Jewish World Review April 9, 1999 /23 Nissan 5759
Russia and the Serbs
(JWR) ---- (http://www.jewishworldreview.com)
RUSSIA HAS GONE TO WAR over the Balkans three times within the span of one
century. Yet our politicians and media pundits seem to pay little attention
to the danger that Russia will escalate its military aid to the Serbs ---
even though there have already been rumblings out of Moscow about sending
"volunteers" to fight against NATO and about the possibility of equipping
the Serbs with tactical nuclear weapons.
The Russians have already equipped Serbian forces with surface-to-air
missiles more deadly than anything American pilots have had to confront in
Iraq. Russia can send in other sophisticated weapons, as well as
American policy wonks and media pundits can point out how none of this is
really in Russia's national interest, because the Russians have all sorts of
internal economic and political problems. They don't need a military
confrontation with the United States in the Balkans.
We don't need a military confrontation with the Russians in the Balkans
either, but our troops are there and we are dropping bombs. In both
countries, "national interest" can be redefined to mean the interests of
whatever politicians are in charge.
The most important interest of leading Russian politicians is in who
succeeds Boris Yeltsin when his term expires -- or when he expires, given
his fragile health. Their next most important political interest is in how a
successor can rally the demoralized Russian people around a new regime.
Inflicting a military or political defeat on the American-led NATO forces
in the Balkans could be just what the doctor ordered to meet these political
goals. Yeltsin himself could use such a victory over the United States to
become a national hero again and refute the claims of his political enemies
that he is an American puppet.
Even more would such a victory serve the interests of potential successors
who are waiting in the wings, many of them with far more strident
nationalistic aims and rhetoric.
Let us never forget that the Russians got into the First World War because
a Serb shot an Austrian archduke in Sarajevo and the Germans backed Austrian
Was this in Russia's national interest? It turned out not even to be in the
interest of the czar who backed the Serbs, for it led ultimately to the
Bolshevik revolution and the slaughter of the czar and his family. For
Russia, it led to a nightmare under the Communists that lasted nearly
three-quarters of a century.
But history cannot be controlled like a machine and the forces of war
cannot be measured out by the teaspoon. The emotional and political ties of
the Russians to their fellow Slavs in the Balkans go back for centuries. No
Russian leader -- whether czarist, Communist or democratic -- can ignore
those ties and any of them can exploit such ties for his own political ends.
The Russians today are not happy campers about the expansion of NATO
eastward, into what would otherwise be their own sphere of influence.
Administering a bloody nose to NATO in the Balkans would be a strong
reassertion of Russian power and influence in the region, as well as a
domestic tonic politically.
Maybe Yeltsin won't go this route. But, even if he does not, we would be
fools to rely on his successors having similar forbearance for years to
Although Bill Clinton is a classic example of the "me generation" and the
"now generation," what he is getting us into in the Balkans can last long
after he is gone. American troops have already been in the Balkans for
years, even though they were supposedly sent there only for a few months.
Two armed giants, groping around in a fog, are a danger to themselves and
to the world. Some dangers must be faced, when the stakes are high enough.
But there were no stakes for Americans in the Balkans, except the stakes
that we have created by intervening.
Humanitarian concerns are not national interests. If we wish to send young
Americans off to die for humanitarian causes, then at least we need to face
that fact and have a specific policy for going in and getting out. But all
that this administration has is a feckless "do something" habit, combined
with lots of political spin.
In the Balkans we have all the classic ingredients of historic tragedies --
short-sightedness, feckless groping, and an arrogant assumption that we can
04/06/99: Random thoughts
03/31/99: Irresponsible "experts"
03/29/99: Another Doleful prospect?
03/23/99: Random thoughts
03/22/99: Loving enemies
03/19/99: Naming names
03/15/99: Undermining the military
03/10/99: Joe DiMaggio -- icon of an era
03/02/99: Facts versus dogma on guns
03/01/99: Losing the cultural wars
02/22/99: "Saving" social security
02/18/99: Too many Ph.Ds?
02/8/99: A national disaster
02/8/99: Economic fallacies in the media: Part II
02/5/99: Why economists visit dentists so often
02/2/99: Warning: Good news
01/29/99: What is at stake?
01/26/99:Moral bankruptcy in the schools
01/22/99: Who is going to convict Santa Claus?
01/19/99: Seeing through the spin
01/13/99: A trial is a trial is a trial
01/11/99:Trials and tribulations
01/08/99: Rays of hope
01/04/99: Random thoughts
12/31/98: The President versus the presidency
12/29/98: The time is now!
12/23/98: World-class hypocrisy
12/21/98: The spreading corruption
12/17/98: Politically "contrite"
12/16/98: Polls and partisanship
12/14/98: The "non-profit" halo
12/11/98: Corruption and confusion
12/03/98: The health care "crisis"
11/30/98: Knowing what you are talking about
11/23/98: The impeachment legacy
11/23/98: Random thoughts
11/19/98: Tales out of bureaucracies
11/16/98: Scholarships based on scholarship
11/12/98: Forward march
11/09/98: Moral outrage
11/05/98: Will the Republicans ever learn?
11/02/98: A voter's duty
10/30/98: The poverty pimp's poem
10/29/98: Random thoughts on the election
10/27/98: "Partisan" and "unfair"
10/21/98: McGwire, Maris and the Babe
10/20/98: MURDER IS MURDER!
10/16/98: Lightweight Boxer
10/14/98: A strange word
10/09/98: Impeachment standards
10/08/98: Alternatives to seriousness
10/07/98: Heredity, environment and talk
10/02/98: A much-needed guide
10/01/98: Starr's real crime
9/24/98: Costs and power
9/18/98: Are we sheep?
9/16/98: Judicial review
9/15/98: Hillary Rodham Crook?
9/14/98: Taking stock
9/11/98: Moment of truth
9/04/98: Random thoughts
8/31/98: The twilight of special prosecutors?
8/26/98: "Doing a good job"
8/24/98: America on trial?
8/19/98: Played for fools
8/17/98: A childish letter
8/11/98: Hiding behind a woman
8/07/98: A flying walrus in Washington?
8/03/98: "Affordability" strikes again
7/31/98: Random thoughts
7/27/98: Faith and mountains
7/24/98: Clinton in Wonderland
7/20/98: Where is black 'leadership' leading?
7/16/98: Do 'minorities' really have it that bad?
7/14/98: Race dialogue: same old stuff
7/10/98: Honest history
7/09/98: Dumb is dangerous
7/02/98: Gun-safety starts with
6/30/98: When more is less
6/29/98: Are educators above the law?
6/26/98: Random Thoughts
6/24/98: An angry letter
6/22/98: Sixties sentimentalism
6/19/98:Dumbing down anti-trust
6/15/98: A changing of the guard?
6/11/98: Presidential privileges
6/8/98: Fast computers and slow antitrust
6/3/98: Can stalling backfire?
5/29/98: The insulation of the Left
5/25/98: Missing the point in the media
5/22/98: The lessons of Indonesia
5/20/98: Smart but silent
5/18/98: Israel, Clinton and character
5/14/98: Monica Lewinsky's choices
5/11/98: Random thoughts
5/7/98: Media obstruction of justice
5/4/98: Dangerous "safety"
4/30/98: The naked truth
4/22/98: Playing fair and square
4/19/98: Bad teachers"
4/15/98: "Clinton in Africa
4/13/98: "Bundling and unbundling
4/9/98: "Rising or falling Starr
4/6/98: "Was Clinton ‘vindicated'?
3/26/98: "Diasters -- natural and political"
3/24/98: "A pattern of behavior"
3/22/98: Innocent explanations
3/19/98: Kathleen Willey and Anita Hill
3/17/98: Search and destroy
3/12/98: Media Circus versus Justice
3/3/98: Cheap Shot Time
2/26/98: The Wrong Filter
2/24/98: Trial by Media
2/20/98: Dancing Around the Realities
2/19/98: A "Do Something" War?
2/12/98: Julian Simon, combatant in a 200-year war
2/6/98: A rush to rhetoric
©1999, Creators Syndicate