Clicking on banner ads enables JWR to constantly improve
Jewish World Review Feb. 10, 2000 /4 Adar I, 5760

Michelle Malkin

JWR's Pundits
World Editorial
Cartoon Showcase

Mallard Fillmore

Michael Barone
Mona Charen
Linda Chavez
David Corn
Ann Coulter
Greg Crosby
Larry Elder
Don Feder
Suzanne Fields
Paul Greenberg
Bob Greene
Betsy Hart
Nat Hentoff
David Horowitz
Arianna Huffington
Marianne Jennings
Michael Kelly
Mort Kondracke
Ch. Krauthammer
Lawrence Kudlow
Dr. Laura
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Chris Matthews
Michael Medved
MUGGER
Kathleen Parker
Debbie Schlussel
Sam Schulman
Roger Simon
Tony Snow
Thomas Sowell
Cal Thomas
Jonathan S. Tobin
Ben Wattenberg
George Will
Bruce Williams
Walter Williams
Mort Zuckerman

Consumer Reports
Newswatch
Weekly Standard

Econophone

Trakdata


Buddhist temple untouchables

http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- WASHINGTON, D.C. Live, from the sixth floor of the U.S. District Courthouse, I watched the futility of campaign finance reform unfold before my eyes. The federal criminal trial of Democratic fund-raiser Maria Hsia Vice President Al Gore's infamous Buddhist temple gal pal -- opened here in the courtroom of Judge Paul Friedman on Monday.

It's a case study in the senselessness of passing new laws to fix The System.

Hsia, a Taiwan-born immigration consultant and longtime Friend of Gore, denies taking part in an elaborate conspiracy to funnel illegal campaign contributions worth more than $100,000 through the California-based Hsi Lai temple. She is charged with five felony counts of causing false campaign finance reports to be filed. According to federal prosecutors, Hsia allegedly gathered dozens of checks from Buddhist monks, nuns and other temple supporters.

Three of the nuns testified to Congress in 1998 that the temple reimbursed them and others for $55,000 in Democratic National Committee donations, which were drummed up by Hsia the day after Gore's two-hour visit to Hsi Lai in April 1996.

Hsia's congenitally indignant attorney Nancy Luque argued in court this week that her client, a naturalized U.S. citizen, was simply a passionate "community activist" who cared about "safe streets and minority youth schools." Soliciting straw donations from foreign monks and nuns isn't a crime, you see. It's free speech! The noble Hsia "didn't do that for personal glory," Luque explained. "She did that to support causes she believed in. That activity is protected by the First Amendment."

Luque further asserted that her cash-collecting client had no obligation whatsoever to find out whether the temple donors who forked over four-figure checks were true and legal sources of campaign dough: "Maria Hsia is not responsible for what others do." Besides, Luque rationalized, "Even if Maria Hsia knew that contributions came from somewhere else, how does just knowing cause a lie?"

So Hsia is not responsible even if she knew laws were being broken because knowing a lie isn't telling one. The monks and nuns were not responsible because they were unwitting dupes who didn't know the laws. The Democrat campaign treasurers who accepted the checks from Hsia were not responsible because they can't check every contribution. And Al Gore is not responsible because there was no controlling legal authority.

To fix this broken system, reformers led by John McCain and Bill Bradley would ban soft money contributions to political parties, increase public financing of campaigns, and guarantee free television time for candidates. McCain and Bradley invoke the Buddhist temple scandal religiously in support of their plans. But their reform amounts to giving a new paint job to an old jalopy. As any two-bit campaign finance scofflaw in America well knows, piling on more rules simply creates the illusion of reform.

It is already against the law for nonprofit religious institutions to raise money for political candidates. Yet the Hsi Lai Temple is not on trial for violating existing federal law.

It is already against the law for political candidates to raise money at temples. Yet Al Gore is not on trial for violating existing federal law.

It is already against the law for foreign nationals to make contributions in connection to any candidate. Yet the foreign donor who allegedly provided Hsia with temple-funneled money is not on trial for violating existing federal law.

And it is already against the law to make contributions by one person in the name of another. Yet none of the conduits or concealers named as participants in Hsia's unholy laundering scheme are on trial for violating existing federal law.

"The system breaks down" because of deceitful fund-raisers like Hsia, lead prosecutor Eric Yaffe said in his opening statement. But what about everyone else involved? Thanks to the government's anemic, uneven, and incompetent enforcement of existing laws, our system of campaign finance disclosure was a sorry joke long before Hsia came along.

Hsia's trial has just begun, but the verdict is already in. No matter what the jury finds, it's business as usual for the untouchable money shakers, foreign straw donors, politicians with pointless legislative remedies, and hapless government officials who can barely enforce the glut of campaign finance rules already on the books.


JWR contributor Michelle Malkin can be reached by clicking here.

Up

02/08/00: CDC: Caught Devouring Cash
02/04/00: Hillary's poisoned poster child
02/01/00: Corporate welfare on ice
01/28/00: The silly sound of silence
01/26/00: The Old Media meltdown
01/20/00: The pied pipers of KidCare
01/18/00: Our imperious judiciary
01/14/00: Tune out Columbine chorus
01/12/00: Dying to be an American
01/10/00: Time for smokers' revolt?
12/30/99: Reading, writing, PlayStation?
12/27/99: Fight money-grubbing mallrats
12/23/99: Christmas for Cornilous Pixley
12/20/99: Who will help the Hmong?
12/16/99: Shame on corn-fed politicians
12/13/99: EPA vs. the American Dream
12/09/99: Look behind the Pokemon curtain
12/06/99: Amateur hour in Seattle
11/30/99: Stop the Ritalin racketeers
11/23/99: Welfare for a sports fatcat
11/19/99: Jeb Bush's political ploy of the week
11/16/99: Ben & Jerry serve up junk science
11/12/99: A monumental waste of our veterans' resources
11/10/99: Tax-and-spend schizophrenia
11/05/99: Spooky Guy Haunts the Capital
11/02/99: Mourning the loss of the last Liberty Tree
10/27/99: AOL goes AWOL on parents
10/22/99: The persecution of Harry Potter
10/20/99: Don't doctor the law
10/14/99: The trouble with kids today
10/12/99: Pro-animal, pro-abortion, anti-speech?
10/07/99: Beltway press corps needs more skunks
09/30/99: ESPN overlooks athlete of faith, grace, and guts
09/27/99: Personal freedom going up in smoke
09/15/99: Farewell, "Miss" America
09/10/99: Will George W. work for a color-blind America?
09/03/99: Feminization of gun debate drowns out sober analysis
08/27/99: America is abundant land of equal-opportunity insult
08/10/99: Protect the next generation from diversity do-goodism
08/04/99: Sweepstakes vs. state lottery: double standards on gambling
07/21/99: "True-life tales from the Thin Red Line" (or "Honor those who sacrificed their lives for peace")
07/21/99: Reading, 'Riting, and Raunchiness?
07/14/99: Journalists' group-think is not unity
06/30/99: July Fourth programming for the Springer generation
06/25/99: Speechless in Seattle
06/15/99: Making a biblical argument against federal death taxes

© 2000, Creators Syndicate