Jewish World Review March 23, 2001/ 28 Adar 5761
http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- HUZZAH for George W. Bush. Hook 'em Horns, Hail to the Redskins, Wooooo Pig Soooooie and cheer, cheer for old Notre Dame.
The president yesterday told the lawyers to drop dead, or at least get lost, and the rest of us should spend the day cheering.
White House Counsel Al Gonzales, on instructions from the president, officially notified Martha Barnett, president of the American Bar Association, that the White House would no longer send the lawyers advance word on names under consideration for judicial appointments to give them an opportunity to dig up dirt.
President Eisenhower first asked the bar association to review presidential choices and since then we got the likes of Earl Warren and Thurgood Marshall. Naturally the lawyers are squawking, but unless you're a lawyer with axes to grind it's difficult to argue with the reasons set out by Mr. Gonzales.
"The question is whether the ABA should play a unique, quasi-official role and then have its voice heard before and above all others," he wrote. "We do not think that kind of preferential arrangement is either appropriate or fair."
Neither hairdressers nor psychiatrists nor morticians get such a voice; neither preachers, Volkswagen mechanics nor Sons of Confederate Veterans. Why should lawyers?
The Bush administration was careful to stay away from the argument that the president listened to conservatives and agreed to pay back the American Bar Association for borking the Bork nomination to the Supreme Court.
"I can't speak for those who might harbor that view," Mr. Gonzales says. "This is based purely on the principle that it's inappropriate and unfair to give preferential treatment to any single group." Perhaps. In any event the White House ought to be perfectly capable of making a "full vetting" of judicial prospects, and Mr. Gonzales says the White House won't substitute any other outside group, liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat, to do its work.
"It would be particularly inappropriate, in our view, to grant a preferential, quasi-official role to a group, such as the ABA, that takes public positions on divisive political, legal and social issues that come before the courts," he told Mzz Barnett. The bar association insists that the research committee is "isolated" from partisan considerations, and Phillip Anderson of Little Rock, the immediate past president of the association (all roads still lead back to Arkansas), insists that the auditors consider only integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament. The association's screening, he says, has given the United States "a federal bench that is the envy of the world."
Indeed, it may be that this envy is what drives so much jealousy of America throughout the world, though some of us would have thought that the wretched refuse of the backwaters of the globe would have envied us for Buicks, Coca-Cola, cheeseburgers, Old Navy, Jamie Lee Curtis, Elvis, Puffy Combs and Starbucks, and not necessarily for David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
The Senate Judiciary Committee noted, as early as 1997, that the American Bar Association has taken inflexibly partisan positions on abortion, affirmative action, flag desecration, religious liberty, welfare reform, deportation of criminal aliens and, naturally, "product liability," since suing people is what keeps law schools open. The lawyers agree with prevailing public opinion on none of these issues. George Bushnell, who was then the president of the association, referred to the emerging Republican majority in 1995 as a collection of "reptilian bastards," which, even if accurate, hardly demonstrates the evenhanded neutrality with which the association insists it approaches the task of measuring judicial appointments.
Bill Clinton is the kind of president the bar association wants to find judicial candidates for. In 1997, five former bar association presidents rebuked Judge David Santelle for lunching with Lauch Faircloth, a senator from North Carolina, shortly before he appointed Kenneth Starr as the special prosecutor to look into the sordid pasts of the Clintons. An appeals court judge, a Democrat who had been appointed to the bench by Jimmy Carter, investigated the issue and determined that Judge Santelle had not violated "legal ethics" (no laughing, please) by going to lunch with his old friend.
The bar association can and no doubt will continue to find
(or manufacture) dirt on candidates it doesn't like. It's a free
country. But George W. Bush, by telling the lawyers they can
talk but he doesn't have to listen, pushed them an inch or two
out of the lives of the rest of us yesterday, and for that we can
03/21/01: Why can't senators be nice to Mom?
11/10/00: Something sinister in Palm Beach
11/07/00: Low days in the life of the ruptured duck
11/06/00: A little race baiting in the final hours
11/01/00: Creator gets a hard time on the hustings
10/27/00: The sorcerer rides to rescue his apprentice
10/25/00: The founding father with a story to tell
10/23/00: A lonely passion for religious rights
10/16/00: Spending blood on the folly of fools
10/11/00: A big night for the embellisher-in-chief
10/06/00: AlGore's black problem
10/04/00: In headlong pursuit of the bigot vote
10/02/00: A modest proposal for Rick Lazio
09/27/00: When folks at home give up on a scamp
09/25/00: Gore plot exposed! The secret minutes
09/18/00: Playing politics with the blood supply
09/14/00: Al sets out to find his 'tolerance level'
09/12/00: When it's time for a thumb in the eye
09/07/00: Making a daughter a campaign asset
09/04/00: A footnote to the lie: How he beats the rap
08/30/00: Unbearable lightness of a cyberjournal
08/21/00: Clinton chickens on AlGore's roost
08/16/00: The long goodbye to California's cash
08/09/00: Innocence by proxy is a risky scheme
08/07/00: After insulin shock, an authentic rouser
08/02/00: When it gets hard not to get a little giddy
07/31/00: George W.'s legions of summer soldiers
07/26/00: He's set a surprise --- or a trap for himself
07/24/00: How do you serve a turkey in August?
07/19/00: Would Hillary sling a lie about a slur?
07/17/00: Process, not peace, at a Velveeta summit
07/12/00: The Texas two-step, a nudge and a wink
07/10/00: The Great Mentioner and his busy season
07/05/00: No Mexican standoff in these results
07/03/00: Denting a few egos in the U.S. Senate
06/28/00: Bureaucracy amok! Punctuation in peril!
06/26/00: The water torture of American resolve
06/21/00: The happy hangman is a busy hangman
06/19/00: Dick Gephardt finds a Dixie dreamboat
06/14/00: Taking a byte out of innovation
06/12/00: 'Go away, little boy, you're bothering us'
06/07/00: When a little envy is painful to watch
06/05/00: Fire and thunder, bubble and squeak
05/31/00: South of the border, politics is pepper
05/26/00: Running out of luck with home folks
05/24/00: The heart says no, but the head says yes
05/22/00: A fine opportunity to set an example
05/17/00: The Sunday school for Republicans
05/15/00: Hillary's surrogate for telling tall tales
05/10/00: Listening to the voice of an authentic man
05/08/00: First a lot of bluster, then the retreat
05/02/00: Good news for Rudy, bad news for Hillary
04/28/00: The long goodbye to Elian's boyhood
04/25/00: Spooked by Castro, Bubba blinks
04/14/00: One flag down and two memorials to go
04/11/00: Consistency finds a jewel in Janet Reno
04/07/00: Here's the good word (and it's in English)
04/04/00: When bureaucrats mock the courts
03/28/00: How Hollywood sets the virtual table
03/24/00: Dissing a president can ruin a whole day
03/20/00: When shame begets the painful insult
03/14/00: The risky business of making an apology
03/10/00: The pouters bugging a weary John McCain
03/07/00: When all good things (sob) come to an end