-Western government in Beirut that would accommodate
Israel and help to project American influence. They also believe that it
would set the stage for the Syrian regime's collapse, removing another
Baathist "rogue state."
First of all, Rumsfeld was the Middle East envoy for one quick trip after
the retirement of Philip Habib, and he famously returned and said he wanted
no part of that mess. Secondly, Abrams was trying to encourage Iran to
pressure their Lebanese client, Hezbollah, to release American hostages.
That is hardly a reflection on his grasp of broader geopolitical directions
in Lebanon policy. Thirdly, most importantly, nobody is quoted here saying
that it would set the stage for the Syrian regime's collapse because
nobody has indicated any such thing. Leverett is employing a despicable
tactic in feathering an unstated "belief" onto two policymakers whom he has
first succeeded in tarring.
He proceeds to warn against this "risky maximalist" course. Instead we
should take little baby steps. Shuffle the Syrian soldiers out, but slowly,
ever so slowly. Mustn't rile the stability. Have somewhat more open
elections in Lebanon, but timidly, ever so timidly. Press Syria to help
less the Iraqi insurgents, but gently, ever so gently. And if we really
want to send shock waves through the system, then he offers a "badly-needed
stick" with which to threaten Assad: Security Council action!!! Plus, he
hastens to add, we "should not be afraid to spell out for Mr. Assad the
carrots" that he can get for being a good boy.
Yep, it always seemed to me that the subtext of the battle of Whittaker
Chambers vs. Alger Hiss was the fact that both had those classic American
names. These were the cognomina of royalty in this country; they resonated
with the quality of the born leader, our equivalent of the coat-of-arms.
Some strange primordial guilt seemed to have overtaken them, convinced them
that the country they built had some incurable rot at its core. Chambers
and Hiss were hissing to each other in secret chambers to undermine the
foundations of this nation that they saw as desperately corrupt. Somehow
Chambers pulled out of this neurosis in time to stanch some of the flow of
lifeblood out of our polity.
But the title "Hiss-y" fits many such folks into our own day. We have not
trusted a President with a name like that since Lyndon Johnson; it has been
Dick and Gerry and Jimmy and Ronnie and George and Bill and George. When we
hear names like Strobe Talbott and Erskine Bowles and Flynt Leverett, they
are too often the captions under a droning voice of appeasement explaining
why George is biting off more pretzel than he can chew.
The fact is that Iraq is making startling progress to democracy, as the
Times Editorial page acknowledged the day before. Egypt agreed to hold an
election between two parties (although they first jailed the strongest
opponent). The Palestinians had a fairly fair election. Lebanese citizens
shouted down their quisling puppet government after the assassination of
Hariri. A kind of Berlin Wall momentum has built up, and we don't need
blue-bloods turning yellow. The Bush Administration has exercised perfect
timing and, yes, assertive timing in helping the snowball gain speed as it
rolls down the hill.
In closing, two thoughts. One, wear those names proudly and confidently:
thank G-d for Hadley Arkes. Two, it's time for these "senior" wonks to stop
winking at brutes like Bashar. In fact, I was so enraged reading Leverett
that I could not spit out the full name of Assad; the last two letters were
inaudible.
03/07/05: Caught by their big trap
|