
I have two candidates for their consideration:
Last week Clinton accused Gabbard of being a "Russian asset" as she offered new excuses beyond the real ones for why she lost the 2016 election. In a podcast interview with
Clinton offered no evidence to support her allegations.
Gabbard, who joined the military shortly after 9/11, fired back in the take-no-prisoner style of
No parsing of words there. It's the rhetorical equivalent of what they call a "smackdown" in professional wrestling.
Gabbard later tweeted, "It's now clear that this primary is between you and me. Don't cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly."
Put these two in a ring, charge to watch it on TV and I'm there with popcorn. Wow! There's nothing like a good war of words for the ultimate in political entertainment. And you thought "The Apprentice" was must-see TV.
It appears Clinton cannot get over her 2016 election defeat and so she blames everyone but herself. It was because of her poor campaign, insincerity, lack of a credible platform, a sense of entitlement and an abrasive personality, as well as her failure to campaign in key states that led to her defeat. She didn't connect with voters and still comes across as cold and calculating, not to mention dishonest. But we already knew that.
It was Clinton, while secretary of state and moving around classified emails on servers where they didn't belong, who came up with a "reset" button for
So, according to Clinton, Gabbard is a Russian asset and so is
If this followed a scenario similar to the one
That comment, along with many others, "pins" Hillary to the mat for the obligatory three-count.
Sign up for the daily JWR update. It's free. Just click here.
(COMMENT, BELOW)
Cal Thomas, America's most-syndicated columnist, is the author of 10 books.