Jewish World Review Feb. 4, 2004 / 12 Shevat, 5764
Elections in the age of terror
The maximum danger to America is not from terrorists but from terrorists using weapons of mass
destruction. Al Qaeda's murderous assault of September 11 was appalling. But being brutally objective,
America could withstand several such attacks. However, assaults by nuclear or biological weapons could
bring us to our knees. Scores of millions could be killed, and we could stop functioning as an economic and
It is that supreme danger that has correctly riveted the mind and energy of President Bush. And it is
that fact that is being almost entirely ignored by the politicians and the media in their current obsession with
the search for Iraq's WMD.
To defend against that doomsday horror, the president announced the necessary affirmative strategy in
his State of the Union in 2002 Go after the weapons (and the rogue nations or others that make them), and
go after the delivery system: the terrorists. (And, as a defensive measure, improve our homeland security and
prepare to provide relief for the victims of any terrorist attack that gets through.)
The terrorists are the more elusive target because they have no fixed address. Running them all to
ground will be a constant, generational task, mitigated only by changing the culture that breeds such monsters.
But neutralizing the sources of possible WMD is a project of more or less fixed dimensions (although al
Qaeda is reported to be trying to concoct their own biological weapons).
Countries that have the capacity, and are reasonably suspected of potentially being willing to transfer
them to terrorists, number only six: Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Libya and Syria. Whether or not any of
those six suspect rogue countries currently have large stockpiles of such weapons is irrelevant to America's
security challenge. They must all be neutralized as threats: one way or another.
Now, we are in the election year, and it is time to judge the president on his performance in executing
on his anti-terrorism strategy. How has he done in running down terrorists? How many rogue states are still
threats? Have we made reasonable progress on homeland security?
So far in the election year, aside from observing that Osama has not been caught, the Democrats have
not yet provided a considered assessment of progress or lack of progress. Neither have we heard the
president make his case in detail for the progress to date he believes we have made running to ground the
terrorists. Of course his greatest success was the Afghan War, which removed al Qaeda and the Taliban from
governance of Afghanistan. The record is more developed regarding the neutralization of the WMD threat
from rogue states. As a result of American and British military and diplomatic efforts since September 11,
Libya and Pakistan seem to have changed their policy, for the time being at least, away from intentionally
providing terrorists with WMD (although the divided loyalties within the Pakistani government require constant
and increased attention).
Iran and North Korea are currently the targets of intense diplomatic efforts to eliminate their weapons. If
diplomacy doesn't succeed fairly soon, the president in 2005 (whomever he may be) will be faced with
dreadful war decisions regarding those two formidable nations.
And, to return to the current topic of such overheated political debate, Iraq is no longer a threat due to
President Bush's decision to eliminate the Iraqi WMD threat by force of arms. Whether, at the start of the war,
they had large stockpiles or not is largely only of historic interest. Saddam had developed and used such
weapons before, could do so again and could never be trusted to be responsible. The assertion that we had
him boxed in is fatuous. Neither the host Arab countries, nor the American political process could have
tolerated the indefinite stationing of a quarter million America combat troops in the Middle East. As soon as
they were pulled out, the United Nations would have ended the controls and Saddam would have been a totally
free agent once again. The Iraqi threat could be solved only by military invasion.
Thus by neutralizing (for the time being) the rogue state threats of Iraq, Libya and Pakistan, President
Bush is halfway toward the necessary objective of eliminating the rogue state WMD threat. Combined with a
cowed Syria and an active diplomatic program targeted on North Korea and Iran's weapons, that would seem
to be a record that President Bush should defend with pride.
Regarding the third element of the strategy homeland security the president has yet to describe in
detail what he judges to be improvements. Clearly there are thousands of useful projects that have been
started. The Democrats have begun to criticize insufficient cargo container searches and insufficient financial
help to localities. This is a useful debate that needs to be joined in the coming months.
Elections are always messy, self-serving affairs. But they are more than that. They are progress reports
a democratic nation gives itself on its path to realizing its aspirations. Now, in the first precedent-setting
national election in the Age of Terror, we urgently need the most rational, focused debate of which we are
collectively capable. The national media is burdened with a heavy responsibility to direct the election debate
toward an assessment of our strategic strengths and vulnerabilities.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
Tony Blankley is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.
01/28/04: There's a war on?
01/21/04: It's good that we live in ignorance of the future
01/14/04: The strange case of immigration politics
01/07/04: Funding for American presidential elections is beginning to go global
12/31/03: Make us laugh
12/24/03: War prophesies
12/17/03: Analyze this!
12/10/03: Until peace is ready to be negotiated …
12/03/03: AFL-CIO meets Monty Python
11/26/03: Republicans need to learn from the Romans
11/19/03: All of a sudden we have a responsible media?
11/12/03: To arms
11/05/03: Mayor Mike's appetite for self-destructive accusations
10/29/03: A bloody march to peace
10/22/03: Calls for a general 's head because his comments may have ruffled the feathers of our esteemed enemies!?
10/08/03: The leakers' agony
10/01/03: Managing a scandal
09/24/03: Will we have to balance our strong ethical and religious revulsion of cloning against the danger of being surpassed by a gene-manipulated super-race?
09/17/03: The skinny on the First Ladies
09/10/03: More than cynicism will be needed to defeat prez
09/03/03: Dead Man Politickin'
08/27/03: Patience is not America's long suit
08/13/03: George Will's trifecta of punitive aspirations
07/30/03: A question for the candidates: Whose side are you on?
07/23/03: When GOPers attack their leader
07/17/03: Spanish fest mirrors U.S. elections
07/09/03: On the horns of a dilemma
06/25/03: The continuing deaths of American and British soldiers in Iraq
should not be rhetorically minimized -- but sanctified
06/18/03: No reason to feel defensive about criticism of the war on terrorism
06/11/03: The Clintons self-proclaimed geniuses have no defense against the charge of cunning mendacity
06/04/03: George 'Machiavelli' Bush? Nah
05/28/03: When 'progressives' become reactionaries
05/21/03: Yes, this conservative is defending the NYTimes
05/14/03: Playing the politics of deflation
05/07/03: Only the stupid could think it'll be the economy: Comparing the Bushes
04/30/03: How to squelch increasing Iraqi distrust of America
04/25/03: Winning the war, losing the peace
04/16/03: Our own domestic Senate Republican Guard better be prepared for a grinding
04/03/03: At this human moment we need to act like humans, not just calculating analysts
04/02/03: If we could only draft Jennings' eyebrow to the cause, we wouldn't need the 4th Armored Division?
03/26/03: This war is showing the world who we really are
03/19/03: Time for America to laugh at itself
03/13/03: They're coming out of the woodwork: Russert, Buchanan and Moran
02/26/03: World history is shifting under our feet --- even our most
experienced statesmen are, effectively, inexperienced
02/19/03: The shame! We've mischaracterized the French
02/12/03: Schroeder and Chirac will be disproportionately undercutting their interests
02/05/03: We need to rise above our temporary anger and seek to preserve our bonds with our European cousins
01/29/03: Who is President Bush's stupidest opponent: Saddam Hussein or Tom Daschle?
01/22/03: We call them our European cousins --- but I demand a DNA test
01/16/03: Dems bare partisan teeth
01/02/03: Before the cheering must come the struggle
12/27/02: Long ago and far away
12/18/02: Be glad that Gore's gone?
12/11/02: What fun! A titanic, once-in-a-century partisan battle royal is in the offing
12/04/02: Kerry atwitter
11/27/02: The unThankful list
11/20/02: First the scare, then the yawn
11/13/02: It's going to be a long two years for Lefty Pelosi and the Frisco Dems
11/06/02: Technology: A pollster's worst enemy --- thank goodness!
10/31/02: Watch this election's Wheel of Fate
10/23/02: The Ari and Colin Show: Politics has never been, well, more vaudeville-like
10/09/02: Bush beats drums of realism
10/02/02: Needed: A political chromatograph to detect any true statements in the public domain
09/25/02: Buchanan's new mag
09/18/02: There are many forms of peace
09/11/02: The imperial period of our history starts
09/04/02: Memo to Powell: In periods of upheaval, the refusal to act gives aid to those bent on destruction
08/30/02: Logging old growth is a sham issue
© 2002, Creators Syndicate