Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 19, 2000 / 20 Tishrei 5760

James K. Glassman

Jim Glassman
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Beating hunger --- the biggest prize --
LAST WEEKEND in Des Moines, Iowa, two scientists were awarded the World Food Prize for creating a high-protein, high-yielding corn.

Said that way it sounds a little boring. But the accomplishment is hardly dull. Five million children a year have a better chance to live because of what biochemist Evangelina Villegas of Mexico and plant geneticist Surinder Vasal of India have done.

That’s how many children the World Health Organization says die each year from malnutrition. And the so-called Quality Protein Maize, or QPM, bred by Villegas and Vargas will fill a huge nutritional gap in the diets of those children and around 800 million other people worldwide. Old-fashioned corn lacks key amino acids needed to provide the protein humans require to live.

To bring their miracle maize to market took Villegas and Vasal 30 years. One big reason for that is they for the most part relied on conventional crossbreeding techniques to develop their corn.

But they also used using modifier genes to counter the undesirable effects on yield in crossbreeding high protein corn.

In short, they engaged in genetic modification.

Over the past year, people have heard a lot of scare stories about that process. An extreme group of environmentalists, spurred on by European farmers bent on protecting their livelihoods from imports, has tried to make genetic modification of crops through biotechnology seem a dangerous enterprise. They’ve done so using junk science and scare tactics while ignoring basic scientific facts.

From Seattle, Wash., to Washington, D.C., they’ve protested against the Flavr Savr tomato, herbicide resistant soybeans and a host of other developments fostered by biotechnology. Some have gone so far as to go into experimental fields to destroy crops.

They’ve succeeded in attracting a lot of public attention, encouraging more government regulation and delaying the introduction of new products, much to the disdain of most of the scientists engaged in agricultural research.

Both Villeges and Vasal volunteered to Tech Central Station interviewers at the Des Moines conference that the concerns of the protestors were overblown. That was a view shared by almost all of the other World Food Prize laureates, and by Alan Larson, the U.S. undersecretary of State for Economics Business and Agricultural Affairs, who also noted that Europe, the source of much of the misinformation about biotechnology, runs the most protectionist agricultural systems of all. All said that biotechnology products are generally safe and that we need them to fight world hunger.

It is not difficult to understand why they think so, considering the time it took Villages and Vasal, using conventional crossbreeding to bring their corn to market.

Thirty years is a long time. Hundreds of millions of people, including more than 100 million children, died of malnutrition in the years it took Villegas and Vasal to bring their corn to market.

The longer protestors delay new advances in biotechnology, the longer it will take to introduce other nutritious foods and more productive farming practices.

False fears of “Frankenfood” may excite the public imagination, but the world can’t afford to allow them to trump the needs of starving people worldwide.

JWR contributor James K. Glassman is the host of Tech Central Station. Comment by clicking here.


10/13/00: Way to play biotech
10/12/00: Bush vs. Gore on Technology
10/11/00: Global Climate Scare: Fools Rush In
10/05/00: Avoid the Apple Trap
10/03/00: Goodbye, anti-Microsoft crusader --- and good riddance
09/29/00: Should You Invest in Tech IPOs?
09/27/00: Could technology end airline delays?
09/22/00: Don’t Forget Small Caps
09/20/00: Is the New York Times Rooting for Disaster?
09/13/00: The Best Argument Against Net Regulation
08/30/00: Political Risk in Big Drug Stocks
07/27/00: Tech Dividends
07/25/00: Government Privacy Violators
07/20/00: If I Had to Pick One Tech Stock
07/18/00: Our Favorite Lawsuit
07/13/00: Silicon Valley East
07/11/00: Election 2000: Year of the Investor Class?
07/07/00: Adventures on the
07/06/00:The Difference Between Bill Gates and Larry Ellison
06/29/00: In the Chips
06/27/00: Free market wins in Federal Court!
06/22/00: Wireless Bargains?
06/20/00: Is Your SUV Warming the Planet?
06/15/00: Shopping for Government
06/13/00: Top 10 Tech Stocks
06/08/00: Riding the eBook Wave
06/06/00: "The Last Mile"
06/02/00: Keep Buying!
05/31/00: Who Asked the FTC to Regulate Online Privacy?
05/25/00: "When It’s Time to Sell"
05/23/00: End the "Telephone Tax"
05/16/00: Time Warner Gets a Bad Rap

© 2000, Tech Central Station