Jewish World Review Sept. 24, 2003 / 27 Elul, 5763

Tony Blankley

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Will we have to balance our strong ethical and religious revulsion of cloning against the danger of being surpassed by a gene-manipulated super-race? | Hold on to your hats (and your bibles), life is about to become even more confusing.

In China, Dr. Huizhen Sheng apparently has taken donor cells from the foreskin of a 5-year-old boy and two men, and facial tissue from a woman, and put those cells inside a rabbit egg that had been stripped of almost all its rabbit DNA, and thus has created a hybrid rabbit-human embryo — from which she and her team were able to extract "human" embryonic stem cells.

Technically, the rabbit egg kept its rabbit mitochondria (the chemical power source for a cell), so the embryos are not allowed to "develop" (e.g., live) for more than a few days. However, their product — embryonic stem cells (ESCs) — presumably will be usable to establish more ESCs for both research and applied purposes. By not requiring human eggs (until now the only source of human ESCs), the Chinese have gone around the problem of both the cost and risk of human egg retrieval procedures. There are abundant rabbit eggs because — rabbits, well, ... breed like rabbits and can't complain. Dr. Sheng's objective is to be able to cure many diseases and advance genetic engineering technologies.

Now, you and your local congressman may well wish to ban all hybrid species breeding to assure that we don't find in our midst humans with buck teeth, floppy ears and an insatiable lust for carrots. But the political significance of this Chinese rabbit chimera is that it is just a small part of an official Chinese plan to lead the world in genetic engineering technologies. China is going to pass legislation this year that will ensure that China has the most deregulated legal setting in the world for biotechnology. They plan to mass-produce human organs from "sacrificial" hybrid species embryos.

Donate to JWR

The cloning rules are being written by the Chinese Academy of Science. The Chinese government will start funding — initially at over a $100,000,000 per annum — their National Center for Biotechnology Development and their Human Tissues Research and Development Center in Shanghai. These centers are increasingly being staffed by Chinese students who studied in America and Europe, but are returning to exploit the lack of restrictions in China. The London Daily Telegraph reported that Zhu Xiarong, one of the scientists, believes that the "revolutionary genetic research which is going to take place will lead to industrialization of cloning. ... I quit my former post ... to become involved. My salary level dropped by half ... Yet I don't think I have made a sacrifice. I have a great career — and stock options."

Meanwhile, here in the United States, we are having an intense ethical debate on whether to permit any new ESC lines to be created — even for medical research purposes. But, I suspect that if current trends continue, in a few years we will be having a more urgent debate on whether to let the Red Chinese continue to race ahead of us on the entire bioengineering front, because the potential for strategic geopolitical advantage over us is immense.

The genetic process is vastly more complex and subtle than was first thought. Each gene affects many traits, and many genes play a role in each trait. Moreover, genes function throughout our lives — turning on and off various life forces in our bodies and brains. And, as Matt Ridley, a wonderful science writer, has explained, the environment in which genes exist have a much bigger role in how the genes behave than was recently thought. Thus, vast research is required before practical genetic engineering of a high order is possible. But it is possible — and fairly quickly in a country that places no ethical limitations on such research. The implications are breathtaking.

For example, it is already known that the ASPM gene on human chromosome No. 1 regulates the number of times neuronal stem cells divide inside the embryonic brain about two weeks after conception, thus determining the number of neurons the adult brain will have. Assuming proper synapse, the more neurons, the higher the potential intelligence of the individual.

Of course, environment also plays a measurable part in usable human intelligence — but if the genetic part can be manipulated upward on an "industrial" basis in a population — there will probably prove to be no reason why, within a few decades, a group of super intelligent people could not be formed.

Moreover, bio-engineering may be able to physically improve man across the entire spectrum of our functions — yielding extraordinary economic as well as strategic advantages. (Neanderthal man was a magnificently successful early man. But when he met the more intelligent CroMagnon man, he quickly went extinct.)

Of course, mistakes will be made. Island of Dr. Moreau-like monsters may well be formed. The Divine may punish a people who presume to tinker with His handiwork. But, as the Chinese push forward, hell-bent for industrial levels of genetic manipulation and cloning, supported by the massive bioengineering research they are now beginning to fund, American voters and congressmen will have to balance their strong ethical and religious revulsion of cloning against the danger of being surpassed by a gene-manipulated super-race. John Kennedy won the presidency in 1960 warning of a missile gap with the Soviets. Will some future president win on the warning of a brain gap with the Red Chinese?

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Tony Blankley is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.

09/17/03: The skinny on the First Ladies
09/10/03: More than cynicism will be needed to defeat prez
09/03/03: Dead Man Politickin'
08/27/03: Patience is not America's long suit
08/13/03: George Will's trifecta of punitive aspirations
07/30/03: A question for the candidates: Whose side are you on?
07/23/03: When GOPers attack their leader
07/17/03: Spanish fest mirrors U.S. elections
07/09/03: On the horns of a dilemma
06/25/03: The continuing deaths of American and British soldiers in Iraq should not be rhetorically minimized -- but sanctified
06/18/03: No reason to feel defensive about criticism of the war on terrorism
06/11/03: The Clintons — self-proclaimed geniuses — have no defense against the charge of cunning mendacity
06/04/03: George 'Machiavelli' Bush? Nah
05/28/03: When 'progressives' become reactionaries
05/21/03: Yes, this conservative is defending the NYTimes
05/14/03: Playing the politics of deflation
05/07/03: Only the stupid could think it'll be the economy: Comparing the Bushes 04/30/03: How to squelch increasing Iraqi distrust of America
04/25/03: Winning the war, losing the peace
04/16/03: Our own domestic Senate Republican Guard better be prepared for a grinding
04/03/03: At this human moment we need to act like humans, not just calculating analysts
04/02/03: If we could only draft Jennings' eyebrow to the cause, we wouldn't need the 4th Armored Division?
03/26/03: This war is showing the world who we really are
03/19/03: Time for America to laugh at itself
03/13/03: They're coming out of the woodwork: Russert, Buchanan and Moran
03/05/03: Franc-tireur
02/26/03: World history is shifting under our feet --- even our most experienced statesmen are, effectively, inexperienced
02/19/03: The shame! We've mischaracterized the French 02/12/03: Schroeder and Chirac will be disproportionately undercutting their interests
02/05/03: We need to rise above our temporary anger and seek to preserve our bonds with our European cousins
01/29/03: Who is President Bush's stupidest opponent: Saddam Hussein or Tom Daschle?
01/22/03: We call them our European cousins --- but I demand a DNA test
01/16/03: Dems bare partisan teeth
01/02/03: Before the cheering must come the struggle
12/27/02: Long ago and far away
12/18/02: Be glad that Gore's gone?
12/11/02: What fun! A titanic, once-in-a-century partisan battle royal is in the offing
12/04/02: Kerry atwitter
11/27/02: The unThankful list
11/20/02: First the scare, then the yawn
11/13/02: It's going to be a long two years for Lefty Pelosi and the Frisco Dems
11/06/02: Technology: A pollster's worst enemy --- thank goodness!
10/31/02: Watch this election's Wheel of Fate
10/23/02: The Ari and Colin Show: Politics has never been, well, more vaudeville-like
10/09/02: Bush beats drums of realism
10/02/02: Needed: A political chromatograph to detect any true statements in the public domain
09/25/02: Buchanan's new mag
09/18/02: There are many forms of peace
09/11/02: The imperial period of our history starts
09/04/02: Memo to Powell: In periods of upheaval, the refusal to act gives aid to those bent on destruction
08/30/02: Logging old growth is a sham issue

© 2002, Creators Syndicate