Jewish World Review Sept. 17, 2003 / 20 Elul, 5763

Tony Blankley

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

The skinny on the First Ladies | This is not a book review column, but I have read a book that justifies more national comment than it has yet received. "Rating the First Ladies" by John B. Roberts II, is an absorbing book that accomplishes something never before attempted: assessing, in one book, the explicitly political contributions of each of the 37 first ladies to the presidents of the United States — from Martha Washington to Laura Bush.

Of course there have been many books that describe the social duties of first ladies. But by focusing on their political contributions (or lack thereof), Roberts has painted fascinating parallel histories of both presidential politics and the evolving role of women in America. Although I like to think that I am reasonably well read on America's political history, I learned something interesting, often revelatory, about those histories on almost every page. While the scholarship of the book is impeccable, I found value in the book because of the sophisticated political insights of the author, who has been a major behind-the-scenes political operative in Washington's presidential politics since the early 1980s. Roberts was a senior member of Ronald Reagan's political office in the White House and in his re-election campaign. He was also a senior strategist in the Republican Congressional campaigns of the 1990s. (Disclaimer: I know the author well from my political years with President Reagan and Newt Gingrich.) The readers get the same astute analysis from Roberts that President Reagan received from him. Imagine reading a hard-eyed Robert Novak column ripping into President Grant's crooked first lady Julia Dent Grant, and you will have some sense of how these chapters can read — when the first ladies deserve it. Roberts is very smart. He is also very well connected. His chapters on Reagan and George H.W. Bush break new ground on behind-the-scenes political decision-making in those presidencies. For example, his chapter on Barbara Bush makes news (not yet reported as of this writing) that it was Barbara Bush not the campaign manager Lee Atwater who made the decisive case for use of the controversial Willy Horton ads that won Bush the presidency. According to Robert's inside account, Atwater and George W. Bush first had to convince Barbara, who then made the case to the reluctant President Bush. There are other newly revealed items about the behind-the-scenes operations that took down Geraldine Ferraro in that campaign. I thought I was behind the scenes of that campaign — but apparently not as deeply behind the scenes as Roberts was. Very interesting. Although Roberts is a former professional Republican operative, he is at least as hard on the Republican as he is on the Democratic first ladies. For example, he gives a decidedly uncomplimentary account of how Barbara Bush chose literacy as her charitable endeavor, and he was coolly impartial in contrasting the political acumen of Herbert Hoover's first lady — Lou Henry Hoover — unfavorably with that of FDR's Eleanor. But he also quotes from surprisingly vivid private correspondence of Eleanor Roosevelt to support his explicit characterization of her as a lesbian. Particularly in the earlier chapters on the 19th-century first ladies, Roberts brings to bear his Oxford-trained art history knowledge to assess the political implications that flowed from furniture and fashion decisions by first ladies. Redecorating the White House has been causing political problems for presidents for 200 years now. It didn't start with Nancy Reagan, as the reader learns throughout this book. Nor did negative campaigning start recently. It may surprise many readers to learn from this book that first ladies have been both the victims and the instigators of negative campaign operations for most of our history. "Rating First Ladies" is not all hard-edged political analysis. Each chapter is an astute — and sometimes enchanting — invocation of a full personality. Male readers would have to have a heart of stone not to wish they could share a dance with the blond, violet-eyed pixie, Harriet Lane — the bachelor President James Buchanan's niece, who served as his first lady. Roberts brings to life the mischievous charm of this young lady, who captured the hearts of all who met her — from Queen Victoria to the gimlet-eyed wives of United States senators. We meet "Sahara Sarah" Polk, so called in her time because she barred liquor from the White House — thus keeping it dry as the Sahara. We also encounter darkly the mentally ill Ida McKinley, whose husband President William McKinley would suddenly throw a large handkerchief over her head at state dinners when she started having fits. All those 19th century presidencies will never merge in your mind again, after reading this book. And the 20th century first ladies you thought you knew something about emerge as both stronger and much more interesting than you could possibly imagine. "Rating the First Ladies" is a first-rate book.

Every weekday publishes what many in Washington and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Tony Blankley is editorial page editor of The Washington Times. Comment by clicking here.

09/10/03: More than cynicism will be needed to defeat prez
09/03/03: Dead Man Politickin'
08/27/03: Patience is not America's long suit
08/13/03: George Will's trifecta of punitive aspirations
07/30/03: A question for the candidates: Whose side are you on?
07/23/03: When GOPers attack their leader
07/17/03: Spanish fest mirrors U.S. elections
07/09/03: On the horns of a dilemma
06/25/03: The continuing deaths of American and British soldiers in Iraq should not be rhetorically minimized -- but sanctified
06/18/03: No reason to feel defensive about criticism of the war on terrorism
06/11/03: The Clintons — self-proclaimed geniuses — have no defense against the charge of cunning mendacity
06/04/03: George 'Machiavelli' Bush? Nah
05/28/03: When 'progressives' become reactionaries
05/21/03: Yes, this conservative is defending the NYTimes
05/14/03: Playing the politics of deflation
05/07/03: Only the stupid could think it'll be the economy: Comparing the Bushes 04/30/03: How to squelch increasing Iraqi distrust of America
04/25/03: Winning the war, losing the peace
04/16/03: Our own domestic Senate Republican Guard better be prepared for a grinding
04/03/03: At this human moment we need to act like humans, not just calculating analysts
04/02/03: If we could only draft Jennings' eyebrow to the cause, we wouldn't need the 4th Armored Division?
03/26/03: This war is showing the world who we really are
03/19/03: Time for America to laugh at itself
03/13/03: They're coming out of the woodwork: Russert, Buchanan and Moran
03/05/03: Franc-tireur
02/26/03: World history is shifting under our feet --- even our most experienced statesmen are, effectively, inexperienced
02/19/03: The shame! We've mischaracterized the French 02/12/03: Schroeder and Chirac will be disproportionately undercutting their interests
02/05/03: We need to rise above our temporary anger and seek to preserve our bonds with our European cousins
01/29/03: Who is President Bush's stupidest opponent: Saddam Hussein or Tom Daschle?
01/22/03: We call them our European cousins --- but I demand a DNA test
01/16/03: Dems bare partisan teeth
01/02/03: Before the cheering must come the struggle
12/27/02: Long ago and far away
12/18/02: Be glad that Gore's gone?
12/11/02: What fun! A titanic, once-in-a-century partisan battle royal is in the offing
12/04/02: Kerry atwitter
11/27/02: The unThankful list
11/20/02: First the scare, then the yawn
11/13/02: It's going to be a long two years for Lefty Pelosi and the Frisco Dems
11/06/02: Technology: A pollster's worst enemy --- thank goodness!
10/31/02: Watch this election's Wheel of Fate
10/23/02: The Ari and Colin Show: Politics has never been, well, more vaudeville-like
10/09/02: Bush beats drums of realism
10/02/02: Needed: A political chromatograph to detect any true statements in the public domain
09/25/02: Buchanan's new mag
09/18/02: There are many forms of peace
09/11/02: The imperial period of our history starts
09/04/02: Memo to Powell: In periods of upheaval, the refusal to act gives aid to those bent on destruction
08/30/02: Logging old growth is a sham issue

© 2002, Creators Syndicate