JWR Jeff JacobyBen WattenbergRoger Simon
Mona CharenLinda Chavez

Paul Greenberg Larry ElderJonathan S. Tobin
Thomas SowellMUGGERWalter Williams
Don FederCal Thomas
Political Cartoons
Left, Right & Center

Jewish World Review Nov. 16, 1998 /27 Mar-Cheshvan, 5759

Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell Scholarships based on scholarship

THE LATEST ACADEMIC SCANDAL is that scholarships are beginning to be based on -- scholarship. Those people whose personal experience has been confined to the real world may have to reorient themselves to the academic way of thinking, in order to understand why it is considered scandalous to base financial aid on a student's academic achievement level.

For decades, colleges and universities have been following a policy of basing financial aid, not on the student's academic performance, but on "need" as defined by some rigid formula. The idea of providing financial incentives for students to excel academically in high school, or investing the scholarships money in a way that gets the most bang for the buck, has been anathema in academe.

In other words, the most marginally qualified student, who just barely managed to get admitted to the college, was entitled to as much financial aid as a class valedictorian with straight A's and stratospheric test scores. If the student who just barely made the cut happened to come from a family with not as much money as the valedictorian's family, then the scholarship money would be greater for the weaker student.

Strange as this might seem to those beyond the ivy-covered walls, it is perfectly consistent with the whole mindset that pervades the academy. The ideal is "fairness" in the sense of equalized conditions.

Increasingly, in recent years, there have been expressions of regret and much hand-wringing as this ideal has been eroded. Two things have brought this on. First, blank checks from government to academia are no longer available to finance every program, policy or illusion that becomes fashionable on campus. Second, a Justice Department antitrust investigation of collusion among colleges put an end to an incredible cartel that had developed among the top trend-setting institutions.

For more than three decades, financial aid officials from Ivy League colleges, M.I.T., Amherst and other such institutions met each spring to compare what each of them was offering as financial aid to each of the students applying to more than one institution in this cartel. The net result was that financial aid from each member of the cartel would be set so that the student would have to pay the same net amount, regardless of which of these institutions he or she chose to attend.

Since the tuitions listed in college catalogues are simply list prices that are seldom actually charged, what was called "financial aid" was often more like discounts from the list price, such as are common in many commercial transactions. The cartel was essentially engaging in price discrimination, violating antitrust laws.

Once this cartel was broken up, its members began competing with one another for the best students. That is how scholarships came to be based on scholarship, much to the anguish of academic utopians.

"We are experiencing a heaping on of greater privilege to wealthy and middle-class kids," according to Professor Morton Schapiro of the University of Southern California. The way he sees it, "the poor" are being "restricted" to community colleges and are "even being squeezed out of four-year public institutions."

Those unfamiliar with academic Newspeak may need a translation: Students who do well academically are receiving a "privilege" rather than a reward when they get scholarships, because they are likely to come from middle-class or higher-income families, who promote academic achievement among their children. It is "unfair" in some cosmic sense that some children come from education-minded families and others do not.

While youngsters from low-income families who do well academically are equally eligible for scholarships and admission to elite colleges, their academic levels often will not get them past the community college levels. A further "injustice," from this perspective, is that a growing unwillingness to finance high school "remedial" courses in college means that those students who have not bothered to get prepared for college will be "squeezed out."

In this Alice-in-Wonderland world, "merit" is a dirty word and things like incentives and rewards smack too much of the world of business, to which academics feel vastly superior. The question is not why academics think this way. The question is why so many others go along with them.

11/12/98: Forward march
11/09/98: Moral outrage
11/05/98: Will the Republicans ever learn?
11/02/98: A voter's duty
10/30/98: The poverty pimp's poem
10/29/98: Random thoughts on the election
10/27/98: "Partisan" and "unfair"
10/23/98: Ed-u-kai-tchun
10/21/98: McGwire, Maris and the Babe
10/20/98: MURDER IS MURDER!
10/16/98: Lightweight Boxer
10/14/98: A strange word
10/09/98: Impeachment standards
10/08/98: Alternatives to seriousness
10/07/98: Heredity, environment and talk
10/02/98: A much-needed guide
10/01/98: Starr's real crime
9/24/98: Costs and power
9/18/98: Are we sheep?
9/16/98: Judicial review
9/15/98: Hillary Rodham Crook?
9/14/98: Taking stock
9/11/98: Moment of truth
9/04/98: Random thoughts
8/31/98: The twilight of special prosecutors?
8/26/98: "Doing a good job"
8/24/98: America on trial?
8/19/98: Played for fools
8/17/98: A childish letter
8/11/98: Hiding behind a woman
8/07/98: A flying walrus in Washington?
8/03/98: "Affordability" strikes again
7/31/98: Random thoughts
7/27/98: Faith and mountains
7/24/98: Clinton in Wonderland
7/20/98: Where is black 'leadership' leading?
7/16/98: Do 'minorities' really have it that bad?
7/14/98: Race dialogue: same old stuff
7/10/98: Honest history
7/09/98: Dumb is dangerous
7/02/98: Gun-safety starts with
parental responsibility
6/30/98: When more is less
6/29/98: Are educators above the law?
6/26/98: Random Thoughts
6/24/98: An angry letter
6/22/98: Sixties sentimentalism
6/19/98:Dumbing down anti-trust
6/15/98: A changing of the guard?
6/11/98: Presidential privileges
6/8/98: Fast computers and slow antitrust
6/3/98: Can stalling backfire?
5/29/98: The insulation of the Left
5/25/98: Missing the point in the media
5/22/98: The lessons of Indonesia
5/20/98: Smart but silent
5/18/98: Israel, Clinton and character
5/14/98: Monica Lewinsky's choices
5/11/98: Random thoughts
5/7/98: Media obstruction of justice
5/4/98: Dangerous "safety"
5/1/98: Abolish Adolescence!
4/30/98: The naked truth
4/22/98: Playing fair and square
4/19/98: Bad teachers"
4/15/98: "Clinton in Africa "
4/13/98: "Bundling and unbundling "
4/9/98: "Rising or falling Starr "
4/6/98: "Was Clinton ‘vindicated'? "
3/26/98: "Diasters -- natural and political"
3/24/98: "A pattern of behavior"
3/22/98: Innocent explanations
3/19/98: Kathleen Willey and Anita Hill
3/17/98: Search and destroy
3/12/98: Media Circus versus Justice
3/6/98: Vindication
3/3/98: Cheap Shot Time
2/26/98: The Wrong Filter
2/24/98: Trial by Media
2/20/98: Dancing Around the Realities
2/19/98: A "Do Something" War?
2/12/98: Julian Simon, combatant in a 200-year war
2/6/98: A rush to rhetoric

©1998, Creators Syndicate, Inc.