|
|
|
|
Jewish World Review Feb 17, 2005 / 8 Adar I 5765
Jay D. Homnick
Has Kofi been percolating too long?
http://www.jewishworldreview.com |
I reject this view that holds Kofi Annan to be thoroughly corrupt. I
believe it possible that he is merely monstrously incompetent. But I don't
see that it makes much of a difference. If he is presiding over a system
that is rife with vitiation, does it really matter if he is complicit or
merely purblind?
Right now, we are in a particularly fevered and fertile stage of the
inquiry into this absurd scenario where the U.N. presided over Saddam's oil
sales. On Feb. 4 it was announced that Paul Volcker and his investigators
had released a partial verdict, and later that night Kofi proclaimed that he
had punished two of the men whom the report criticizes. These men are
typical of the grey eminences of these absurd international
bureaucracies; their names are not remotely familiar to us in any other
context. To see their pictures is to begin yawning.
This one fellow, Sevan, suddenly accused of deadly sins, has spent his
entire life in the pursuit and prosecution of drabness and dreariness in all
its most pompous and hollow forms. He attributes the mysterious bulking of
his bank account by one hundred and sixty thousand dollars to the bequest of
his dear maiden aunt who died recently in Cyprus. The saddest thing of all
is that I am inclined to believe him. I have a feeling that he used to send
her post cards with the Empire State building on them to gladden her doting
heart in her dotage.
Subsequently it has been announced that large quantities of Kofi's official
documents are being sought by Volcker's panel but there has been some
dispute about the sleuths reading personal e-mails. I hope this gets sorted
out quickly before we get leaks concerning Kofi's New York night life, about
which I am desperately eager to know as little as possible.
Additionally, the panel has indicated that they have requested an
'interview' with Kojo Annan, son of Kofi, who was receiving a hefty salary
from a Swiss company that was making a great deal of money off this U.N.
program. Kojo has agreed to be interviewed but somehow a few months have
elapsed during which his schedule has regrettably precluded his creating a
specifically appointed time and place for this colloquy. Volcker says that
he is looking forward to the meeting, whenever it can finally be arranged.
Now I have never been to a Chinese restaurant in China, only to the
epigones that dot our own culinary landscape, so I cannot identify the smell
of rat. But the women in my life occasionally prevail upon me to eat some
icky ichthyic offering, and this certainly smells fishy to me.
So let us review: the U.N. bungled the program and allowed Saddam to grow
richer and more powerful without helping the citizenry of Iraq. Kojo is
almost certainly crooked, and he is on the run while claiming to be
cooperating. Sevan is either just another number bumbling his way through a
maze of trickery or another trickster conniving his way through a maze of
idiocy. And Kofi is either Tony Soprano or Forrest Gump.
We had a similar situation in South Florida recently. In a neighboring
county, officers of the sheriff's department were caught forcing one felon
to admit to one hundred and forty or so crimes in order to clear their
caseload of unsolved crime. The deception was unmasked when his attorney
noticed that sixty of those were committed while he was in prison on one
minor infraction or another. When this was all revealed in the press, the
sheriff held a press conference firing those officers and promising a
thoroughgoing internal investigation. A few months later the voters
returned him to office.
It seems to me that if you have one hundred and forty cases declared solved
by your office and at least sixty of them are absurd on their face that your
ability to undo this is a fair mark of your competence. If that slips past,
you are either in on the conspiracy or out to lunch. In either case, you
should be replaced.
In Britain they call it "taking responsibility". If a government minister
presides over a major debacle, he is expected to resign even before the
investigation determines if his fault lies in malice or ignorance. The
question of complicity or conspiracy becomes an abstract legal question that
may be determined over time by branches of law enforcement. But the issue
of unworthiness for office is considered to be settled immediately.
Is Kofi a great criminal mastermind? Is Kofi a great administrative
dunderhead? I cannot give a definitively affirmative response to either one
of these questions. But I know that there is one 'Yes' answer between the
two. Bottom line: it's Kofi break time, we should not keep Annan
12/24/04: A prima facie case for intervention
|