Jewish World Review May 20, 2002 /9 Sivan, 5762

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

(Mis)playing the popularity card | If George W. Bush learned only one thing from his father's presidency, it was that high marks in the opinion polls do not guarantee triumph in the other kind of poll. During the Gulf War in 1991, the first President Bush's approval ratings soared to nearly 90 percent. Twenty months later, he was thrown out of the White House with just 37 percent of the vote.

When you work for a popular president, it can be tempting to dismiss criticism by pointing to your man's high level of public support. Early in the first Bush administration, a reporter confronted Secretary of State James Baker with criticism by the Senate Democratic leader about the White House's diffident Eastern European policy. Baker replied smugly that ''when the president of the United States is rocking along with a 70 percent approval rating on his handling of foreign policy,'' the comments of the Senate Democratic leader could be safely ignored.

Mindful of the fate of Bush I, aides to Bush II know better than to ever make that argument. Or do they?

Last week, Democrats raised a fuss over a Republican plan to solicit money by selling a photograph of Bush taken soon after the attack on Sept. 11. The picture, which shows the president on Air Force One, talking on the phone with Vice President Dick Cheney, is perfectly innocuous. Yet it was condemned by Al Gore and Democratic Party chairman Terry McAuliffe as ''grotesque'' and ''disgraceful.''

When the criticism was put to White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, he flatly dismissed it. The photo, he said, simply showed the president ''doing his job for the American people.'' He should have stopped there. Instead he felt compelled to add, ''I think the Democrats are having a very difficult time coming to grips with the fact that this is a very popular president.''

Well, maybe they are and maybe they aren't, but two things ought to be clear. (1) Bush's popularity will not always be this high; like all presidents, he is subject to the law of political gravity. (2) The more importance the White House attaches to protecting Bush's popularity, the worse a president he will make.

When it comes to foreign policy, Bush has shown an admirable indifference to poll numbers. The media clamor notwithstanding, he announced early on that the United States would pull out of that sacred cow, the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. Simiarly, he notified Russia last December that the United States would withdraw from the 30-year-old Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, an impediment to developing a new missile defense system.

While his Middle East messages have been been somewhat muddled lately, his sympathy for Israel's war against Arab terrorism is unmistakable - as is his disgust for Yasser Arafat, whom he has refused even to meet. Just last month, Bush confirmed that the United States would play no part in an International Criminal Court - once again braving howls from the editorial pages.

But when it comes to domestic issues, that principled steadfastness is getting harder and harder to spot.

In order to claim credit for something labeled ''education reform,'' Bush allied himself with Ted Kennedy and signed a bill that vastly expands the federal role in local education but includes almost no element of meaningful school choice. In March, he waltzed away from his commitment to free trade and imposed stiff new tariffs on steel imports. His cave-in was universally seen as political - a pander to steel interests in states he needs to get reelected. But what does it profit a president to gain West Virginia and Pennsylvania, if he forfeits his reputation for standing on principle?

Last week, the president signed a bloated farm bill, a $190 billion bucket of slops that rips off American consumers in order to enrich a relative handful of farmers in the South and Midwest. This, too, was said to be politically necessary - a must if Republicans hope to win back control of the Senate. What isn't clear is how Bush and the GOP can ever win back the voters who believed them when they said they wanted to end agricultural welfare as we know it.

Presidents hoping for reelection too often hoard their political capital instead of spending some of it - they do the wrong thing, knowing it's the wrong thing, because they think it makes good politics. Sometimes they get away with it. But sometimes they succeed only in disillusioning their own supporters.

As Bush has good reason to know. In 1988, his father uttered the most famous ironclad vow in modern presidential politics (''Read my lips: No new taxes.'') Two years later he broke it - and thereby broke faith with millions of his supporters. In 1992, they were his supporters no longer, and the first George Bush was out of a job. Let the second George Bush profit from his example.

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

05/10/02: Outspoken, Muslim -- and moderate
05/10/02: The heroes in Castro's jails
05/06/02: The disappearing history term paper
05/03/02: Musings, random and otherwise
04/29/02: The canary in Europe's mine
04/15/02: Powell's crazy mission
04/12/02: The slavery reparations hustle
04/08/02: Peace at any price = war
03/26/02: Decency matters most, Caleb
03/22/02: The U.S. embargo and Cuba's future
03/19/02: The keepers of Cuba's conscience
03/15/02: A walk in Havana
02/26/02: Buchanan's lament
02/12/02: What 'peace' means to Arafat
02/05/02: Antismoking: Who pays?
02/01/02: Turn the Saudis
01/25/02: Making MLK cry
01/21/02: Ted to tax cut: Drop dead
01/18/02: Musings random and otherwise
01/14/02: An ultimatum to Saudi Arabia
01/11/02: Friendship, Saudi-style
01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe