Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review August 13, 2003 / 15 Menachem-Av, 5763

Amitai Etzioni

Amitai Etzioni
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Stop obsessing over Saddam


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | For nationalistic and religious reasons, most Iraqis will ... insist on running their country, their way — even if we erase Saddam from their dinars, topple all of his statues and exhibit his body on television.

Bernard Trainor, a retired Marine Corps general and military analyst, called the deaths of Saddam Hussein's sons Uday and Qusay "a tremendous blow to the Baathist regime and a real boon for those Iraqis seeking a Saddam-free future.

"This is a major event that can only be topped by getting Saddam himself," Trainor said shortly after their demise last month.

The Christian Science Monitor quoted unnamed U.S. officials who "believe that capturing or killing Hussein is vital to quelling the guerrilla-style campaign" against U.S. forces. And even as keen an observer as Martha Raddatz of ABC News holds that if we caught Saddam, it would help enormously.

So one would assume that if the U.S. captured Saddam during the next few days it would have a grand effect on the situation in Iraq and the Middle East in general.

Don't hold your breath. We have a tendency to believe that we can change societies by changing leaders; actually, we cannot. That's because, as a rule, major social forces are at work. They cannot be redirected overnight just because we finally take care of Saddam and his sons. Or, for that matter, if we finally got rid of Osama bin Laden.

For one thing, Iraqis are very nationalistic. They have a long history of suffering from — and fighting — foreign occupiers. The British after World War I were the last foreign power to occupy the country. Although nationalism then was much less rampant than it is today, the Iraqis fought the British tooth-and-nail, causing them tens of thousands of casualties.

Donate to JWR

These days, many Iraqis are relieved that the United States has removed Saddam from power. But they also do not want to replace Saddam's regime with one imposed by foreigners. Iraqis have made clear that they want to use the freedom the American military has granted them — to form their own government.

Typically, Fawzi Shafi, the editor of a new weekly Iraqi newspaper who welcomed the removal of Saddam from power, has become an opponent of the United States since the end of the war, calling the U.S. Army "an offensive occupier." Does anybody believe that such sentiments will be assuaged because Saddam is killed or captured and tried?

Another reason Saddam's capture won't immediately change things is that about 60% of all Iraqis are Shiites. The overwhelming majority of them want a strict Islamic republic similar to Iran's. They abhor American culture, which they consider secular, hedonistic and lascivious. They do not want women out in public without their heads covered. They already have bombed several stores that were selling alcohol. Most importantly, several Shiite leaders have been calling on their followers to form an army to drive U.S. forces out of their holy cities.

Will the Shiites embrace a secular society because Saddam is finally out of the picture?

The United States is making the same mistake by attributing so much significance to catching bin Laden. Al-Qaeda is a loose network of largely independent groups. Their motives are a mix of religious fanaticism and macho adventurism. The future of these groups of terrorists will be determined much more by our learning about the people involved, their cultures and the reasons for their hatred toward us and by working with them as well as our own special forces rather than by eliminating one leader.

Indeed, one reason the United States has such great difficulties in Afghanistan is that it is fostering a national leader, Hamid Karzai, rather than working with the local warlords, who are the natural heads of the various ethnic groups that make up that society.

American culture is drenched in psychological terms, which lead us to personalize social forces and international relations. As a nation, we pay too much attention to which foreign leaders our president is chummy with and which he dislikes. For example, it is foolish to believe that if President Bush and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder had just got along better, the Germans would not have objected so strongly to our intervention in Iraq.

I am not claiming that catching Saddam and making changes in the leadership won't have any impact. Some of Saddam's followers may despair. More people will be willing to risk cooperating with us.

There might even be a lull in the guerrilla attacks. But in the longer run, the Iraqis want us out, and they reject the largely imported leaders we are imposing on them. For nationalistic and religious reasons, most Iraqis will not cooperate with us and will continue to insist on running their country, their way — even if we erase Saddam from their dinars, topple all of his statues and exhibit his body on television, as we did with his sons.

Once we stop personalizing the news, we'll be ready to realize that the best way for the United States to proceed is not to stand in the way of major social forces. In Iraq, that means that the U.S. should let the secular and religious Iraqis confront each other as they grope to find a way to form a joint government. Let them gradually take responsibility for running water, electricity and safety in the streets.

Saddam or no Saddam, they want to run their own country, something we surely can appreciate once we stop focusing on the personalities involved.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.


JWR contributor Amitai Etzioni, of George Washington University, is the author of, most recently, "My Brother's Keeper: A Memoir and a Message", from where this essay was adapted. Comment by clicking here.

07/31/03: We need to trust our government
06/17/03: Don't Separate Mosque and State: U.S. should stop trying to export its secular system to Iraq
05/15/03: Patriot Act is needed, but so are revisions
05/06/03: Aliens are not part of the club yet
02/13/03: To NASA: Bring in the drones
01/08/03: Values, not pay, provide best incentive to donate organs
12/12/02: Iran may present greater threat than Iraq
11/12/02: Killing Christians: The underreported story of Islamist violence around the world
10/16/02: Seeking middle ground on privacy vs. security
10/08/02: "In and out"
09/24/02: Treat driver's licenses as what they are: Domestic passports
08/27/02: How democracy is preserved
08/21/02: Why Martha 'needs' more
07/12/02: I was once a member of a "terrorist" group, show no mercy on civilian terrorists
03/31/02: Scandals will end when penalties fit crimes
02/03/02: A former White House staffer's plea to Congress: A presidency needs privacy
01/03/02: One nation, after all
12/27/01: Where children must write their PARENTS notes
12/20/01: American extremists
12/13/01: Homeland defense is best option for volunteerism
11/11/01: Can we force democracy on the Afghans?
11/08/01: How not to win the war
10/01/01: Problems with the new antiterrorist agenda is not that it is too grand, but that it is not grand enough
09/21/01: Either U.S. forces should strike back hard or we'll lose our freedoms
09/05/01: Communities, not the president, must enact morality
08/23/01: Economists fail as forecasters
08/09/01: Live from Washington it's . "Everyone's a Criminal"
07/27/01: Condit case illustrates the need to rein in fast-talking lawyers playing verbal acrobatics with the truth
08/01/01: Shouting 'Big Brother' in a crowded society


© 2002, The Weekly Standard, from where this piece was reprinted