Jewish World Review March 31, 2004 / 8 Nissan, 5764
Congress must come to terms ... ten minutes with Rep. Dick Armey
Congressman Dick Armey of Texas played a major role in the "Republican Revolution" of 1994 that gave his party control of the House of Representatives for the first time in four decades.
The former House Majority Leader, who retired in 2002, was a powerful force for limited government, lower taxes, fiscal responsibility and more individual freedom for 18 years. Known for his bipartisanship and his principles, the economics professor crafted legislation that closed 100 obsolete military bases, worked hard to support NAFTA, and was the chief author of the Contract With America.
Armey is now co-chairman of Citizens for a Sound Economy (cse.org), a Washington-based, grass-roots citizens group in favor of limited government and free markets that works for a flat tax, Social Security reform and school choice. I talked to him by cell phone on Thursday from Denton County, Texas, near Dallas:
Q: We've got unfunded liabilities for Social Security and Medicare totaling $72 trillion. We've got deficits, increased federal spending. Are you depressed?
A: No, I'm not. Medicare probably depresses me more than Social Security. We know how we can fix Social Security. We can turn Social Security into good news with personal retirement accounts. While Medicare still is a horrible nightmare, at least we can fix Social Security.
On the question of deficits and the size of the budget, sooner or later Congress is going to have to come to terms with cutting spending and reviewing programs and seeing what it can eliminate.
Q: Do Republicans have the will to do this? Is this something they just can't do right now, or is it something they've lost the will to do?
A: Well, the biggest problem we have is that even with the Republican majority, and even when I was there with our Republican majority right after the "Revolution of '94," you still always have a majority of Congress that wants to spend more money. That pretty well includes all of the Senate, Republican moderates in the House, all appropriators and probably all Democrats.
It took an extremely rigorous and tough leadership hand to hold down spending for the first years, but after 9/11, the ethic of controlling spending just was lost. It has to be reclaimed.
Q: When you first ran for Congress, what were your personal goals?
A: My personal goals were to cut the size of government, fix the tax system, fix the tort laws and reduce government regulation of the private sector of the economy.
Q: Do you feel that you achieved enough of them, any of them, all of them?
A: No. I think my personal accomplishments in Congress all look in that direction, but we've not done what we should be doing as a national government. We've still moved in essentially the same direction that the liberals were moving us into in the Great Society and the years beyond.
We've probably done a little bit better than Ronald Reagan was able to do as Republican president with a Democrat Congress, but we're nowhere near what we need to do. We should have a simple, decent, honest retirement system and tax system and a much smaller government. There's an enormous amount of work left to be done.
Politics vs. policy
Q: When you see now what the Bush administration is doing with the deficits and prescription drug plan, are you optimistic that the administration will be able to right itself?
A: I think that President Bush, particularly with Medicare prescription drugs, is letting the political people define policy objectives. I said at that time, and I say now, that I think it is going to be a wrong decision, both with respect to politics and policy. The president is going to get a political negative out of it, and an enormous policy negative.
But I do believe that the president has the correct instincts. Once he is re-elected and beyond politics, and never having to face another election in his life, I'm optimistic that he will show the kind of creative, disciplined leadership that we have a right to expect from him.
Q: What about his foreign policy and social policy? Are you critical of the administration on anything?
A: Again, I'm proud that when we suffered the 9/11 attack, he stepped right up and said, "We're going to go get these guys," and said to the world, "You can come along or not, but we're going after them." I think that's what we had to do.
I always had my own doubts and reservations about the war against Iraq, and yet you can't escape being optimistic that you've rid the world of a tyrant like Saddam Hussein. I've got mixed emotions on that.
On the social policy, I think he's been very good on the real issues of the heart things like right to life and protecting our right to practice our Christian faith or any faith in this country.
I've been a little bit surprised at some of the social policy moves he's made, most notably, continuing AmeriCorp, which is a dumb idea, and his desire to patronize the arts with the taxpayers' money. Both of these baffle me. They're not the acts of a good conservative.
Q: What are the most important and most realistic goals of the Citizens for a Sound Economy?
A: I think you always have to put within the context of the day you're working on it. Today, and for the next few years, the most imperative thing we've got to do is get private retirement accounts and to replace this Social Security system that is headed for the rocks.
Social Security, if we leave it alone, will be greatest financial disaster in the history of the world. Private retirement accounts will not only avoid that disaster, but give everyone in America the chance to own a part of this great country and to manage their own retirement security. That's our first priority.
Toomey vs. Specter
Q: You probably know Congressman Pat Toomey pretty well?
A: Yes, I do. I know him extremely well.
Q: As you know he's challenging Sen. Arlen Specter in a primary next month. We support Toomey, editorially. We find it troubling that the GOP hierarchy is really going all out for Specter. The president stuck up for him. Rick Santorum did an ad for Specter.
A: Yeah, the Toomey-Specter race is a very good illustration of a distinction that I don't think we often make, which is a distinction between the party regulars and the conservative base. Toomey is the candidate of the conservative base, and people like myself appreciate him frankly, we cherish him because he is so much not an establishment member of Congress but a man of creative thinking and assertive work skills who really is trying to make this government smaller and more effective.
Specter is an establishment guy, and the party faithful is going to support Specter principally because he's the guy that's in. But if you want the government to change direction, then you've got to be willing to change the personnel in the government.
Q: Any predictions?
A: Well, Toomey is a hard campaigner, and he'll probably get a lot of good, grass-roots work. Specter will have all the advantages of the incumbent and the establishment. My guiding light has always been since my own race in 1984 that "Hard work beats Daddy's money," and that could be what happens in this race.
Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
JWR contributor Bill Steigerwald is an associate editor and columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Comment by clicking here.
03/22/04: How to win the terror war ... 10 minutes with terrorism expert Steven Emerson
03/16/04: Religion, spiritual freedom & Ronald Reagan … 10 minutes with author Paul Kengor
03/10/04: America's materialism keeps world in tune
02/24/04: Our new epoch in history ... 10 minutes with philosopher/political thinker/novelist Lee Harris
02/20/04: Vanity Fair, SI sink lower than ever
02/13/04: A rare libertarian among Big Media liberals up close and personal with John Stossel
02/10/04: Young innovators changing the rules
02/03/04: Now, the election fun begins … 10 minutes with Charlie Cook
01/30/04: Dem Dems
01/16/04: Caucuses bore you? You're not alone
01/14/04: Paradise lost? Ten minutes with … Victor Davis Hanson
01/09/04: Howard Dean week?
12/26/03: How is the magazine sector doing?
12/17/03: 10 minutes with Thomas Sowell
12/15/03: Journalism 'watchdog' displays bad reporting
12/09/03: Book lovers are losing a good read
12/05/03: 'South Park' has unlikely audience tuning in
12/03/03: An odd lot of 35 'heroes'
11/24/03: 'We'll learn the truth someday' … 10 minutes with JFK expert Cyril Wecht
11/18/03: Exposer of the idiocy of bureaucracy and the threat to individual freedom posed by government … Ten minutes with author James Bovard
11/14/03: Two stories examine Wal-Mart's domination
11/07/03: The real Rumsfeld … 10 minutes with author Midge Decter
11/05/03: Lights! Camera! Fudge!?
10/31/03: The straight dope on hate, drugs, Jon Stewart
10/24/03: See what federal $$$ does?
10/21/03: Esquire recalls its glory days
10/14/03: A 784-page biography hatchet job that only Clinton-haters will love published by Random House? Ten minutes with Nigel Hamilton
10/10/03: Bush adviser girds for a tough fight ... 10 minutes with Mary Matalin
10/07/03: Forbes gives advice on making rich list
09/30/03: A 20th Century American tour
09/26/03: Reagan's life in letters
09/24/03: Bin Laden and Boy Bill
09/22/03: Dennis Miller makes funny business of politics
09/16/03: Famous 'bad girls' clear the air
09/12/03: Ben Stein gets serious: Davis is a 'thug in a gray flannel suit'
09/09/03: Smart(-Alecky) mag's very different 'swimsuit issue'; Murdoch might not be as bad as we thought
09/02/03: Ex-teacher lambastes our schools
08/25/03: Vanity Fair strives to be more than glamorous
07/22/03: Title IX's original intent … Ten minutes with Eric Pearson
07/11/03: Vanity Fair dishes it out on JFK Jr., N.Y. Times
07/09/03: Why Ben Franklin should be the "Father of Our Country" ... 10 minutes with Walter Isaacson
07/07/03: Honoring nation's first celebrity superstar
06/27/03: Reader's Digest can't help but act its age
06/24/03: Dick Morris, consultant for hire, reveals the inside story
06/20/03: Move over, Hillary. Here comes a better work of fiction
06/10/03: Publications take us away from Middle East
06/03/03: Dear graduates: Work for freedom … 10 minutes with Penn Jillette
05/30/03: National Geographic goes to the top of the world
05/23/03: Editors dabble in history, fiction
05/16/03: The Old Grim Lady gets covered
05/09/03: Political parties fighting over Iraq's wreckage
05/07/03: 10 minutes with a big-city Dem mayor who loathes budget deficits, the federal highway program, taxpayer-funded sports stadiums and the meddling (and aid money) of Washington
05/02/03: Are you sufficiently terrified?
04/29/03: Finally, a president defending American principles in the Middle East ... 10 minutes with Alexander Haig
04/25/03: Newsweeklies starting to lose interest in Iraq war
04/21/03: There's bias, and then there's bias
04/11/03: Planning future of Iraq, world
04/04/03: Newsweeklies come back with graphic look at war
03/28/03: Newsweeklies try to keep up with TV war coverage
03/26/03: Wen Ho Lee whistle-blower says beware of China
03/21/03: America's ready for war ... and peace
03/18/03: Baseball limping, not dead … 10 minutes with author Andrew Zimbalist
03/14/03: Vanity Fair gets us ready for month's big event
03/11/03: A road map for Iraq's liberation devised by James Madison? … 10 minutes with James S. Robbins
03/06/03: Iraq war will come and go before we know it
02/28/03: America takes time out for swimsuits
02/26/03: 'We shall be seen as liberators' .... 10 minutes with noted Brit commentator David Pryce-Jones
02/21/03: Terrorism one of many losing battles
02/14/03: Editors planning for the day after Gulf War II
02/12/03: The 'religiosity' of Ronald Reagan … 10 minutes with author Paul Kengor
02/10/03: Should the shuttle crash be the end of NASA?
02/06/03: Dear Joan ...
01/31/03: Newsweek, Nation ponder pros, cons of Gulf War II
01/24/03: 'Original' ideas follow New Deal philosophy
01/22/03: When handicapping 2004, watch the economy: Ten minutes with … Charlie Cook
01/17/03: New Republic fans hatred for SUVs
01/14/03: 10 minutes with Santorum on ... taxes, steel and Lott
01/10/03: Newsweeklies move on to latest menace
01/07/03: The best of the Q&As
12/30/02: Rosie's demise tops list of 2002 highlights
12/23/02: GOP must stick to its principles: 10 questions for ... Bill Kristol
12/20/02: Lott fiasco uncovers bigger problem
12/18/02: Free markets king in Sweden, at least for a day: Ten minutes with …. Donald Boudreaux
12/13/02: Corruption of Indian casinos no surprise
12/06/02: Giving credit to young philanthropists
12/02/02: Ten minutes with …. Chris Matthews
11/26/02: It's critical to memorialize communism's victims: 10 minutes with … Lee Edwards
11/22/02: JFK's secret health woes are revealed
11/19/02: It's best to contain Saddam: Ten minutes with … Col. David Hackworth
11/15/02: Brushing up on the affairs of a wild world
11/12/02: Make Dems filibuster … 10 minutes with … Robert L. Bartley
11/08/02: National Geographic: Urban overpopulation is good
11/05/02: The bloody consequences of a broken INS: Ten minutes with … Michelle Malkin
11/01/02: Going to pot; thank heaven for media overkill
10/29/02: It's all about federalism: Ten minutes with … Jonah Goldberg
10/25/02: Frank Sinatra, Kurt Cobain, Mad Magazine will never die
10/22/02: Here's why Orwell matters: Ten minutes with … Christopher Hitchens
10/18/02: The sniper knocks Iraq off the covers
10/15/02: Iraq, oil and war: 10 minutes with ... economist/historian Daniel Yergin
10/11/02: England's gun-control experiment has backfired
10/04/02: Buchanan the media baron?
09/27/02: Analyzing Esquire, GQ is not for the squeamish
09/20/02: CEOs: The rise and fall of American heroes
09/13/02: Skeptics remind U.S. to calm down
09/10/02: 'A failure to recognize a failure': 15 minutes with ... Bill Gertz
09/06/02: Rating the 9-11 mags
08/30/02: Bad trains, bad planes, and bad automobiles
08/28/02: Baseball, broken, can be fixed: 15 minutes with George Will
08/16/02: 9-11 overload has already begun
08/13/02: Tell us what you really think, Ann Coulter
08/09/02: A funny take on a new kind of suburb
08/02/02: It's not the humidity, it's the (media) heat wave; the death of American cities
07/12/02: Colombia's drug lords are all business
07/09/02: If capitalism is 'soulless' then show me something better: 10 minutes with … Alan Reynolds
06/25/02: Origins of a scandal: 10 minutes with … Michael Rose
06/21/02: 9/11 report unearths good, bad and ugly
06/18/02: The FBI is rebounding … 10 Minutes with Ronald Kessler
06/14/02: U.S. News opens closet of Secret Service
06/11/02: 10 minutes with … William Lind: Can America survive in this 'fourth-generation' world?
06/07/02: America, warts and all
05/30/02: FBI saga gets more depressing
05/13/02: The magazine industry's annual exercise in self-puffery
04/30/02: 10 Minutes with ... The New York Sun's Seth Lipsky
04/26/02: Will the American Taliban go free?
04/23/02: 10 minutes with ... Dinesh D'Souza
04/19/02: Saddam starting to show his age
04/12/02: Newsweek puts suicide bombing in perspective
04/09/02: How polls distort the news, change the outcome of elections and encourage legislation that undermines the foundations of the republic
04/05/02: Looking into the state of American greatness
03/25/02: The American President and the Peruvian Shoeshine Boys
03/22/02: Troublemaking intellectual puts Churchill in spotlight
03/20/02: 10 minutes with ... Bill Bennett
03/18/02: Suddenly, it's cool again to be a man
03/12/02: 10 minutes with … Ken Adelman
03/08/02: TIME asks the nation a scary question
03/05/02: 10 minutes with ... Rich Lowry
02/26/02: 10 minutes with ... Tony Snow
02/12/02: Has Soldier of Fortune gone soft?
© 2002, Bill Steigerwald