Jewish World Review Nov. 17, 1999 /8 Kislev, 5760
Uncle Sam, deadbeat
THE THIRD TIME may be the charm. Twice now, Bill Clinton has vetoed bills that would have
allowed the United States to pay its long-due arrears at the United Nations and save its
voting rights, which are about to be revoked unless Uncle Sam comes up with $926 million in
Why would a president hesitate to pay the country's bills? Because this one loves abortion
more than he does his country's credit rating.
Each time Congress has approved the payment to the U.N., it attached a rider specifying that
no funds would be used to finance abortions overseas -- a proviso that was official American
policy until this administration. But one of this president's first acts on taking office in 1993
was to revoke that policy.
If Bill Clinton does stick to any one principle, it's that developing countries need to prevent
what our elite view as surplus population. It's as if he wanted birth, not abortion, to be rare,
safe and legal.
Demographers may debate the wisdom of aborting population growth, for the world has
never been so populous and the life span of the species so long. Or its general health so
good. Maybe because man's scientific creativity continues to keep pace with his biological
But to question abortion is to question not just the conventional wisdom, but an article of faith
in this culture. It's a culture that is always producing new deathstyles -- the latest is assisted
suicide -- but abortion remains its major sacrament. Though in the formal rituals at
appropriation time, abortion is always referred to obliquely as Family Planning.
Surely no politician better reflects the post-modern culture than this stylish president. He's
vetoed this appropriation bill twice now -- not because he loves the U.N. less, but because
he loves abortion more. Now with the United States already labeled a deadbeat and about to
lose its U.N. vote, he may relent. The modern abolitionists in Congress certainly won't;
they're determined to end Uncle Sam's role as the great promoter of abortion abroad.
``The basic parameters of the deal are tied down,'' says Dennis Hastert, the Republican
speaker of the House, who sounds ripe for the plucking. As soon as some of us hear the
overused word Parameters, we tap our breasts -- to make sure our wallets are still in place.
If the Republicans haven't gone over the bill's language with a fine-toothed electron
microscope and a bevy of Philadelphia lawyers, there'll be enough nooks and crannies left in
it to hide any number of abortion mills.
At last report, the president was to get his near-billion for the U.N. in exchange for a ban on
any public funds being used to push abortion overseas. But, and there's always a but, the
president would be able to waive that provision, as he surely would. If he did, and here's the
counter-catch, the $385 million available for abortion programs abroad, a.k.a. family
planning, would be cut, though it's not clear by how much.
Tell us again, Mr. Speaker, about how all these parameters are tied down. Right now they
seem as slippery as a carload of eels, or even this president.
A lot of tricky negotiating still lies ahead, and it's possible that our simple, always
plain-spoken president will trick Congress again, and enjoy it. Which is what he did when
Congress demanded that he set up an independent agency to protect the country's nuclear
secrets. He signed the bill in order to get the appropriation for the Defense Department, then
turned around and appointed the same old officials, the very ones who had let the secrets
leak, to the top positions in this ``new, independent'' intelligence agency. Slick.
Slick Willie may be up to something like that in this tricky case -- a way to accept the
congressional ban on promoting abortion overseas without accepting it. It wouldn't surprise
me -- or anybody by now. He's quite capable of pulling off something like that, and laughing
about it later. And the GOP has proven remarkably easy to bamboozle in negotiations over
The president may agree to sign this bill, but only if it includes a clinton clause allowing him to
waive its provisions with no penalty -- in the interests of ``national security'' or some equally
elastic phrase. The only bar to any agreement with Bill Clinton is the English language. And
plain dealing. It isn't easy pinning down a president who will argue about what (ital)is(unital)
is. This president is as slippery as a razorback on ice.
Dennis Hastert had better make sure those parameters of his are locked up, tucked in,
hamstrung and guarded 'round the clock ... or they'll be gone by morning, when Bill Clinton
will explain that they never existed in the first place. There ain't a parameter yet written that
this boy couldn't, uh, adjust. Especially where abortion is concerned. Does he even use the
word anymore when arguing for it?
Abortion remains unmentionable in American society, but only by those who favor it. Instead,
they advocate population control, family planning, early termination, reproductive freedom,
choice, anything but what they're advocating.
Just the other morning, the mail brought a mailing from the Center for Reproductive Law and
Policy, which is a lot tonier name than Deathworks, and it never used the word abortion --
except in quotation marks. The last thing the abortion lobby wants to do is call something by
its right name.
Euphemism long ago became the lingua franca of this culture of death, and Bill Clinton speaks
it fluently. Besides, for this president to simply agree to pay our dues, and accept the
congressional language that bars funding for abortion, would defy the one contemporary
taboo this administration has always respected: faith in
Paul Greenberg Archives
©1999, Los Angeles Times Syndicate