Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Oct. 10, 2003 / 14 Tishrei, 5764

Bill Steigerwald

Bill Steigerwald
JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
James Glassman
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
Michelle Malkin
Jackie Mason
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports


Bush adviser girds for a tough fight ... 10 minutes with Mary Matalin


http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Mary Matalin -- the nonsense-free Republican operative, White House strategist, TV commentator and now co-star of HBO's new "K Street" political reality show -- has been at the epicenter of big-time presidential politics for more than 20 years.

Matalin, who's visiting Pittsburgh next week to deliver a speech and stump for a local judicial candidate, has worked in six presidential elections, was President George Bush's campaign manager in 1992 and recently left her dual-job as assistant to George W. Bush and counselor to Vice President Dick Cheney.

A former co-host of CNN's "Crossfire," she is married to her political opposite and frequent TV-debate mate, Democrat operative James Carville. She is the author of several books, including the best-selling "All's Fair: Love, War, and Running for President," written with Carville.

I talked with her by telephone Thursday:

Q: So what is your main career these days -- are you a star of "K Street," a speaker, a mother?

A: My main career and my career of choice is mothering. So all of my other assignments, except when I'm on the road, have to fit into a time frame where I can get my kids off to school in the morning and be there when they come home at night. So "K Street" is in there. Writing a book is in there. I'm still advising the White House. And I'm doing speaking.

Q: What's your take on the alleged leak by the White House that revealed the name of a CIA officer?

A: I don't have a take. The facts are not clear. It clearly looks a feeding frenzy, but what the actual facts are remain to be seen. I've been through feeding frenzies like this before, and the end product never looks like it starts out to be. Other than that, I wouldn't know. I wasn't there at the time.

Donate to JWR

Q: Who do you think is going to win in California?

A: If you go with the polls, I guess Arnold is going to.

Q: By the way, do you have any explanation for what happened to Arianna Huffington? She was once a conservative, almost a libertarian. She's at least 178 degrees from that.

A: I think she's a pretty classic publicity seeker. It's pretty hard to get attention in California as a conservative, so she went with the glamour crowd. When she was in Washington, I never took her as a serious conservative -- more like a party thrower. I don't think she's a figure in politics, period.

Q: What have you learned about politics, good and bad, during your recent stint in the White House?

A: I think that changing the tone of politics, which was very much a goal of the president's, is really like moving a huge steam ship. It's just hard to do. But the I think the country -- voters -- are ahead of the politicians, because when I was campaigning in the midterm elections, they don't want to hear it.

I guess there is an extreme wing in each party, but the bulk of at least the people I was campaigning for, and with, were about solutions. We have real-life problems today. We have an economy that's coming out of a recession. It was a bumpy recovery anyway, and then it got hit with unparalleled events -- an attack, a war, homeland security, a lot of expenses. And not to mention the terrorism itself.

I think people are not going to put up with a campaign of mudslinging and pettiness. They just really want to hear your grasp of the problem and your solution for it. I didn't learn that in the White House, I just think that's how it changed since 9/11.

Q: Is the Bush administration getting worried about the effect on the 2004 election?

A: I know the vice president and the president and the senior staff don't look at Iraq as "a political" issue. I know there is (laughs) ... there's just a detachment from what continues to be the reality of the war on terror and the reality of what's going on in Iraq and what's being reported on it.

Now this is not in any way meant to be media bashing, but perhaps to some extent we need to do a better job explaining. But every day the president, the vice president, the senior staff looks at the threat matrix and the kind of things that are still going on out there. So they start their day with a little bit different perspective and they come at it with the point of view that they've got a job to do -- which is to protect America.

And Iraq, being a critical part of that war on terror, needs to be stabilized and built to some sort of representative government. And everybody who goes over there, everybody, to a man -- congressmen of either party, reporters of all stripes -- comes back and says the same thing. A Democrat congressman did an op-ed in The Washington Post (on Wednesday) saying that what is happening on the ground versus what's being reported is an enormous disparity.

Q: Who does the Bush administration want to see win the 2004 nomination for the Democrats?

A: We get that question a lot. A., we're really not in the campaign mode yet. But, B., it doesn't really matter, because when you are an incumbent, you have to run on your record. And they're going to attack the record. They're all going to attack it from the same way.

Right now, it's a referendum and when it becomes a contest and a choice, then it will be our policies versus their policies. Whatever their policies are has yet to be revealed, because the Democrats are in the midst of an all-bash-Bush-all-the-time mode, which is how primaries work.

It seems to be more aggravated in this instance because their analysis is that Howard Dean surged ahead because he's the biggest Bush-basher. I think that's an incorrect analysis. I think Dean surged ahead because he feels and sounds more authentic, and since 9/11 people want authenticity in their public officials.

So it's less about what he's saying, because voters are wanting to judge the character, and the character definition, in my mind, in this cycle, has less to do with honor and integrity, which is always a piece of character, but has to do with having a very low b.s. component. I don't know how else to say it.

I think their Bush-bashing analysis is wrong ... . We have to get a candidate to know what the Democrat Party positions are. They are unclear at this point, and it really doesn't matter to us. This is a very divided country, a very polarized country, and we never expected that that wouldn't be the case come election time. We were always prepared to fight a tough race. I think whoever will come out of their primaries will be a formidable candidate. It's going to be tough race.

Enjoy this writer's work? Why not sign-up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.




JWR contributor Bill Steigerwald is an associate editor and columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Comment by clicking here.

10/07/03: Forbes gives advice on making rich list
09/30/03: A 20th Century American tour
09/26/03: Reagan's life in letters
09/24/03: Bin Laden and Boy Bill
09/22/03: Dennis Miller makes funny business of politics
09/16/03: Famous 'bad girls' clear the air
09/12/03: Ben Stein gets serious: Davis is a 'thug in a gray flannel suit'
09/09/03: Smart(-Alecky) mag's very different 'swimsuit issue'; Murdoch might not be as bad as we thought
09/02/03: Ex-teacher lambastes our schools
08/25/03: Vanity Fair strives to be more than glamorous
07/22/03: Title IX's original intent Ten minutes with Eric Pearson
07/11/03: Vanity Fair dishes it out on JFK Jr., N.Y. Times
07/09/03: Why Ben Franklin should be the "Father of Our Country" ... 10 minutes with Walter Isaacson
07/07/03: Honoring nation's first celebrity superstar
06/27/03: Reader's Digest can't help but act its age
06/24/03: Dick Morris, consultant for hire, reveals the inside story
06/20/03: Move over, Hillary. Here comes a better work of fiction
06/10/03: Publications take us away from Middle East
06/03/03: Dear graduates: Work for freedom 10 minutes with Penn Jillette
05/30/03: National Geographic goes to the top of the world
05/23/03: Editors dabble in history, fiction
05/16/03: The Old Grim Lady gets covered
05/09/03: Political parties fighting over Iraq's wreckage
05/07/03: 10 minutes with a big-city Dem mayor who loathes budget deficits, the federal highway program, taxpayer-funded sports stadiums and the meddling (and aid money) of Washington
05/02/03: Are you sufficiently terrified?
04/29/03: Finally, a president defending American principles in the Middle East ... 10 minutes with Alexander Haig
04/25/03: Newsweeklies starting to lose interest in Iraq war
04/21/03: There's bias, and then there's bias
04/11/03: Planning future of Iraq, world
04/04/03: Newsweeklies come back with graphic look at war
03/28/03: Newsweeklies try to keep up with TV war coverage
03/26/03: Wen Ho Lee whistle-blower says beware of China
03/21/03: America's ready for war ... and peace
03/18/03: Baseball limping, not dead 10 minutes with author Andrew Zimbalist
03/14/03: Vanity Fair gets us ready for month's big event
03/11/03: A road map for Iraq's liberation devised by James Madison? 10 minutes with James S. Robbins
03/06/03: Iraq war will come and go before we know it
02/28/03: America takes time out for swimsuits
02/26/03: 'We shall be seen as liberators' .... 10 minutes with noted Brit commentator David Pryce-Jones
02/21/03: Terrorism one of many losing battles
02/14/03: Editors planning for the day after Gulf War II
02/12/03: The 'religiosity' of Ronald Reagan 10 minutes with author Paul Kengor
02/10/03: Should the shuttle crash be the end of NASA?
02/06/03: Dear Joan ...
01/31/03: Newsweek, Nation ponder pros, cons of Gulf War II
01/24/03: 'Original' ideas follow New Deal philosophy
01/22/03: When handicapping 2004, watch the economy: Ten minutes with Charlie Cook
01/17/03: New Republic fans hatred for SUVs
01/14/03: 10 minutes with Santorum on ... taxes, steel and Lott
01/10/03: Newsweeklies move on to latest menace
01/07/03: The best of the Q&As
12/30/02: Rosie's demise tops list of 2002 highlights
12/23/02: GOP must stick to its principles: 10 questions for ... Bill Kristol
12/20/02: Lott fiasco uncovers bigger problem
12/18/02: Free markets king in Sweden, at least for a day: Ten minutes with . Donald Boudreaux
12/13/02: Corruption of Indian casinos no surprise
12/06/02: Giving credit to young philanthropists
12/02/02: Ten minutes with . Chris Matthews
11/26/02: It's critical to memorialize communism's victims: 10 minutes with Lee Edwards
11/22/02: JFK's secret health woes are revealed
11/19/02: “It's best to contain Saddam”: Ten minutes with Col. David Hackworth
11/15/02: Brushing up on the affairs of a wild world
11/12/02: Make Dems filibuster 10 minutes with Robert L. Bartley
11/08/02: National Geographic: Urban overpopulation is good
11/05/02: The bloody consequences of a broken INS: Ten minutes with Michelle Malkin
11/01/02: Going to pot; thank heaven for media overkill
10/29/02: It's all about federalism: Ten minutes with Jonah Goldberg
10/25/02: Frank Sinatra, Kurt Cobain, Mad Magazine will never die
10/22/02: Here's why Orwell matters: Ten minutes with Christopher Hitchens
10/18/02: The sniper knocks Iraq off the covers
10/15/02: Iraq, oil and war: 10 minutes with ... economist/historian Daniel Yergin
10/11/02: England's gun-control experiment has backfired
10/04/02: Buchanan the media baron?
09/27/02: Analyzing Esquire, GQ is not for the squeamish
09/20/02: CEOs: The rise and fall of American heroes
09/13/02: Skeptics remind U.S. to calm down
09/10/02: 'A failure to recognize a failure': 15 minutes with ... Bill Gertz
09/06/02: Rating the 9-11 mags
08/30/02: Bad trains, bad planes, and bad automobiles
08/28/02: Baseball, broken, can be fixed: 15 minutes with George Will
08/16/02: 9-11 overload has already begun
08/13/02: Tell us what you really think, Ann Coulter
08/09/02: A funny take on a new kind of suburb
08/02/02: It's not the humidity, it's the (media) heat wave; the death of American cities
07/12/02: Colombia's drug lords are all business
07/09/02: If capitalism is 'soulless' then show me something better: 10 minutes with Alan Reynolds
06/25/02: Origins of a scandal: 10 minutes with Michael Rose
06/21/02: 9/11 report unearths good, bad and ugly
06/18/02: The FBI is rebounding 10 Minutes with Ronald Kessler
06/14/02: U.S. News opens closet of Secret Service
06/11/02: 10 minutes with William Lind: Can America survive in this 'fourth-generation' world?
06/07/02: America, warts and all
05/30/02: FBI saga gets more depressing
05/13/02: The magazine industry's annual exercise in self-puffery
04/30/02: 10 Minutes with ... The New York Sun's Seth Lipsky
04/26/02: Will the American Taliban go free?
04/23/02: 10 minutes with ... Dinesh D'Souza
04/19/02: Saddam starting to show his age
04/12/02: Newsweek puts suicide bombing in perspective
04/09/02: How polls distort the news, change the outcome of elections and encourage legislation that undermines the foundations of the republic
04/05/02: Looking into the state of American greatness
03/25/02: The American President and the Peruvian Shoeshine Boys
03/22/02: Troublemaking intellectual puts Churchill in spotlight
03/20/02: 10 minutes with ... Bill Bennett
03/18/02: Suddenly, it's cool again to be a man
03/12/02: 10 minutes with Ken Adelman
03/08/02: TIME asks the nation a scary question
03/05/02: 10 minutes with ... Rich Lowry
02/26/02: 10 minutes with ... Tony Snow
02/12/02: Has Soldier of Fortune gone soft?

© 2002, Bill Steigerwald