Jewish World Review Jan. 3, 2003 / 29 Teves, 5763

Drs. Michael A. Glueck & Robert J. Cihak

The Medicine Men
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

If protesting is good for your health; then at least let's root for the home team | Insanity has structure. It can also have goals. And as any shrink worth her or his DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the Bible of the trade) will tell you, understanding a patient begins when you accept that, from the patient's point of view, his ideas and actions are the most natural things in the world.

On December 23rd, Reuters reported on a British study that concluded: "Taking part in protests and demonstrations can be good for your physical and mental health. . . . Psychologists at the University of Sussex found that people who get involved in campaigns, strikes and political demonstrations experience an improvement in psychological well-being that can help them overcome stress, pain, anxiety and depression. The finding fits in with other studies suggesting that positive experiences and feeling part of a group can have beneficial effects on health."

Before deconstructing this bit of insanity, two caveats. First, you don't need fancy degrees or humongous research grants to know that, yes, "positive experiences and feeling part of a group can have beneficial effects on health." Nor do we suggest that all protesters are crazy. Far from it: Many are rational and sincere people who commit themselves to their causes. What troubles us is the notion that people should protest BECAUSE it makes them feel good.

And what troubles us even more is the fact that, here in America, we've been doing it for forty years nonstop . . . with predictably insane effects on our politics and our culture. All the post-9/11 "Blame America First" blather and pro-Saddam demonstrations are only the latest examples of the insanity.

One Seattle based writer, Philip Gold, a former Georgetown University history professor, has studied this phenomenon for several decades. According to Gold, this pattern of "therapeutic protest" began during Vietnam. While a small minority of protesters were sincere, many (especially those middle-class college kids bought off by student draft deferments) were in it for the psychological payoffs - deriving unearned moral stature from their "resistance" while enjoying the "feelings" that came from being part of "The Movement." Then and since, writers as diverse as psychologists Kenneth Keniston and Robert Jay Lifton, former Yale law professor Charles Reich, and journalist James Fallows - not to mention Tom Hayden - have documented the "cult of protest" as a way of feeling good about yourself.

Nor did it end in the 60s. In a vital but now-forgotten 1983 book, "America's Quest for the Ideal Self," sociologist Peter Clecak held that, since the goal was personal growth and fulfillment, what you protested about mattered less than that you did it. When Vietnam got boring, you could always fret the whales. When whales no longer gratified - or you no longer found the people so engaging - there was always nuclear war, or nuclear energy, or apartheid, or whatever.

All in all, a lavish buffet of issues on which to snack and gorge, and to "grow."

Therapeutic protest became a fixture of American life for three other reasons. One was the modernist conceit that "real," i.e. superior, artists and intellectuals and patriots always oppose and aggravate the Establishment, even and especially if the Establishment is paying their salaries and royalties. Another, resulting from the weakening of older forms of community - neighborhood, church, lodge, etc. - was the rise of the "small groups movement." People began meeting their sociability needs through associations that made few heavy demands.

But the third factor was perhaps the most pernicious. That factor was reality. Many of the problems the protesters addressed were and remain real. Very real. Also very complex and intractable. But when the protesters' primary payoffs are psychological, reality matters less. And if it pays, psychologically, to attack your own country as the source of all the world's evils . . . maybe it's time to rethink your goals.

The reason these demonstrators have the right to protest in order to feel good is that millions of men and women before them -- and currently -- risk and give their lives for the rioter's right to speak out. We suggest that if you feel an obligation to protest, why not root for America AGAINST Osama, Al Quada, Iraq, Yassar, Hamas, the terrorists world-wide and those who openly without apology or shame pledge to kill us. Does protesting against the US somehow give them antibodal immunity against planes, trains, trucks, nucs, chemicals and the smallpox virus?

We think not. Perhaps rooting for the home team would also assuage their depression while helping the country. These rioters need to learn to cut the parental cord in a more constructive way. Perhaps constructive political demonstrations by all of us would decrease the epidemic widespread use of anti-depressant medications!

We've reached a point where therapeutic protesting actually increases the evils the protesters claim to hate. If they really want to accomplish something, it's time for a little reality testing.

Enjoy this duo's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D., is a multiple award winning writer who comments on medical- legal issues. Robert J. Cihak, M.D., is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Both JWR contributors are Harvard trained diagnostic radiologists. Comment by clicking here.


12/20/02: Obesidemic (obesity epidemic) or not?
12/20/02: Time for voluntary informed smallpox vaccinations
12/13/02: The real reason the state opposes homeschooling?
12/06/02: Conscience of a former conservative: Portrait of a political metamorphosis
11/27/02: Thanksgiving dinner hazard?
11/22/02: Time to think outside the box and inside the nucleus
11/15/02: The military should be protected from abusive environmental laws in times of war
11/11/02: Does Kyoto Treaty pose more harm than global warming?
10/31/02: Deep thoughts on Baseball, the World Series and Life: How about them Anaheim Angels?
10/23/02: "Pediatric rule" guinea pigs
10/23/02: Once the World Series ends, we need to create a Donnie Moore Day of Remembrance: Sports and mental health
10/18/02: Congress to senior patients: Do as we say not as we do for ourselves
10/11/02: Using pollution "scare labeling" to political advantage
10/04/02: The Great Asbestos Heist: Did Litigation and Junk Medical Science Helped Bring Down the World Trade Center?
09/27/02: The imminent rise of civic feminism: A far healthier national alternative in war and peace
09/20/02: A Ray A Day" to replace the daily apple?
09/13/02: Beware of celebrities hawking drugs
09/06/02: Avoid 9/11 overdose: Give blood to begin "September of Service," SOS
08/28/02: From Doubleday to strikeday: Baseball's collective anxiety attack
08/23/02: Should she or shouldn't she?: An alternative view on treating menopause with HRT
08/16/02: Cooking up defenses against germ warfare
08/02/02: Medicine, crime and canines
07/26/02: Lies, pathologic lies and the Palestinians
07/19/02: Medicare Drug Follies as in "now you see it, now you don't"
07/12/02: Anti-Profiling: A New Medically False Belief System
07/08/02: Don't procrastinate, vaccinate!
06/28/02: The scientific advances on the safe and effective deployment of DDT are being ignored, or denied. Why?
06/21/02: Sex and the system: In seeking healthcare men are different from women
06/14/02: The FDA, drug companies and life-saving drugs: Who's the fox and who's the hen now?
06/07/02: Medical Privacy Lost: A hippo on the healthcare back!
05/24/02: To clean up America's game: A (soggy) ground rule
05/10/02: Free speech is good medicine
05/03/02: Medicine's Vietnam
04/26/02: Attack on alternative medicine could lead to alternative lawsuits
04/12/02: Insure the 'crazies'?
04/09/02: No Time for Litmus Tests: In War We Need a Surgeon General and NIH, CDC, and FDA Directors
04/02/02: The scoop on soot: A dirty rotten shame?
03/22/02: Too many beautiful minds to waste: The first annual Caduceus Movie
03/15/02: Terror and transformation: Defense essential for health & state of mind
03/08/02: Diagnosis: Delusional
03/06/02: The great matzah famine
03/01/02: Is new Hippocratic Oath hypocritical?
02/15/02: Why the recent moaning about cloning?
02/08/02: Searching for Dr. Strangelove
01/15/02: Score one for the value of human life
01/04/02: Medical-legal-financial wake-up call
12/28/01: Who's afraid of a 'dirty bomb'?
12/21/01: End of medicine?
12/14/01: More heroes: Docs deserve a little credit after 9/11
11/16/01: Do we need 'Super Smallpox Saturdays'?
11/09/01: Why the post-9-11 health care debate will never be the same
11/01/01: Common sense good for our mental health
10/26/01: Your right to medical privacy --- even in terror time
10/12/01: Failed immigration policy ultimately bad for nation's mental health: Enemy within leads to epidemic of jumpy nerves
09/28/01: Can legal leopards change their spots: A treat instead of a trick
09/21/01: Civil defense again a civic duty
08/30/01: Shut down this government CAFE
08/23/01: School Bells or Jail Cells?
08/15/01: Time to take coaches to the woodshed
08/10/01: Blood, Guts & Glory: The Stem of the Stem Cell controversy

© 2002