Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Jan. 22, 2002 / 9 Shevat, 5762

Robert W. Tracinski

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
John Leo
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
Kathleen Parker
Wes Pruden
Sam Schulman
Amity Shlaes
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports

Liberal conspiracy theories -- THE U.N., the Trilateral Commission, the international conspiracy of Jewish bankers -- these are the conspiracy theories for which right-wing nuts are infamous. But what about the conspiracy theories of the left? I'm sure you have heard of them: the Military-Industrial Complex, the "vast right-wing conspiracy," and, of course, the international conspiracy of multinational conglomerates. Now many Democrats are proposing a new candidate: the Bush-Enron conspiracy.

What is the evidence for this conspiracy? As Enron teetered on the brink of bankruptcy, some of its top executives -- who had also been major contributors to the president's campaign -- phoned members of the Bush Cabinet and asked them to help bail the company out. The Bush officials' response? They did nothing.

So where is the scandal? From what do the Democrats hope to manufacture "Enron-Gate"?

Democratic spin-doctors are working feverishly to have their cake and eat it, too. First, they claim that the phone calls show that "Bush is cozy with wealthy moguls."

Then, if anyone points out that Bush did not actually give the moguls any special favors, the Democrats condemn him for that, too. The administration, they say, "could have done more to protect employees and shareholders."

The political opportunism of this damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't approach is too obvious for some Democrats. So they have opted for versions of the conspiracy theory that are more subtle -- but no more convincing.

Enron is described as a cabal of free-marketers seeking to profit from electricity deregulation. This is wrong on three counts. First, electric utilities have not, by and large, been deregulated; California's power "deregulation," for example, was enacted through hundreds of pages of new regulations. Second, Enron does not represent the free market; it was a major proponent, for example, of the global warming scare. Enron sought to profit, not from free markets, but from the higher demand for natural gas caused by government restrictions on other fossil fuels. Last but not least, Enron clearly did not profit from anything; it went bankrupt.

Others charge that this is an example of a company using political contributions to flout the law. In The New York Times, Paul Krugman screams that "politicians with personal ties to Enron ... took care to exempt Enron from regulation." But neither he nor anyone else has named a single specific regulation from which Enron was exempted. And if political contributions are to blame, then why did the Bush administration refuse to bail out Enron, despite the firm's large political contributions to their boss?

The last resort of this conspiracy theory is the most revealing. There is no specific political conspiracy, some commentators concede, but merely a demonstration of the evils of big business and free markets. Newsweek's Allan Sloan, for example, blames the scandal on the alleged greed of Enron's managers, who pocketed stock options for years, then ran the company into the ground. He also claims that Arthur Andersen -- the accounting company that failed to decry Enron's dishonest bookkeeping -- was kept silent by millions in consulting fees, and that Wall Street brokers were seduced by their shares in Enron's energy trades.

But none of this makes sense, either. Enron executives could have pocketed many more stock options if they hadn't crashed their company's stock; Andersen could have gathered more consulting fees, rather than destroying its reputation; and Wall Street could have had many more energy deals to broker.

No, the facts don't explain the Enron conspiracy theories. All that the facts reveal is an unsuccessful conspiracy by corporate managers to hide their incompetence. So why do the liberals think this has vast implications, that it might go "all the way to the top"? What explains these theories is not any facts, but rather a basic philosophic outlook, a theory that views the entire capitalist economy as a giant conspiracy to exploit the little guy. They got this view from Marx, who explained everything in terms of the "bourgeoisie" conspiring to exploit the "proletariat."

Marx also taught them that all ideas, political arguments, and party platforms were just thinly disguised elements of this same conspiracy of exploitation. That explains why the liberals see this as a political scandal. You didn't think that Republicans advocate free markets because they actually believe in their ideas, did you? No, they do it because they're in on the conspiracy.

Marx's theories may be all but dead, but they live on in the hearts of the left, and the liberals' exploitation of the Enron case is their latest feeble attempt to breathe life back into this discredited philosophy.

Comment on JWR contributor Robert W. Tracinski's column by clicking here.

01/15/02: Fading shock and fading resolve
01/08/02: Argentina's intellectual collapse
12/31/02: The real person of the year
12/26/01: With friends like us ...
12/19/01: Ending the "peace process war"
12/11/01: The ruthless grip of logic
12/04/01: War powers without war
11/27/01: An Afghanistan Thanksgiving
11/20/01: The end of the beginning
11/06/01: The phony war
10/30/01: A war against Islam
10/23/01: The economics of war
10/16/01: A culture of death
10/11/01: An empire of ideals
10/01/01: Why they hate us
09/24/01: The lessons of war
09/20/01: What a real war looks like
09/17/01: America's war song
09/12/01: It is worse than Pearl Harbor
09/11/01: Out of the fire and back into the frying pan
09/05/01: The UN Conference of Racists
08/28/01: Waging war on profits and lives
08/20/01: The Bizarro-World War
08/08/01: The death toll of environmentalism
07/31/01: Where does America stand?
07/25/01: Barbarians at the G8
07/17/01: The carrot and the carrot
07/11/01: The real Brave New World
07/03/01: The child-manipulators
06/19/01: The scientist trap
06/11/01: The National Academy of Dubious Science