|
|
|
Jewish World Review April 19, 2001 / 26 Nissan, 5761
Chris Matthews
I believe that "sweet strength," displayed so
intelligently last week, is the great victor of the
Hainan Island incident. We need to show more of it
if we are to avoid a far greater crisis in the Far East
down the road.
To begin with, how about seeing the world's largest
nation as our "strategic partner?" That was
President Clinton's phrase. It was the wording
President Bush himself used recently before
catching himself and resorting to that awful
hard-liners' term: "strategic competitor."
Doesn't the successful return of our 24 crewmen
from Hainan Island argue for a return to the more
positive brand of Washington-Beijing diplomacy?
We tried the hard line and learned its limitations.
First we landed our plane on Chinese territory
without permission. Second, we demanded the
crew and plane's prompt return. We treated the life
of a courageous if reckless Chinese pilot as
unworthy of note, a proud country's territorial
integrity unworthy of respect.
Fortunately for all, we corrected our course before
an "incident" became a full-blown international
crisis. We found the right language to express
sorrow for the "missing pilot and aircraft," admitted
the desperate landing of a "severely crippled
aircraft" in Chinese territory without "verbal
clearance."
There's a plus-side. In learning to use the right
language, America gained a potent and timely lesson
in Chinese attitudes. The government and people of
that great land believe that the United States seeks
to establish "hegemony" over the entire globe.
Are they right? Let's take the continents one at a
time.
Europe? You got to believe it! Nothing bothers
policy-makers here more than the thought that the
old continent might actually build a peacekeeping
force that doesn't require our membership.
North and South America? The Monroe Doctrine is
19th century American English for "hegemony" in
this hemisphere.
The Mideast? The Persian Gulf? We're the boss.
Africa? Only when we think about it.
Asia? The presence of our 7th Fleet in the South
China Sea, the constant reconnaissance of the
Chinese coastline, the prospect of advanced arm
sales to Taiwan? If you were a pro-democracy
student in Beijing, wouldn't you take this as
evidence that the United States wants to dominate
the other side of the planet?
Add to this the recent word from the Pentagon that
the United States has shifted its strategy from
fighting a war in Europe to fighting one in Asia.
What country do you - or the Chinese - think we're
talking about?
Let's not miss the lesson we learned these past two
weeks. We tried the tough talk. It got us nowhere.
Then we tried diplomacy, the linguistic and cultural
expertise of the State Department, plus what the
former Democratic governor of New York calls
Secretary Powell's "sweet strength."
Let's go with what worked.
If we're smart as well as strong, we can be strong in
Asia without turning the U.S.-Chinese relationship
sour.
|