Jewish World Review Jan. 11, 2002 / 27 Teves, 5762

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Friendship, Saudi-style -- SOME of the world's most offensive contemporary fiction is being produced by the government of Saudi Arabia.

Consider the mainstream Saudi newspaper Al-Jazeera, which recently asserted that terrorism against the United States does not stem from Islamist extremism with roots in Saudi Arabia. On the contrary, the paper explained, "the curricula in the Western schools . . . show that the West itself trains terrorists." (The translation is by the invaluable Middle East Media Research Institute, and can be found on its web site,

According to Al-Jazeera, which like all Saudi papers is government-controlled, many US and British schools assign "a book called 'The Mission,' put out by Express Publishing House in Britain." One chapter describes a "scenario in which terrorists hijack a plane and crash it into a nuclear reactor. This made a director of a nuclear reactor in the U.S. take a light plane and crash it into the reactor to see what would happen."

What's more, the book describes "an American research study in which anthrax was sprayed from the southern end of Manhattan. . . . Half of those exposed to the virus became ill, and half of those who became ill died. The number of victims exceeded 600,000."

Planes crashing into nuclear plants? Anthrax research that killed 600,000 New Yorkers? Textbooks that promote terrorism? To Americans, this bizarre confection is laughable, and the claim that it is taught in US schools is absurd on its face.

But it probably didn't seem absurd to the readers of Al-Jazeera, to whom it was presented as a factual rebuttal to a slur on Muslim honor. What does it say about the government of Saudi Arabia that it uses its mass media to disseminate such dishonest, anti-American trash?

More fiction:

"The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has been at the forefront of international efforts in fighting terrorism and for combating money-laundering activities," announces a report released by the Saudi embassy in Washington. It expresses Saudi pride at having been a "leader" in the campaign "to identify and freeze terrorist assets quickly through international cooperation."

If brazenness were an Olympic event, the Saudis would win the gold. Far from having been "at the forefront" of freezing terrorists' access to money, they have been among the leading obstacles to doing so. Their recalcitrance was such a problem that delegations of senior American officials had to be sent to Riyadh last month to plead for Saudi cooperation. In its current issue, US News and World Report says that while some progress was made, "it was like pulling teeth."

"First, the Saudis had balked at freezing bank accounts Washington said were linked to terrorists. Then they demanded proof that Saudi-funded charities were funneling money to terrorists. On Dec. 8, the first day of [one] delegation's visit, Prince Nayef, the interior minister, was telling reporters he still did not even believe that 15 of the 19 Sep. 11 hijackers were Saudis."

Nayef, by the way, shows promise as an author of Saudi fiction. "It's true that Saudi citizens were in the planes," he was saying more than three months after the mass-murders in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania, "but who can be certain whether they were behind the attacks?"

The flying lessons those Saudis took argues for their innocence, Nayef claims. "To pilot planes of this caliber," he told an interviewer, "requires more than being a beginner." As for the will found in Mohammed Atta's luggage -- the one exhorting the men to "welcome death for the sake of Allah" -- it proves nothing, Nayef says. "Almost every Muslim writes a will before embarking on a plane or a boat journey."

The line from the Bush administration is that the Saudis are loyal allies who have been most cooperative in the war on terrorism. Diplomatic sweet-talk has its place in international affairs, but not when it becomes a substitute for clear thought. The Saudis are not loyal allies and they have not been most cooperative. What does Washington gain by pretending otherwise?

The Saudi government seems quite unfazed by the fact that the savagery that sent so many innocents to their deaths on Sept. 11 was carried out by Saudi citizens, incubated with Saudi money, and rooted in Saudi religious extremism. On the three-month anniversary of those attacks, foreign leaders worldwide attended memorial ceremonies sponsored by American embassies. But in Saudi Arabia, Douglas Jehl reported in The New York Times, there was no public acknowledgement of any kind:

"The only event known to have taken place in the kingdom was a one-minute moment of silence late Tuesday afternoon at the United States Embassy in Riyadh, which no Saudi officials attended."

For too long we have pretended that Saudi Arabia is our fast friend and a key to stability in the Middle East. In truth, it is neither. It's time we left the fictions to Riyadh, and adjusted our foreign policy to the real world.

Jeff Jacoby is a Boston Globe columnist. Comment by clicking here.

01/07/02: Shakedown at Harvard
01/04/02: More guns, more safety
01/02/02: Smears and slanders from the Left
12/28/01: Congress gives to others -- and itself
12/24/01: The littlest peacemakers
12/20/01: How to condemn terror
12/18/01: Greenland once was
12/14/01: Parents who never said ''no''
12/11/01: Wit and (economic) wisdom
12/04/01: The war against Israel goes on
11/30/01: Tribunals, motorcycles -- and freedom
11/19/01: Friendship and the House of Saud
11/12/01: The Justice Department's unjust monopoly
11/09/01: Muslim, but not extremist
11/02/01: Too good for Oprah
10/29/01: Journalism and the 'neutrality fetish'
10/26/01: Derail these subsidies
10/22/01: Good and evil in the New York Times
10/15/01: Rush Limbaugh's ear
10/08/01: With allies like these
10/01/01: An unpardonable act
09/25/01: Speaking out against terror
09/21/01: What the terrorists saw
09/17/01: Calling evil by its name
09/13/01: Our enemies mean what they say
09/04/01: The real bigots
08/31/01: Shrugging at genocide
08/28/01: Big Brother's privacy -- or ours?
08/24/01: The mufti's message of hate
08/21/01: Remembering the 'Wall of Shame'
08/16/01: If I were the editor ...
08/14/01: If I were the Transportation Czar ...
08/10/01: Import quotas 'steel' from us all
08/07/01: Is gay "marriage" a threat?
08/03/01: A colorblind nominee
07/27/01: Eminent-domain tortures
07/24/01: On protecting the flag ... and drivers ... and immigrants
07/20/01: Dying for better mileage
07/17/01: Why Americans would rather drive
07/13/01: Do these cabbies look like bigots?
07/10/01: 'Defeated in the bedroom'
07/06/01: Who's white? Who's Hispanic? Who cares?
07/02/01: Big(oted) man on campus
06/29/01: Still appeasing China's dictators
06/21/01: Cuban liberty: A test for Bush
06/19/01: The feeble 'arguments' against capital punishment
06/12/01: What energy crisis?
06/08/01: A jewel in the crown of self-government
05/31/01: The settlement myth
05/25/01: An award JFK would have liked
05/22/01: No Internet taxes? No problem
05/18/01: Heather has five mommies (and a daddy)
05/15/01: An execution, not a lynching
05/11/01: Losing the common tongue
05/08/01: Olympics 2008: Say no to Beijing
05/04/01: Do welfare mothers a kindness: Make them work
05/01/01: Another man's child
04/24/01: Sharon should have said no
04/02/01: The Inhumane Society
03/30/01: To have a friend, Caleb, be a friend
03/27/01: Is Chief Wahoo racist?
03/22/01: Ending the Clinton appeasement
03/20/01: They're coming for you
03/16/01: Kennedy v. Kennedy
03/13/01: We should see McVeigh die
03/09/01: The Taliban's wrecking job
03/07/01: The No. 1 reason to cut taxes
03/02/01: A Harvard candidate's silence on free speech
02/27/01: A lesson from Birmingham jail
02/20/01: How Jimmy Carter got his good name back
02/15/01: Cashing in on the presidency
02/09/01: The debt for slavery -- and for freedom
02/06/01: The reparations calculation
02/01/01: The freedom not to say 'amen'
01/29/01: Chavez's 'hypocrisy': Take a closer look
01/26/01: Good-bye, good riddance
01/23/01: When everything changed (mostly for the better)
01/19/01: The real zealots
01/16/01: Pardon Clinton?
01/11/01: The fanaticism of Linda Chavez
01/09/01: When Jerusalem was divided
12/29/00 Liberal hate speech, 2000
12/15/00Does the Constitution expect poor children be condemned to lousy government schools?
12/08/00 Powell is wrong man to run State Department
12/05/00 The 'MCAS' teens give each other
12/01/00 Turning his back on the Vietnamese -- again
11/23/00 Why were the Pilgrims thankful?
11/21/00 The fruit of this 'peace process' is war
11/13/00 Unleashing the lawyers
11/17/00 Gore's mark on history
40 reasons to say NO to Gore

© 2002, Boston Globe