Clicking on banner ads keeps JWR alive
Jewish World Review March 19, 2002 / 6 Nisan, 5762

Dr. Ed Blonz

Blonz
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Lowering sodium in canned veggies; Are natural vitamins better?


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | DEAR DR. BLONZ: I am perplexed about the differences between synthetic and natural vitamins. An article by one scientist, for example, claims that synthetic vitamin E is just as good as the natural kind, and it's cheaper. I read another article by a different scientist who recommends natural vitamin E, which he says is more readily absorbed. They are both university-trained researchers. I have been buying my vitamins from a natural-food store for years, and I have been buying the natural type. Since there are opposing answers to every question, and there is the fact that the synthetic vitamin E can be purchased just about anywhere cheaply, I want to know what the major differences are between the synthetic and natural tablets. -- J.M., Charleston, N.C.

Dear J.M.: There are definite differences between synthetic and natural vitamin E, and two important factors to consider are potency and ease of absorption. First, here are some facts about vitamin E. The main vitamin E compound is tocopherol (toe-KAH-pher-awl), which comes from the Greek words tokos (offspring) and pherein (to bear). It was so named because it was first thought to be an essential factor in reproduction. There are a number of different tocopherols in nature, the four most important ones being alpha-, beta-, gamma- and delta-tocopherol. Alpha-tocopherol is the one we hear about most, because it is the form with the greatest vitamin activity in the human body. There are natural and synthetic forms of all the tocopherols. The natural versions start with a "d," as in d-alpha-tocopherol, and synthetics start with "dl," as in dl-alpha-tocopherol.

Natural vitamin E is the most potent of the vitamin E compounds on a weight basis. Vitamin E supplements, however, are not sold by weight. They are typically sold by IU, or international units, which are a measure of biological activity. This means that 200 IU of synthetic vitamin E has the same potency as 200 IU of the natural vitamin. To complicate matters, scientists have stopped using the IU and now talk about vitamin E in terms of a more precise unit of measure, the alpha-tocopherol equivalent (alpha-TE). One alpha-TE equals 1 milligram of natural d-alpha-tocopherol, which equals 1.67 IU.

Absorption is another factor to consider, and some studies have shown that natural vitamin E is more easily absorbed. The differences, however, are not significant.

A final point is that natural vitamin E supplements often contain the beta-, gamma- and delta-tocopherols along with the alpha. A study in the December 2001 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition suggests that gamma-tocopherol, the most prominent form of vitamin E in many plant seeds, has some unique beneficial qualities. And one year earlier, in the December 2000 Journal of the National Cancer Institute, a population study found that those with the highest concentrations of gamma-tocopherol had the lowest risk of developing prostate cancer.

My advice, then, is that if price and convenience are important issues, by all means buy the synthetic. If you feel that natural is the way to go, try to find a supplement that contains mixed tocopherols.

DEAR DR. BLONZ: I believe I heard at some point in my schooling that rinsing and draining canned vegetables reduces their sodium content by as much as 25 percent to 30 percent. I have searched through everything I have (old textbooks, lecture notes, etc.) and cannot find a single reference. Do you know how much the sodium content is reduced when canned vegetables are rinsed? Are you aware of any research articles on the subject? -- K.L., Jordan, Minn.

Dear J.L.: Salt, or sodium chloride, dissolves easily in water, so rinsing canned vegetables and beans will certainly reduce salt (sodium) content. As for the exact formula or percent reduction for a particular food, it depends on total sodium in the food, the amount of added salt and the volume of water exchanged. There is no specific data that I am aware of that works for all foods. A reasonable way of expressing it is to say that rinsing canned vegetables can cut sodium content by up to 40 percent. I hope this helps.



JWR contributor Ed Blonz, Ph.D., is a nutrition scientist and author of Power Nutrition and the "Your Personal Nutritionist" book series. Send questions to him by clicking here.

Up

03/12/02: Don't sweat the timing; bilberry and macular degeneration
03/05/02: Stay away from the creamers
02/26/02: Tomato effects on men; impact of taking all of those tablets
02/19/02: Is decaf dangerous?
02/12/02: Do veggies prevent mineral absorption?
02/05/02: Incompatibility problems between calcium and vitamin C; Can supplements prevent blindness?
01/29/02: What's wrong with the meat?; Does tuna packed in water still have high levels of omega-3?; Avoid "fractionated vegetable oils?"
01/22/02: Is all soy milk created equal?; foods containing magnesium; why do vitamins expire?
01/15/02: Three cheers for chocolate?
01/08/02: Making sense of labels
01/03/02: "Thermogenic" weight loss
12/26/01: What's up with ephedra?
12/18/01: Is new supplement a scam?

© 2002, NEA