Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review April 25, 2000 /20 Nissan, 5760

Morton Kondracke

Kondracke
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports
Newswatch

Trakdata


Should Clinton be indicted?


http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- OUR LONG NATIONAL SOAP OPERA is supposed to be over in nine months, but Independent Counsel Robert W. Ray may extend it by indicting President Clinton when he leaves office.

On balance, I hope Ray decides not to, if all he can charge Clinton with is perjury for making false statements in the Monica Lewinsky case.

But it's a very close call. As Clinton proved once again before the American Society of Newspaper Editors last week, he is unrepentant about the damage he's caused to the country.

He admits only to making "a terrible personal mistake" -- by which he presumably means only his sexual involvement with Lewinsky.

Beyond that, he claims, he is a victim -- no, a hero. At the ASNE, he referred favorably to two recent books, one by Jeffrey Toobin and another by Joe Conason and Gene Lyons, clearly indicating that he considers himself the unfair target of what his wife once called "a vast right-wing conspiracy."

Indeed, there is some evidence that his enemies in Arkansas and Washington -- including Paula Jones' lawyers and ex-Independent Counsel Ken Starr -- did conspire to set a "perjury trap" for him.

It's an interesting question -- why Clinton has so many enemies. He asserts it's because he's doing political and social justice, and conservatives hate him for it.

I think that's baloney. I think he drives moralists to distraction because he commits one deceit and sexual excess after another and constantly gets away with it. They become obsessed trying to make "the rules" apply to him.

But regardless of his enemies' motives, Clinton did lie in his deposition in the Paula Jones case. Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright found him in contempt of court for that. He has paid a fine, not apologized. He went on to tell the country baldfaced lies about having sex with Lewinsky. With months to think about it, he then premeditatedly repeated his falsehoods under oath to a federal grand jury.

For that and for alleged obstruction of justice, Clinton was impeached by the House. Of course, he was acquitted by the Senate.

"I am not ashamed of the fact that they impeached me," he said to the ASNE. In fact, he said, "I am proud of what we did there because I think we saved the Constitution of the United States."

Bubba
This claim is so breathtakingly outrageous, it gives a hint why people become Clinton-haters. This man plans to rewrite history to cast himself alongside Abraham Lincoln, as though beating the Lewinsky rap is equivalent to preserving the Union.

Clinton asserted that impeachment was "one of the major chapters in my defeat of the revolution" led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., as though the GOP majority elected in 1994 somehow was illegitimate, like the Confederacy.

In fact, Republicans still control Congress. And a new Pew poll indicates that by 49 percent to 33 percent, voters say that a Member who voted in favor of impeachment deserves re-election.

Clinton did good work defeating the excesses of the Gingrich revolution. But Republicans also forced him to take a moderate course that has served him well politically. Impeachment had nothing to do with policy. Moreover, it is simply false for Clinton to say that the Constitution is stronger because of what he did. To save his own skin, he repeatedly asserted prerogatives of the presidency -- and then lost them in court, permanently weakening the office.

Henceforth, thanks to Clinton, presidents can be sued and forced to testify in civil cases. The White House legal staff is not covered by lawyer-client privilege in conversations with the president or first lady. Secret Service agents can be compelled to testify about what they hear. So can political staffers.

So Clinton's shamelessness is one argument for his indictment. If he won't admit wrongdoing, maybe a jury of his peers will straighten out the record for him.

Another argument flows from the statement of numerous Democratic senators and House members that his offenses didn't rise to the level of high crimes meriting impeachment and removal -- but were ordinary crimes subject to normal judicial process. I made this argument, too.

If Ray has any new evidence -- say, of alleged obstruction of justice or attempts to silence witnesses -- I'd be for indicting Clinton.

But to rehash the Lewinsky lies all over again wouldn't do the country any good. And if Clinton won at trial, he would once again claim victimization and vindication.

Better the soap opera should end on time and Clinton go down in history as America's second impeached president -- and with a personal disapproval rating of 60 percent.



JWR contributor Morton Kondracke is executive editor of Roll Call, the newspaper of Capitol Hill. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

Up

04/24/00: Can Gore win on Bush tax cuts?
04/18/00: Levin's 'bridge' key to China trade?
04/11/00: Congress, U.S. Voters Still Aren't Ready For Campaign Reform
04/06/00: Bush, Gore Silent As Popular Culture Gets Ever Coarser
03/30/00: Is 2000 Like 1948, 1976 or 1960? Or Is This Unparalleled?
03/28/00: Will Bush, Gore Go for a Better Way To Pick Nominees?
03/23/00: Medicare cutbacks bleed hospitals
03/20/00: Chances Improve That China Trade Will Pass Congress
03/16/00: Lieberman as veep would help Gore
03/14/00: Can Bush, McCain Unite to Beat Gore?
03/09/00: Can GOP Forge Unity After Nasty McCain-Bush Race?
03/07/00: What accounts for McCain's excesses?
03/02/00: 'Debate' Proved Gore Is This Year's Best Gut-Fighter
02/29/00: Surprises! The 2000 GOP race is full of it
02/25/00: Voters want centrist in White House
02/23/00: Gore would hit McCain's record
02/15/00: Will negativity hurt McCain in S.C.?
02/10/00: How hard should Bush hit McCain?
02/08/00: Bush must retool his entire campaign
01/27/00: Could Gore beat Bush as Truman beat Dewey?
01/20/00: Big New Surplus Estimates Could Alter 2000 Politics
12/21/99: Bush improves, everyone panders
12/16/99: Prospects improve for campaign reform
12/14/99: Riots raise free trade as 2000 issue
12/10/99: Gore won GOP 'debate' in N.H.
12/07/99: Election pits Bush cuts vs. Medicare boost
12/03/99: Can race be a constructive issue in 2000?
11/19/99: White House race may be best in decades
11/16/99: Where is Bush on health care fight?
11/11/99: Will TV stop profiteering from politics?
11/09/99: Is GOP isolationist, or just partisan?
11/04/99: Gore, Bradley Run Opposite Races On Style, Substance
11/01/99: GOP, Clinton could reach deal swiftly
10/27/99: Bush to fight 'culture wars' -- positively
10/21/99: Porter, Mack: heroes on medical research
10/19/99: Gore scores among party big shots, but polls go South
10/14/99: Bush critiques could help GOP Congress
10/12/99: Congress can save health care from ruin
10/07/99: Will gun-control cause the GOP to shoot itself in the foot?
10/05/99: Gore moves: Desperate but necessary
10/01/99: Fox, Armstrong make case for NIH
09/28/99: Dems' race brightens Bush's chances
09/23/99: East Timor deflates `Clinton Doctrine'
09/21/99: Buchanan v. Bush? Yeah right
09/17/99: Candidates turn attention to poverty
09/15/99: Bush's education problem
09/09/99: Budget makes 2000 an `issues' election
09/07/99:Airport rage increases, with good reason
09/02/99: U.S. future up for grabs in 2000
08/31/99: U.S. Capitol needs visitor's center -- soon
08/24/99: Will 2000 be the year of the foreign crisis?
08/19/99: Neither party has upper hand for '99
08/17/99: Ford gets freedom medal one month early
08/12/99: There's time to catch Bush, say Gore aides
08/10/99: Rudy, Hillary try much-needed makeovers
08/09/99: GOP must launch new probe of Chinagate
08/02/99: Pols blow fiscal smoke on budget surplus
08/02/99: One campaign reform should pass: disclosure
07/27/99: Gore leads Bush in policy proposals

©1999, NEA