Jewish World Review Sept. 22, 2003 / 25 Elul, 5763
A tale of two spams
Those of you who are not "computer savvy" may wonder why so many people whine
about spam, a delicious luncheon meat-like substance that goes wonderfully with
white bread and mayonnaise.
Well, it turns out there are two kinds of spam. One is the aforementioned budget
entrée whereas the other is an unsolicited e-mail advertisement inviting you to
increase your penis size 1 to 3 inches.
(Please take care to memorize the distinction. You would not want to attend a conference of Internet marketers and shout
"I'd like some spam, please!" unless you want some lead weights clamped to a very personal and sensitive part of your
The problem with spam is that there is way too much of it. The American economy is struggling mainly because employees
spend 7 1/2 hours of every working day sifting through Internet ads. It is easy to become simultaneously angry and
despondent after reading the 500th invitation to increase your penis size, particularly if you happen to be a woman.
Which is why I was not particularly surprised to read that a survey of 28,000 e-mail readers found that 75 percent believe
that spammers should have a boat anchor chained to their appendage and then be dumped overboard into a school of hungry
sharks with a taste for fatty sandwich meat.
Actually, the respondents didn't say anything of the sort, probably because that particular option was thoughtlessly omitted
from the questionnaire. What the survey revealed was that 3 out of 4 respondents found it less aggravating to clean a toilet
than to wade through the junk messages in their e-mail. I personally found this response rather perplexing. When I'm wading
through my junk e-mail, I'm thinking of large caliber weapons, not brushes and cleanser.
I suppose people link junk mail with housework because both are unpleasant, but the connection between spam and toilets
still strikes me as odd, unless the thought of plowing through hundreds of annoying ads makes you contemplate the most
convenient means of drowning yourself.
Anyway, among the other survey results:
- A third said spammers should be fined. (Given the nature of most of their ads, I would suggest a "stiff" fine.)
- One in five said spammers should be deluged with junk mail at their own homes. (Dave Barry made headlines recently by
suggesting in a column that people place a cheerful call to the telemarketers' headquarters, preferably at dinnertime or while
they are engaged in an act of personal hygiene. The telemarketers wished to express their displeasure with this stunt, but they
were too busy answering the phone.)
- One in six said spammers should have their business licenses revoked, which I found startling since I had no idea there were
actual licenses making it legal for you to market penis extenders.
- One in 12 thought spammers should be given jail time, preferably in a cell with an aggressive fellow who had derived huge
benefit from one of the spammer's ads, if you catch my drift. (I am possibly making that last part up.)
- But, perhaps most shocking of all, 25 percent of respondents believed that spammers should not be punished at all because
they are simply doing their job.
By that same logic, I suppose we should not punish hired assassins because they, too, are simply doing their job.
And, besides, unless you are the one being assassinated, they are far less annoying.
Appreciate this column? Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor David Grimes is a columnist for The Sarasota Herald Tribune. Comment by clicking here.
09/16/03: Librarian action figure will be taking no guff
09/10/03: Slackers need to remain invisible
09/02/03: No fun in the summertime
08/26/03: The algebra of love
08/11/03: Journey to the center of the pavement cracks
08/06/03: Word dominance by U.S. appears a fait accompli
07/28/03: Ads that are hard to swallow
07/09/03: Keep cows out of the classroom
07/03/03: Little-appreciated facts about unshaven men
06/24/03: Brother, can you paradigm?
06/18/03: Cats, TV not a good mix
06/10/03: In defense of grumpiness
06/04/03: Do we really need keyboards in our Port-A-Johns?
05/29/03: Always a dull men's moment
05/21/03: Bad PC hygiene leads to bugs
05/12/03:Army mops up; Tony Blair doesn't
05/06/03: Grill a hamburger for PETA
05/01/03: Exams spice history
04/23/03: Too much money? Tax me more!
04/14/03: When good gourds go bad
04/11/03: One fish-tale that isn't --- and that's no lie!
04/02/03: Do you really want to know what your dog's thinking?
03/26/03: Pajamas make high school less stressful
03/21/03: It's time to be nice to the French
03/03/03: The ultimate clean and constructive sport
02/12/03: Get a bang out of cleaning with cruise vacuum
02/06/03: Voluntary kindness? Not likely
01/28/03: Signs our economy is on upswing
01/22/03: There may be cash in your old underwear
01/15/03: Banish these words, now more than ever
01/07/03: Coughing as an art form
12/24/02: Parents shell out for missed homework
12/17/02: French government says no to @ symbol
12/11/02: A latecomer joins fellowship of the DVD
12/02/02: Don't worry, be fat, unfit and really happy
11/18/02: Intrigued by a German invention that could get teens out of bed before the crack of noon
11/06/02: A noose by any other name ...
10/29/02: Iranian dogs on notice
10/22/02: Talk about a job that stinks --- literally!
10/15/02: The official world's funniest joke
10/02/02: Japanese turn eyes to computer haikus
09/27/02: Oh, no! Bosses want to know what's on your mind
09/24/02: An airbag, humanity's salvation?
09/17/02: DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME!
09/06/02: Come listen to a story about a man named ... Bill
09/03/02: You're not in preschool anymore!
08/30/02: A charming idea from a brutal, whacked-out, megalomaniacal dictator-for-life
08/26/02: Blubber water? How to put on the pounds by gulping H20
08/21/02: The latest evidence that Mother Nature is out to kill us
08/13/02: Computers, airplanes and Canada don't mix
08/06/02: The sky's not falling? Dang it!
08/02/02: Some fond memories of worst TV shows
07/30/02: Pay my credit-card bill, please?
07/25/02: Something to celebrate
07/22/02: Baseball needs to ban the fans
07/16/02: Hasbro should consider new inaction figure
07/11/02: Decline in trash-talking is harming our mental health? Well, #@%&!
07/08/02 Americans retain right to fork tongues
07/01/02 These laws were made to be broken
06/18/02 Watching enough commercials?
06/03/02 Throwing your vote to the dogs
Hey, Mom, could you spare a dime?: Parents' obligations unending
© 2002, Sarasota Herald Tribune