Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review July 26, 2000/ 23 Tamuz, 5760

Lawrence Kudlow

Kudlow
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Dr. Laura
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Investor Class Rising

http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- ANALYSTS keep obsessing about second quarter corporate profits. But that's yesterday's news. The real-time stock market is already a couple of weeks into the third quarter.

It's tomorrow's earnings that drive today's share prices. But future profits will be heavily influenced by the outlook for tax policy, which is the principle regulator of economic growth.

And the really big news is the unexpected tax-cutting tide coming from Congress. It's the new, new thing in economic policy. A pro-growth, pro-investor, pro-profits and pro-wealth creation tonic for the stock market.

The latest new tax-cut thing is the passage of an estate tax phase-out, which swept the Senate by a 59 to 39 margin. Nine Democrats, or 20% of their caucus, voted to repeal the so-called death tax. This is new news. It shows the political clout of the new Investor Class, a group that I believe is the invisible whip-hand of American politics today.

Current law imposes a 55% marginal tax-rate on estates above $675,000 for singles and $1.35 million for marrieds. But in a decade where household wealth has increased by $20 trillion, those thresholds are way too low. And the 55% tax-rate is the last lingering tax remnant above 50%. All the rest were slashed by Reagan in 1981 and 1986.

Think of this. A family that owns an annually increasing 401(k), along with a variable annuity or a variable life insurance contract, as well as a medium-sized home, will have little difficulty clearing the $1.35 million wealth threshold in today's prosperous Internet economy.

Think of this. All that old-time religion political rhetoric about not helping rich people misses the very essence of current economic life. More and more folks are getting rich on a daily basis. And those that haven't already, aspire to do so in the near future.

This prosperity spirit has become so pervasive that even President Clinton had to take time out from his class warfare bashing of the rich in order to present his own estate tax-cut plan. Which, when Veep AlGore stops trashing oil, insurance and tobacco companies on the campaign trail, he supports.

The president says he will veto the Republican estate tax elimination plan. Perhaps he will. But recall, in 1997 he vetoed the capital gains tax-cut a couple of times before he finally signed it into law. So it's not over until it's over.

Besides helping too many super-rich people, the president's big gripe against the Republican bill is cost. According to the Clinton Treasury Department, the GOP bill will cost nearly a trillion dollars over ten years. The president's bill, meanwhile, would only lose a hundred billion. Guess you get what you pay for.

But ace supply-side revenue estimators Gary and Aldona Robbins, who worked in the Reagan Treasury Department, think otherwise. They believe that the growth- and wealth-creating incentive effects of abolishing the 55% estate tax-rate would generate $700 billion in added gross domestic product.

The economic principle here is simple: by taxing wealth less, more wealth will be supplied. So will more risk-taking. New and larger estates are made more likely if the estate tax is eliminated.

So, the Robbins' believe, after seven years nearly $150 billion in added tax revenue would virtually cancel any net revenue loss. Of course, in a dynamic model of economic growth, substantial stock market appreciation as a result of this pro-growth tax-cut would generate an avalanche of capital gains-related tax revenues. In the end, estate tax elimination would probably be revenue positive, actually increasing projected budget surpluses.

No wonder stock market investors are in a buying mood. They figure that sooner or later, pro-growth tax-cuts are coming. As economist Arthur Laffer recently put it, the growing stockpile of anticipated Federal surpluses amounts to "an inventory of future tax-cuts."

Clinton may veto the estate tax cut, but GOP Congressional leaders have more up their sleeve. There's a marriage penalty relief bill that would raise the standard deduction to $8,800 and broaden the 28% income tax bracket threshold to prevent real income bracket creep.

Also, both the Senate and House tax-writing committees are cooking up a super-saver expansion of 401(k)s and IRAs. This may also include "back-ended" Roth IRAs. All pro-investor, pro-growth and pro-wealth.

And don't forget, the Republicans have already passed and the president has signed a bill to lower the Social Security earnings test for post-retirement working seniors. Also a pro-productivity and pro-growth measure. All those graybeards will teach the sub-genXers how to show up on time, tie their ties and . . . spell and, like . . . speak properly.

I can't remember who first said it, but Republicans were put on this planet in order to cut taxes. That's really all they ever do well, when they do it.

So the stock market is probably just as pleasantly surprised as I am that the GOP Congress is in fact fulfilling its heavenly purpose.

Therefore, just as the pessimistic bubbleheads and irrational expectionists thought their day had come, the prospect of pro-growth tax-cuts has revived the equity market animal spirits. If not now, then future Congresses and future presidents will be taking action to bolster future earnings.


JWR contributor Lawrence Kudlow is chief economist for CNBC. He is the author of American Abundance: The New Economic & Moral Prosperity. Send your comments about his column by clicking here.

Up

07/17/00: The rising tide of national prosperity is lifting all boats
07/11/00: On Soft landings
06/29/00: Is the sky falling?
06/21/00: Internet-more-important-than-Fed update
06/14/00: The judicial hacker
05/16/00: Front-View Windshield
05/09/00: Don't Overreact
05/05/00: Give it Back
05/01/00: Wealth and Capital
04/18/00: Growth, Freedom and the New Investor Class--Stay the course
04/13/00: Correct Value
03/28/00: Governments roil the Markets
03/28/00: Fed should keep its powder dry
03/14/00: Reduce Debt, Derail Economy
02/17/00: Unsettled
02/10/00: Bush's Footprints
01/25/00: To preserve its standing as the world's number one economic power
01/06/00: It's not the '70s
12/28/99: They missed it
12/23/99: Bonditos
12/20/99: Dracula's Curve
12/16/99: When Alan Greenspan sneezes, Wall Street economists catch cold
12/10/99: Y2K-Related Cash
11/23/99: Y2K Money: Inflationary or Not?
11/16/99: Investor Retaliation
11/05/99: Rosy Lives
10/29/99: Drain Reserves
10/22/99: Supply-Side Is Mainstream
10/14/99: Y2K will likely bring more prosperity
10/07/99: Clinton's tax-cut veto
10/01/99: What's really bugging the stock market?
09/23/99: Growth Trade
09/09/99: Bad Dollar Logic
09/09/99: Buttered bread
08/31/99: Bull Market Alive and Well
08/26/99: Let Prices Rule
08/19/99: Blame OPEC, Not Growth


©1999, Lawrence Kudlow