Jewish World Review Dec. 30, 2002 / 25 Teves, 5763

Drs. Michael A. Glueck & Robert J. Cihak

The Medicine Men
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Obesidemic (obesity epidemic) or not? | As the winter holiday season continues to bless us with a surfeit of wonderful foods and drinks, it's time for us heavy duty Medicine Men to weigh in on a massive subject - is there or is there not an epidemic of obesity? Should you worry about the growing "Christmas Cummerbund" around your waist?

Of course not. We all perished ten years ago, in the global famine so confidently predicted by the environmental apocalyptics of the 1970s.

But maybe we should worry, because there's another apocalypse coming. This time, if you believe the Guardians of Girth and the Dictators of Diet, America is about to become the first nation in history to eat itself to death.

Clearly, Americans weigh more than they used to. So does much of the rest of the human race. (Spend some time looking at armor or clothing in a museum, or travel to Japan if you doubt this). But there is an epidemic of muddled diagnosis and thinking on this heavy subject. Two facts, for starters.

First, "overweight" is an arbitrary and to some extent culturally defined construct, a set of height/weight/body type/body fat percentage relationships you read off a chart. Any individual's comfortable and healthful, let alone "ideal" weight, might vary significantly. Metabolism matters. So does occupation, life-style, and myriad other factors.

Second, overweight (as opposed to genuine obesity) is in most instances the result of the human body's natural ability to store extra calories as fat - a survival-enhancing mechanism from those eons when you never knew when the next woolly mammoth barbecue might be. "Calorie" is actually a measure of heat or energy. The image of the body "burning up" calories is pretty close to the physiologic truth. For every extra 3,300 calories accumulated and stored as fat in the body, you gain one pound of fat weight, plus extra fluids.

Further, whatever the nutrient value of specific foods, all calories are created equal. As Michael Fumento, author of The Fat of the Land, writes: "Maintaining a healthful body weight is no more complex or magical than simply balancing calories burned vs. calories consumed, regardless of the source."

However, like most things connected with human existence nowadays, the adiposity issue has PC overtones, giving rise to some weighty relativism on the part of the public health crowd and their omnivorous colleagues, the trial lawyers.

They're wrong. If overweight is an epidemic, the national health statistics should show it. But statistically - and despite all the other fashionable fears - we're actually getting healthier and living longer, better lives.

So, what's going on?

At one level, snobbery. The elitist conviction that Americans can't be trusted to take care of themselves, and that the "Holier/Healthier Than Thou" crowd must therefore lobby and legislate and sue and try to force people to live according to their standards. And once again, we find social engineering and coercion flaunting "scientific" evidence that doesn't stand up, often for the simple reason that it doesn't exist to begin with. As Steve Milloy of writes "the simplistic notion that dietary fat is bad was a political and business judgment, not a scientific one."

It seems to have started back in 1977, when a Senate committee led by George McGovern issued a report advising Americans to consume less fat to avoid 'killer diseases,' then supposedly sweeping the country. The politically dutiful National Institutes of Health soon joined the anti-fat bandwagon, a move that spawned the low-fat food industry -- a boon to consumer choice but not necessarily one with a beneficial health impact.

As Fumento notes: "Since 1977-78, fat as a percentage of our diets has dropped by over 17 percent, even as obesity has increased by over 25 percent. The fewer calories we've taken in from fat, the fatter we've become."

But it was a boon to activists seeking funding and power, especially the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Center for Science in the Public Interest.

It was also a boon to environmentalists trying to destroy the beef industry.

We also suspect some non-commercialism in holiday meals, with many wives following the biblical wisdom of Sirach 26:13: "A wife's charm delights her husband, and her skill puts fat on his bones." (Revised Standard Version.) So, you want biblical justification for putting fat on your bones this holiday season, there you are.

But enough of this at holiday time. The Medicine Men conclude by wishing you all the delights and inspirations of the season.

So party hearty, if you like. And if you were lucky enough to get some exercise equipment or a health club membership for Christmas or Hanukah . . . do use it. In moderation, of course. Overdoing in getting the calories off can be more dangerous than putting them on.

Such is life. Happy Holidays. Be well.

Enjoy this duo's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.

Michael Arnold Glueck, M.D., is a multiple award winning writer who comments on medical- legal issues. Robert J. Cihak, M.D., is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Both JWR contributors are Harvard trained diagnostic radiologists. Comment by clicking here.


12/20/02: Time for voluntary informed smallpox vaccinations
12/13/02: The real reason the state opposes homeschooling?
12/06/02: Conscience of a former conservative: Portrait of a political metamorphosis
11/27/02: Thanksgiving dinner hazard?
11/22/02: Time to think outside the box and inside the nucleus
11/15/02: The military should be protected from abusive environmental laws in times of war
11/11/02: Does Kyoto Treaty pose more harm than global warming?
10/31/02: Deep thoughts on Baseball, the World Series and Life: How about them Anaheim Angels?
10/23/02: "Pediatric rule" guinea pigs
10/23/02: Once the World Series ends, we need to create a Donnie Moore Day of Remembrance: Sports and mental health
10/18/02: Congress to senior patients: Do as we say not as we do for ourselves
10/11/02: Using pollution "scare labeling" to political advantage
10/04/02: The Great Asbestos Heist: Did Litigation and Junk Medical Science Helped Bring Down the World Trade Center?
09/27/02: The imminent rise of civic feminism: A far healthier national alternative in war and peace
09/20/02: A Ray A Day" to replace the daily apple?
09/13/02: Beware of celebrities hawking drugs
09/06/02: Avoid 9/11 overdose: Give blood to begin "September of Service," SOS
08/28/02: From Doubleday to strikeday: Baseball's collective anxiety attack
08/23/02: Should she or shouldn't she?: An alternative view on treating menopause with HRT
08/16/02: Cooking up defenses against germ warfare
08/02/02: Medicine, crime and canines
07/26/02: Lies, pathologic lies and the Palestinians
07/19/02: Medicare Drug Follies as in "now you see it, now you don't"
07/12/02: Anti-Profiling: A New Medically False Belief System
07/08/02: Don't procrastinate, vaccinate!
06/28/02: The scientific advances on the safe and effective deployment of DDT are being ignored, or denied. Why?
06/21/02: Sex and the system: In seeking healthcare men are different from women
06/14/02: The FDA, drug companies and life-saving drugs: Who's the fox and who's the hen now?
06/07/02: Medical Privacy Lost: A hippo on the healthcare back!
05/24/02: To clean up America's game: A (soggy) ground rule
05/10/02: Free speech is good medicine
05/03/02: Medicine's Vietnam
04/26/02: Attack on alternative medicine could lead to alternative lawsuits
04/12/02: Insure the 'crazies'?
04/09/02: No Time for Litmus Tests: In War We Need a Surgeon General and NIH, CDC, and FDA Directors
04/02/02: The scoop on soot: A dirty rotten shame?
03/22/02: Too many beautiful minds to waste: The first annual Caduceus Movie
03/15/02: Terror and transformation: Defense essential for health & state of mind
03/08/02: Diagnosis: Delusional
03/06/02: The great matzah famine
03/01/02: Is new Hippocratic Oath hypocritical?
02/15/02: Why the recent moaning about cloning?
02/08/02: Searching for Dr. Strangelove
01/15/02: Score one for the value of human life
01/04/02: Medical-legal-financial wake-up call
12/28/01: Who's afraid of a 'dirty bomb'?
12/21/01: End of medicine?
12/14/01: More heroes: Docs deserve a little credit after 9/11
11/16/01: Do we need 'Super Smallpox Saturdays'?
11/09/01: Why the post-9-11 health care debate will never be the same
11/01/01: Common sense good for our mental health
10/26/01: Your right to medical privacy --- even in terror time
10/12/01: Failed immigration policy ultimately bad for nation's mental health: Enemy within leads to epidemic of jumpy nerves
09/28/01: Can legal leopards change their spots: A treat instead of a trick
09/21/01: Civil defense again a civic duty
08/30/01: Shut down this government CAFE
08/23/01: School Bells or Jail Cells?
08/15/01: Time to take coaches to the woodshed
08/10/01: Blood, Guts & Glory: The Stem of the Stem Cell controversy

© 2002