Jewish World Review Oct. 19, 2004 / 4 Mar-Cheshvan, 5765
Edward I. Koch
Johns' disgraceful behavior has sealed their fate
Disgraceful attempts by John Edwards and John Kerry to exploit for political purposes the sexual orientation of Mary Cheney, daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney, ended the possibility of their winning the election.
Adam Nagourney of The New York Times, summed up the feelings of many, when he wrote, "Amid signs of Democratic concern, Mr. Kerry's advisers acknowledged Sunday that some voters perceived Mr. Kerry's remark [that Mary Cheney is a lesbian] as an invasion of Ms. Cheney's privacy, a gratuitous personal insult, or a crass political calculation by which Mr. Kerry was trying to drive a wedge between Mr. Cheney and conservatives unaware that his daughter was gay."
Defenders of Kerry and Edwards protest that Mary Cheney was already out and was even publicly described by her father as gay. But that is not the issue. Kerry and Edwards did the inexcusable: they tried to use the child of an opposing candidate for political purposes. Mary Cheney lives her life with a female partner. She has displayed a desire to lead that life privately, never granting interviews and remaining as anonymous as she can. She did not accompany her parents to the stage at Madison Square Garden when the Cheney and Bush families accepted the Republican Party's nomination, while the President's daughters did.
Edwards' apologists say that the Vice President thanked him for his comment during the debate. Let's see exactly what Edwards said and what Dick Cheney said in response. Edwards said, "I think the vice president and his wife love their daughter. I think they love her very much. And you can't have anything but respect for the fact that they're willing to talk about the fact that they have a gay daughter." Cheney's response: "Well, Gwen [Ifill], let me simply thank the senator for the kind words he said about my family and our daughter. I appreciate that very much." Gwen Ifill: "That's it?" Dick Cheney: "That's it." Not exactly a happy response. Cheney said the bare minimum consciously trying to prevent the debate from deteriorating into an angry episode.
During the third Bush-Kerry debate, moderator Bob Schieffer, asked first of President Bush, "Do you believe homosexuality is a choice?" The President responded, "You know, Bob, I don't know. I just don't know." Kerry responded, "We're all God's children, Bob. And I think if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who is a lesbian, she would tell you that she's being who she was; she's being who she was born as. I think you talk to anybody, it's not a choice."
After the debate, Lynn Cheney expressed what was clearly her parents' anger at Kerry for having used their daughter as a case study before millions of strangers. She said, "I am speaking as a mom and a pretty indignant mom. This is not a good man. What a cheap and tawdry political trick." Dick Cheney followed with, "You saw a man who will say and do anything in order to get elected. And I am not just speaking as a father here, although I am a pretty angry father." Mary's sister, Liz Cheney, said, "It was a very offensive thing for him to do."
How would Kerry know what is in Mary Cheney's mind? Had he ever discussed the subject with her? Doubtful. Why introduce her into the debate? The comment later by Kerry's campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill, added fuel to the fire by revealing the real purpose of the Kerry-Edwards comments. Cahill said: "There are a lot of questions here about gay marriage and she is someone who's a major figure in the campaign. I think it's fair game." Cahill's remarks undoubtedly reflect the real attitude of the Kerry campaign.
Mary Cheney's life is not "fair game" in any sense. Ms. Cheney is trying to lead a private life, particularly as it relates to her sexual orientation. She does not appear ashamed of her lifestyle, nor are her loving parents ashamed of her, notwithstanding the comments by John Edwards' wife Elizabeth, who said, "It makes me really sad that that's Lynne's response. I think that indicates a certain degree of shame with the respect to her daughter's sexual preferences."
What an outrage! What would have happened four years ago if, in Cheney's first vice presidential debate, he had exclaimed, "Isn't it wonderful that in our country we have reached the point where a Jew, Senator Joe Lieberman, could be a heartbeat away from the presidency?" What if Ronald Reagan in the course of his debate with Jimmy Carter had said, "It is just wonderful how Jimmy Carter defends his alcoholic brother Billy from those who criticize his antics?"
What if George W. Bush in debate said, "The best examples of corporate greed are the tax avoidances used by John Kerry's wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, already one of the richest women in the U.S.; and how wonderful that an 'African American' (which she has called herself) could have climbed so high. Only in America."
None of these remarks nor the shameless use of Mary Cheney for political purposes could pass the Kerry "global test," which we used to call the "nose test." Instead of a forthright apology, he defended his remarks, saying, "I love my daughters. They love their daughter. I was trying to say something positive about the way strong families deal with this issue."
Heretofore I said Bush's margin of victory would be 8 points. I'm raising it to 10 points. In the hearts and minds of the American voter, character and lack thereof still count.
Every weekday JewishWorldReview.com publishes what many in Washington
and in the media consider "must reading." Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Edward I. Koch, the former mayor of New York, can be heard on Bloomberg Radio (WBBR 1130 AM) every Sunday from 9-10 am . Comment by clicking here.
09/29/04: Assessing which candidate terrorists would prefer is well within the bounds of political discourse
09/27/04: Why is the NYTimes ignoring the religious element of Islamics' terrorism?
09/09/04: Muslim terrorists are victims: The view from NYTimes Land
08/18/04: Anti-Bush demonstrators know they can help re-elect prez
08/12/04: I've been branded a turncoat
07/28/04: If everyone is deemed responsible, no one is responsible
07/20/04: Why Bush must win
07/14/04: The crass class
06/29/04: Moore is an irresponsible propagandist who would have denounced WW II, too
06/16/04: Behind every hero …
06/08/04: Reagan's afterlife on Earth
05/19/04: We should not be pleading with the U.N. for help we should be demanding it
05/12/04: Abu Ghraib will go away but Rummy and Bush shouldn't
04/20/04: Freedom of … what?
03/03/04: Wake-up call: Prez will be defeated if he doesn't take action to stop other dangerous attack
03/12/04: Yes, Jews do engage in anti-Semitic behavior
02/04/04: History will judge Bush favorably
01/28/04: Why the President was justified David Kay or not
01/15/04: It is not compassionate or intelligent to open our borders to all
12/24/03: Why I'm voting for Bush
11/26/03: Appeasement only whets the appetite of aggressors
11/06/03: Putin's prosecution of the oligarchs can teach a powerful lesson about anti-Semitism
07/30/03: As the world churns
07/23/03: America not so different than Russia in pursuing white collar criminals
07/16/03: Dems, media are making an unforgivable mistake
06/18/03: Keep American troops out of Israel
05/22/03: It's lots of fun to remain relevant
05/14/03: Living up to their mascot's image? Dems attacks on prez are backfiring
05/07/03: Wall Street settlement was not justice
04/16/03: The doves were proven wrong. Instead of conceding defeat, they are throwing another political tantrum
04/09/03: As the world churns
04/03/03: Gulf War II: The misleading media does it again
03/18/03: Have the courage to admit it, Pat: You're a classic anti-Semite who gives conservatives a bad name
03/12/03: "There they go again"? Not quite!
03/05/03: Making the case for war on British TV left some panelists stunned
02/20/03: Death penalty=racism? Don't confuse them with the facts
02/12/03: History is now repeating itself --- why don't the American bashers grasp it?
02/05/03: As the world turns
01/30/03: Why are sports exempt from racial diversity and universities encouraged to engage in racial preferences over individual academic achievement?
01/23/03: We absolutely can't back down
11/13/02: President blunted the Ted Kennedys of Democrat party --- good for him!
10/23/02: New Jersey's bigot laureate is no private citizen and his 'defenses' are idiotic
10/01/02: Congress is not doing its job
09/26/02: Confronting pathetic Americans in a post 9-11 world
09/19/02: Don't be fooled by Saddam
09/05/02: Necessary or not, getting congressional approval for war is common-sense
08/28/02: In defense of terrorism
08/22/02: Saddam Hussein is extremely popular in "Arab street," so why attack him?
08/15/02: My potpourri
08/09/02: Traitors: Journalistic and 'patriotic'
07/31/02: Euros should spend their time analyzing their own country's wartime actions
07/25/02: I may know next to nothing about the stock market, but I'm not getting out
07/18/02: Dems should stop trying to 'Whitewater' the President
07/11/02: Real Americans and the Islamic threat
© 2002, Edward I. Koch